在对流动性和投资风险有不同偏好的情况下退休储蓄清算的最佳策略

IF 1.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
Benjamin Avanzi, Lewis De Felice
{"title":"在对流动性和投资风险有不同偏好的情况下退休储蓄清算的最佳策略","authors":"Benjamin Avanzi, Lewis De Felice","doi":"10.1007/s10203-024-00448-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A retiree’s appetite for risk is a common input into the lifetime utility models that are traditionally used to find optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings. In this work, we consider a retiree with potentially differing appetites for the key financial risks of decumulation: liquidity risk and investment risk. We set out to determine whether these differing risk appetites have a significant impact on the retiree’s optimal choice of decumulation strategy. To do so, we design and implement a framework which selects the optimal decumulation strategy from a general set of admissible strategies in line with a retiree’s goals, and under differing appetites for the key risks of decumulation. Overall, we find significant evidence to suggest that a retiree’s differing appetites for different decumulation risks will impact their optimal choice of strategy at retirement. Through an illustrative example calibrated to the Australian context, we find results which are consistent with actual behaviours in this jurisdiction (in particular, a shallow market for annuities), which lends support to our framework and may provide some new insight into the so-called annuity puzzle.</p>","PeriodicalId":43711,"journal":{"name":"Decisions in Economics and Finance","volume":"219 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings under differing appetites for liquidity and investment risks\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Avanzi, Lewis De Felice\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10203-024-00448-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A retiree’s appetite for risk is a common input into the lifetime utility models that are traditionally used to find optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings. In this work, we consider a retiree with potentially differing appetites for the key financial risks of decumulation: liquidity risk and investment risk. We set out to determine whether these differing risk appetites have a significant impact on the retiree’s optimal choice of decumulation strategy. To do so, we design and implement a framework which selects the optimal decumulation strategy from a general set of admissible strategies in line with a retiree’s goals, and under differing appetites for the key risks of decumulation. Overall, we find significant evidence to suggest that a retiree’s differing appetites for different decumulation risks will impact their optimal choice of strategy at retirement. Through an illustrative example calibrated to the Australian context, we find results which are consistent with actual behaviours in this jurisdiction (in particular, a shallow market for annuities), which lends support to our framework and may provide some new insight into the so-called annuity puzzle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decisions in Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"219 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decisions in Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-024-00448-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decisions in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-024-00448-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

退休人员对风险的偏好是终生效用模型中的一个常见输入因素,该模型传统上用于寻找退休储蓄的最佳清算策略。在这项工作中,我们考虑到退休人员对退休储蓄的主要金融风险--流动性风险和投资风险--可能有不同的偏好。我们的目的是确定这些不同的风险偏好是否会对退休人员的最优退休策略选择产生重大影响。为此,我们设计并实施了一个框架,该框架可根据退休人员的目标,并在不同的养老金主要风险偏好下,从一般的可接受策略中选择最优的养老金缩减策略。总之,我们发现有重要证据表明,退休人员对不同的退休风险的不同偏好会影响他们在退休时对策略的最优选择。通过一个根据澳大利亚国情进行校准的示例,我们发现结果与该司法管辖区的实际行为(尤其是浅层年金市场)相一致,这为我们的框架提供了支持,并可能为所谓的年金之谜提供一些新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings under differing appetites for liquidity and investment risks

Optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings under differing appetites for liquidity and investment risks

A retiree’s appetite for risk is a common input into the lifetime utility models that are traditionally used to find optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings. In this work, we consider a retiree with potentially differing appetites for the key financial risks of decumulation: liquidity risk and investment risk. We set out to determine whether these differing risk appetites have a significant impact on the retiree’s optimal choice of decumulation strategy. To do so, we design and implement a framework which selects the optimal decumulation strategy from a general set of admissible strategies in line with a retiree’s goals, and under differing appetites for the key risks of decumulation. Overall, we find significant evidence to suggest that a retiree’s differing appetites for different decumulation risks will impact their optimal choice of strategy at retirement. Through an illustrative example calibrated to the Australian context, we find results which are consistent with actual behaviours in this jurisdiction (in particular, a shallow market for annuities), which lends support to our framework and may provide some new insight into the so-called annuity puzzle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decisions in Economics and Finance
Decisions in Economics and Finance SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Decisions in Economics and Finance: A Journal of Applied Mathematics is the official publication of the Association for Mathematics Applied to Social and Economic Sciences (AMASES). It provides a specialised forum for the publication of research in all areas of mathematics as applied to economics, finance, insurance, management and social sciences. Primary emphasis is placed on original research concerning topics in mathematics or computational techniques which are explicitly motivated by or contribute to the analysis of economic or financial problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信