"为什么旧的在死去,新的却没有诞生?津巴布韦教会与公共正义和公理的斗争

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 N/A RELIGION
John Gaga
{"title":"\"为什么旧的在死去,新的却没有诞生?津巴布韦教会与公共正义和公理的斗争","authors":"John Gaga","doi":"10.1163/15697320-20241461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article attempts to present how the church has struggled with public justice and righteousness in Zimbabwe where the past and old dominate the national debate without giving room for emerging personalities and ideas. The church introduced programmes, organisations and documents in an attempt to theoretically break away with the past. The documents are results of transformative projects designed to address the holistic needs of people in Zimbabwe against both the localised and internationalised neoliberal paradigms of Capitalism, Colonialism and Christianity that disempowered rather than liberated followers. Being critical of the past, Derrida says: “To ask such questions, such difficult questions, requires that we change the most resistant, archaic structures of our desire”. The Zimbabwe Heads of Christian Denominations (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ZHOCD</span> s) introduced the post-liberation discourse through the Zimbabwe We Want Document (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ZWWD</span>) in 2006, and a national economic discussion through the National Holistic Agenda for Renewal and Empowerment (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">NHARE</span>) in 2019 against the idea that the Church must be confined in the pews and politicians in the public arena. These documents and programmes engaged with both politicians and citizens in critical ways to achieve both justice and righteousness. Justice and righteousness are big themes in the Bible and Christian doctrine. Breaking away with the past promised to reverse the slippery slope on public life in Zimbabwe that increased national poverty, class inequalities, and factionalised politics. The opening of space in public life by the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ZHOCD</span> allowed citizens to engage in all public life and justice struggles, which is “a revival of a voice that has been silenced after independence, or was send to the Intensive Care Unit (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ICU</span>), paralysed, captured, neutralised or unauthorised”. It explored new alternatives to engaging state theology in relationship to the margins. Scripture has been useful in the church’s engagement with the state on public life goods, hence the question: “Why is the old dying and the new not being born”? The article pursues this question in view of the church programmes and documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":43324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Why Is the Old Dying and the New Is Not Being Born?” The Church’s Struggle with Public Justice and Righteousness in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"John Gaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15697320-20241461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article attempts to present how the church has struggled with public justice and righteousness in Zimbabwe where the past and old dominate the national debate without giving room for emerging personalities and ideas. The church introduced programmes, organisations and documents in an attempt to theoretically break away with the past. The documents are results of transformative projects designed to address the holistic needs of people in Zimbabwe against both the localised and internationalised neoliberal paradigms of Capitalism, Colonialism and Christianity that disempowered rather than liberated followers. Being critical of the past, Derrida says: “To ask such questions, such difficult questions, requires that we change the most resistant, archaic structures of our desire”. The Zimbabwe Heads of Christian Denominations (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ZHOCD</span> s) introduced the post-liberation discourse through the Zimbabwe We Want Document (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ZWWD</span>) in 2006, and a national economic discussion through the National Holistic Agenda for Renewal and Empowerment (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">NHARE</span>) in 2019 against the idea that the Church must be confined in the pews and politicians in the public arena. These documents and programmes engaged with both politicians and citizens in critical ways to achieve both justice and righteousness. Justice and righteousness are big themes in the Bible and Christian doctrine. Breaking away with the past promised to reverse the slippery slope on public life in Zimbabwe that increased national poverty, class inequalities, and factionalised politics. The opening of space in public life by the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ZHOCD</span> allowed citizens to engage in all public life and justice struggles, which is “a revival of a voice that has been silenced after independence, or was send to the Intensive Care Unit (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ICU</span>), paralysed, captured, neutralised or unauthorised”. It explored new alternatives to engaging state theology in relationship to the margins. Scripture has been useful in the church’s engagement with the state on public life goods, hence the question: “Why is the old dying and the new not being born”? The article pursues this question in view of the church programmes and documents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Theology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20241461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20241461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在津巴布韦,过去和陈旧的观念主导着全国性的辩论,没有给新出现的人物和思想留出空间。教会引入了各种计划、组织和文件,试图在理论上与过去决裂。这些文件是变革项目的成果,旨在满足津巴布韦人民的整体需求,反对资本主义、殖民主义和基督教的本土化和国际化的新自由主义模式,这些模式削弱了信徒的权能,而不是解放他们。德里达对过去持批判态度,他说:"提出这样的问题,这样困难的问题,需要我们改变我们欲望中最顽固、最陈旧的结构"。津巴布韦基督教各教派首领(ZHOCDs)于2006年通过《我们希望的津巴布韦文件》(Zimbabwe We Want Document,ZWWD)提出了解放后话语,并于2019年通过《国家复兴与赋权整体议程》(National Holistic Agenda for Renewal and Empowerment,NHARE)开展了国家经济讨论,反对教会必须局限于教堂而政治家必须出现在公共领域的观点。这些文件和计划以重要的方式与政治家和公民互动,以实现正义和公理。正义和公理是《圣经》和基督教教义的重要主题。与过去决裂有望扭转津巴布韦公共生活的滑坡趋势,这种滑坡加剧了国家贫困、阶级不平等和派别政治。ZHOCD 开辟的公共生活空间允许公民参与所有公共生活和正义斗争,这是 "一种声音的复兴,这种声音在独立后被压制,或被送进重症监护室(ICU),或被瘫痪、俘虏、中立化或未经授权"。它为国家神学与边缘群体的关系探索了新的选择。圣经在教会与国家就公共生活产品进行接触时一直很有用,因此提出了这个问题:"为什么旧的在消亡,新的没有诞生?文章从教会计划和文件的角度探讨了这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Why Is the Old Dying and the New Is Not Being Born?” The Church’s Struggle with Public Justice and Righteousness in Zimbabwe

This article attempts to present how the church has struggled with public justice and righteousness in Zimbabwe where the past and old dominate the national debate without giving room for emerging personalities and ideas. The church introduced programmes, organisations and documents in an attempt to theoretically break away with the past. The documents are results of transformative projects designed to address the holistic needs of people in Zimbabwe against both the localised and internationalised neoliberal paradigms of Capitalism, Colonialism and Christianity that disempowered rather than liberated followers. Being critical of the past, Derrida says: “To ask such questions, such difficult questions, requires that we change the most resistant, archaic structures of our desire”. The Zimbabwe Heads of Christian Denominations (ZHOCD s) introduced the post-liberation discourse through the Zimbabwe We Want Document (ZWWD) in 2006, and a national economic discussion through the National Holistic Agenda for Renewal and Empowerment (NHARE) in 2019 against the idea that the Church must be confined in the pews and politicians in the public arena. These documents and programmes engaged with both politicians and citizens in critical ways to achieve both justice and righteousness. Justice and righteousness are big themes in the Bible and Christian doctrine. Breaking away with the past promised to reverse the slippery slope on public life in Zimbabwe that increased national poverty, class inequalities, and factionalised politics. The opening of space in public life by the ZHOCD allowed citizens to engage in all public life and justice struggles, which is “a revival of a voice that has been silenced after independence, or was send to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), paralysed, captured, neutralised or unauthorised”. It explored new alternatives to engaging state theology in relationship to the margins. Scripture has been useful in the church’s engagement with the state on public life goods, hence the question: “Why is the old dying and the new not being born”? The article pursues this question in view of the church programmes and documents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信