Yuanxun Shao, Dillard Robertson, Michael Bynum, Carl D. Laird, Anya Castillo, Joseph K. Scott
{"title":"基于 SOCP 松弛的交流优化功率流的高效边界收紧","authors":"Yuanxun Shao, Dillard Robertson, Michael Bynum, Carl D. Laird, Anya Castillo, Joseph K. Scott","doi":"10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new bounds tightening algorithm for globally solving AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) problems is presented. Practical ACOPF instances are too large to be solved by conventional global optimization algorithms based on extensive search-space partitioning. However, tailored optimization-based bounds tightening (OBBT) algorithms using advanced relaxation techniques have been shown to achieve tight optimality gaps for many test cases with no partitioning at all. Unfortunately, OBBT is still costly because it requires solving two convex subproblems per decision variable in each iteration. We present a new OBBT algorithm, using a new SOCP based relaxation, that achieves tight optimality gaps while only solving subproblems for a small subset of variables. For PGLIB benchmarks up to 300 buses, the algorithm achieves the best gap on more test problems and is significantly faster on average than two existing OBBT algorithms chosen for comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":56141,"journal":{"name":"Optimization and Engineering","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient bounds tightening based on SOCP relaxations for AC optimal power flow\",\"authors\":\"Yuanxun Shao, Dillard Robertson, Michael Bynum, Carl D. Laird, Anya Castillo, Joseph K. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new bounds tightening algorithm for globally solving AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) problems is presented. Practical ACOPF instances are too large to be solved by conventional global optimization algorithms based on extensive search-space partitioning. However, tailored optimization-based bounds tightening (OBBT) algorithms using advanced relaxation techniques have been shown to achieve tight optimality gaps for many test cases with no partitioning at all. Unfortunately, OBBT is still costly because it requires solving two convex subproblems per decision variable in each iteration. We present a new OBBT algorithm, using a new SOCP based relaxation, that achieves tight optimality gaps while only solving subproblems for a small subset of variables. For PGLIB benchmarks up to 300 buses, the algorithm achieves the best gap on more test problems and is significantly faster on average than two existing OBBT algorithms chosen for comparison.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optimization and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optimization and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimization and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficient bounds tightening based on SOCP relaxations for AC optimal power flow
A new bounds tightening algorithm for globally solving AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) problems is presented. Practical ACOPF instances are too large to be solved by conventional global optimization algorithms based on extensive search-space partitioning. However, tailored optimization-based bounds tightening (OBBT) algorithms using advanced relaxation techniques have been shown to achieve tight optimality gaps for many test cases with no partitioning at all. Unfortunately, OBBT is still costly because it requires solving two convex subproblems per decision variable in each iteration. We present a new OBBT algorithm, using a new SOCP based relaxation, that achieves tight optimality gaps while only solving subproblems for a small subset of variables. For PGLIB benchmarks up to 300 buses, the algorithm achieves the best gap on more test problems and is significantly faster on average than two existing OBBT algorithms chosen for comparison.
期刊介绍:
Optimization and Engineering is a multidisciplinary journal; its primary goal is to promote the application of optimization methods in the general area of engineering sciences. We expect submissions to OPTE not only to make a significant optimization contribution but also to impact a specific engineering application.
Topics of Interest:
-Optimization: All methods and algorithms of mathematical optimization, including blackbox and derivative-free optimization, continuous optimization, discrete optimization, global optimization, linear and conic optimization, multiobjective optimization, PDE-constrained optimization & control, and stochastic optimization. Numerical and implementation issues, optimization software, benchmarking, and case studies.
-Engineering Sciences: Aerospace engineering, biomedical engineering, chemical & process engineering, civil, environmental, & architectural engineering, electrical engineering, financial engineering, geosciences, healthcare engineering, industrial & systems engineering, mechanical engineering & MDO, and robotics.