基于 SOCP 松弛的交流优化功率流的高效边界收紧

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yuanxun Shao, Dillard Robertson, Michael Bynum, Carl D. Laird, Anya Castillo, Joseph K. Scott
{"title":"基于 SOCP 松弛的交流优化功率流的高效边界收紧","authors":"Yuanxun Shao, Dillard Robertson, Michael Bynum, Carl D. Laird, Anya Castillo, Joseph K. Scott","doi":"10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new bounds tightening algorithm for globally solving AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) problems is presented. Practical ACOPF instances are too large to be solved by conventional global optimization algorithms based on extensive search-space partitioning. However, tailored optimization-based bounds tightening (OBBT) algorithms using advanced relaxation techniques have been shown to achieve tight optimality gaps for many test cases with no partitioning at all. Unfortunately, OBBT is still costly because it requires solving two convex subproblems per decision variable in each iteration. We present a new OBBT algorithm, using a new SOCP based relaxation, that achieves tight optimality gaps while only solving subproblems for a small subset of variables. For PGLIB benchmarks up to 300 buses, the algorithm achieves the best gap on more test problems and is significantly faster on average than two existing OBBT algorithms chosen for comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":56141,"journal":{"name":"Optimization and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient bounds tightening based on SOCP relaxations for AC optimal power flow\",\"authors\":\"Yuanxun Shao, Dillard Robertson, Michael Bynum, Carl D. Laird, Anya Castillo, Joseph K. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new bounds tightening algorithm for globally solving AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) problems is presented. Practical ACOPF instances are too large to be solved by conventional global optimization algorithms based on extensive search-space partitioning. However, tailored optimization-based bounds tightening (OBBT) algorithms using advanced relaxation techniques have been shown to achieve tight optimality gaps for many test cases with no partitioning at all. Unfortunately, OBBT is still costly because it requires solving two convex subproblems per decision variable in each iteration. We present a new OBBT algorithm, using a new SOCP based relaxation, that achieves tight optimality gaps while only solving subproblems for a small subset of variables. For PGLIB benchmarks up to 300 buses, the algorithm achieves the best gap on more test problems and is significantly faster on average than two existing OBBT algorithms chosen for comparison.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optimization and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optimization and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimization and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-024-09891-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种用于全局求解交流最优功率流(ACOPF)问题的新边界收紧算法。实际的 ACOPF 实例太大,无法用基于广泛搜索空间划分的传统全局优化算法来解决。然而,基于优化的定制边界收紧(OBBT)算法采用了先进的松弛技术,已被证明可以在完全不进行分区的情况下为许多测试案例实现严格的优化差距。遗憾的是,OBBT 仍然代价高昂,因为它需要在每次迭代中解决每个决策变量的两个凸子问题。我们提出了一种新的 OBBT 算法,它使用了一种基于 SOCP 的新松弛方法,只需解决一小部分变量的子问题,就能实现紧密的优化差距。在多达 300 个总线的 PGLIB 基准中,该算法在更多测试问题上实现了最佳间隙,而且平均速度明显快于用于比较的两种现有 OBBT 算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficient bounds tightening based on SOCP relaxations for AC optimal power flow

Efficient bounds tightening based on SOCP relaxations for AC optimal power flow

A new bounds tightening algorithm for globally solving AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) problems is presented. Practical ACOPF instances are too large to be solved by conventional global optimization algorithms based on extensive search-space partitioning. However, tailored optimization-based bounds tightening (OBBT) algorithms using advanced relaxation techniques have been shown to achieve tight optimality gaps for many test cases with no partitioning at all. Unfortunately, OBBT is still costly because it requires solving two convex subproblems per decision variable in each iteration. We present a new OBBT algorithm, using a new SOCP based relaxation, that achieves tight optimality gaps while only solving subproblems for a small subset of variables. For PGLIB benchmarks up to 300 buses, the algorithm achieves the best gap on more test problems and is significantly faster on average than two existing OBBT algorithms chosen for comparison.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optimization and Engineering
Optimization and Engineering 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Optimization and Engineering is a multidisciplinary journal; its primary goal is to promote the application of optimization methods in the general area of engineering sciences. We expect submissions to OPTE not only to make a significant optimization contribution but also to impact a specific engineering application. Topics of Interest: -Optimization: All methods and algorithms of mathematical optimization, including blackbox and derivative-free optimization, continuous optimization, discrete optimization, global optimization, linear and conic optimization, multiobjective optimization, PDE-constrained optimization & control, and stochastic optimization. Numerical and implementation issues, optimization software, benchmarking, and case studies. -Engineering Sciences: Aerospace engineering, biomedical engineering, chemical & process engineering, civil, environmental, & architectural engineering, electrical engineering, financial engineering, geosciences, healthcare engineering, industrial & systems engineering, mechanical engineering & MDO, and robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信