YouTube 上的科学讨论:在评论中引用研究成果的动机

Sören Striewski, Olga Zagovora, Isabella Peters
{"title":"YouTube 上的科学讨论:在评论中引用研究成果的动机","authors":"Sören Striewski, Olga Zagovora, Isabella Peters","doi":"arxiv-2405.12798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"YouTube is a valuable source of user-generated content on a wide range of\ntopics, and it encourages user participation through the use of a comment\nsystem. Video content is increasingly addressing scientific topics, and there\nis evidence that both academics and consumers use video descriptions and video\ncomments to refer to academic research and scientific publications. Because\ncommenting is a discursive behavior, this study will provide insights on why\nindividuals post links to research publications in comments. For this, a\nqualitative content analysis and iterative coding approach were applied.\nFurthermore, the reasons for mentioning academic publications in comments were\ncontrasted with the reasons for citing in scholarly works and with reasons for\ncommenting on YouTube. We discovered that the primary motives for sharing\nresearch links were (1) providing more insights into the topic and (2)\nchallenging information offered by other commentators.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific discourse on YouTube: Motivations for citing research in comments\",\"authors\":\"Sören Striewski, Olga Zagovora, Isabella Peters\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.12798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"YouTube is a valuable source of user-generated content on a wide range of\\ntopics, and it encourages user participation through the use of a comment\\nsystem. Video content is increasingly addressing scientific topics, and there\\nis evidence that both academics and consumers use video descriptions and video\\ncomments to refer to academic research and scientific publications. Because\\ncommenting is a discursive behavior, this study will provide insights on why\\nindividuals post links to research publications in comments. For this, a\\nqualitative content analysis and iterative coding approach were applied.\\nFurthermore, the reasons for mentioning academic publications in comments were\\ncontrasted with the reasons for citing in scholarly works and with reasons for\\ncommenting on YouTube. We discovered that the primary motives for sharing\\nresearch links were (1) providing more insights into the topic and (2)\\nchallenging information offered by other commentators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.12798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.12798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

YouTube 是用户生成内容的重要来源,内容涉及广泛的主题,并通过使用评论系统鼓励用户参与。视频内容越来越多地涉及科学话题,有证据表明,学者和消费者都使用视频描述和视频评论来参考学术研究和科学出版物。由于评论是一种话语行为,本研究将深入探讨为什么个人会在评论中发布研究出版物的链接。此外,我们还将在评论中提及学术出版物的原因与在学术著作中引用的原因以及在 YouTube 上发表评论的原因进行了对比。我们发现,分享研究链接的主要动机是:(1) 为话题提供更多见解;(2) 质疑其他评论者提供的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific discourse on YouTube: Motivations for citing research in comments
YouTube is a valuable source of user-generated content on a wide range of topics, and it encourages user participation through the use of a comment system. Video content is increasingly addressing scientific topics, and there is evidence that both academics and consumers use video descriptions and video comments to refer to academic research and scientific publications. Because commenting is a discursive behavior, this study will provide insights on why individuals post links to research publications in comments. For this, a qualitative content analysis and iterative coding approach were applied. Furthermore, the reasons for mentioning academic publications in comments were contrasted with the reasons for citing in scholarly works and with reasons for commenting on YouTube. We discovered that the primary motives for sharing research links were (1) providing more insights into the topic and (2) challenging information offered by other commentators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信