心房颤动患者使用超高功率短时消融术进行首段肺静脉隔离后,左心房壁厚度与残余电位之间的关系

S R Lee, K Y Lee, E K Choi, S Oh
{"title":"心房颤动患者使用超高功率短时消融术进行首段肺静脉隔离后,左心房壁厚度与残余电位之间的关系","authors":"S R Lee, K Y Lee, E K Choi, S Oh","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae102.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In this study, we evaluated efficacy, efficiency, and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) applying vHPSD ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and explored the association between left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) and the residual potential after first-pass PVI. Methods Between April 2, 2023 and October 6, 2023, drug refractory symptomatic AF patients who underwent AF ablation using vHPSD ablation strategy with QDOT MICRO catheter were prospectively enrolled. All patients took cardiac computed tomography (CT) a day before procedure. Using CT image, LAWT map was created. PV segments were categorized into prespecified 14 segments, and LAWT of each segment, segments with residual potential (RP) after first-pass PVI and early reconnection after 20-minute waiting after PVI were evaluated. Total procedure time, ablation time for PVI, and occurrence of procedure-related complication were collected. Results A total of 40 patients were included (mean age 64 years, 45% of persistent AF). Additional ablation other than PV was performed in 48% of patients, total procedure time was 77 minutes, and total PVI time was 9.9 minutes. With vHPSD PVI, all PVs first pass isolation rate was 60%; in terms of per PV, RSPV first-pass isolation was 88%, followed by LSPV and LIPV 85%, RIPV showed lowest first-pass isolation rate, 75% (Figure A). Most common RP sites was right carina, followed by left carina (Figure A). Compared to historical comparator, vHPSD PVI showed shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, with numerically lower but statistically comparable first-pass PVI rate (Figure B). In total 560 PV segments in 40 patients, RSPV anterior, left carina, and right carina showed higher prevalence to be thick PV segments (over 60% of patients), followed by RPSV posterior, LSPV posterior, and RIPV anterior (over 40% of patients). Looking into ablation parameter detail, mean contact force was 10g, mean temperature was 47°C, and mean impedance drop was 8.4Ω. Compared to segments without RP, segments with RP showed thicker mean left atrial wall thickness grades, lower minimum contact force, higher maximum temperature, and lower minimum impedance drop. According to the left atrial wall thickness, thick PV segments showed higher prevalence of RP after first-pass PVI with vHPSD ablation. In segments with LAWT grade 3 or more, the RP rate was 9.1%. This thickness means thicker than 1.5 to 2.0 mm of thickness (Figure C). In 10% of patients (n=4) had audible or tactile steam-pops, visible char was confirmed in 5% of patients (n=2). There were no clinical complications. Conclusion PVI using vHPSD achieved shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, and comparable first-pass PVI rate compared to historical comparator using ablation-index guided conventional power ablation. Thick segments had higher chance to have residual potential after first-pass PVI with vHPSD.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between left atrial wall thickness and residual potential after first-pass pulmonary vein isolation using very high-power short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"S R Lee, K Y Lee, E K Choi, S Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euae102.215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background In this study, we evaluated efficacy, efficiency, and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) applying vHPSD ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and explored the association between left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) and the residual potential after first-pass PVI. Methods Between April 2, 2023 and October 6, 2023, drug refractory symptomatic AF patients who underwent AF ablation using vHPSD ablation strategy with QDOT MICRO catheter were prospectively enrolled. All patients took cardiac computed tomography (CT) a day before procedure. Using CT image, LAWT map was created. PV segments were categorized into prespecified 14 segments, and LAWT of each segment, segments with residual potential (RP) after first-pass PVI and early reconnection after 20-minute waiting after PVI were evaluated. Total procedure time, ablation time for PVI, and occurrence of procedure-related complication were collected. Results A total of 40 patients were included (mean age 64 years, 45% of persistent AF). Additional ablation other than PV was performed in 48% of patients, total procedure time was 77 minutes, and total PVI time was 9.9 minutes. With vHPSD PVI, all PVs first pass isolation rate was 60%; in terms of per PV, RSPV first-pass isolation was 88%, followed by LSPV and LIPV 85%, RIPV showed lowest first-pass isolation rate, 75% (Figure A). Most common RP sites was right carina, followed by left carina (Figure A). Compared to historical comparator, vHPSD PVI showed shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, with numerically lower but statistically comparable first-pass PVI rate (Figure B). In total 560 PV segments in 40 patients, RSPV anterior, left carina, and right carina showed higher prevalence to be thick PV segments (over 60% of patients), followed by RPSV posterior, LSPV posterior, and RIPV anterior (over 40% of patients). Looking into ablation parameter detail, mean contact force was 10g, mean temperature was 47°C, and mean impedance drop was 8.4Ω. Compared to segments without RP, segments with RP showed thicker mean left atrial wall thickness grades, lower minimum contact force, higher maximum temperature, and lower minimum impedance drop. According to the left atrial wall thickness, thick PV segments showed higher prevalence of RP after first-pass PVI with vHPSD ablation. In segments with LAWT grade 3 or more, the RP rate was 9.1%. This thickness means thicker than 1.5 to 2.0 mm of thickness (Figure C). In 10% of patients (n=4) had audible or tactile steam-pops, visible char was confirmed in 5% of patients (n=2). There were no clinical complications. Conclusion PVI using vHPSD achieved shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, and comparable first-pass PVI rate compared to historical comparator using ablation-index guided conventional power ablation. Thick segments had higher chance to have residual potential after first-pass PVI with vHPSD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae102.215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae102.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 本研究评估了心房颤动(房颤)患者应用 vHPSD 消融策略进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)的疗效、效率和安全性,并探讨了左心房壁厚度(LAWT)与首次 PVI 后残余电位之间的关联。方法 在2023年4月2日至2023年10月6日期间,前瞻性地纳入了使用QDOT MICRO导管采用vHPSD消融策略进行房颤消融的药物难治性无症状房颤患者。所有患者均在手术前一天接受心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)。利用 CT 图像绘制了 LAWT 图。PV 节段被分为预先指定的 14 个节段,评估了每个节段的 LAWT、首次 PVI 后有残余电位(RP)的节段以及 PVI 后等待 20 分钟后的早期再连接情况。收集了手术总时间、PVI 的消融时间以及手术相关并发症的发生情况。结果 共纳入 40 名患者(平均年龄 64 岁,45% 为持续性房颤)。48%的患者进行了除 PV 以外的其他消融,手术总时间为 77 分钟,PVI 总时间为 9.9 分钟。使用 vHPSD PVI 时,所有 PV 的首次通过隔离率为 60%;就每个 PV 而言,RSPV 的首次通过隔离率为 88%,其次是 LSPV 和 LIPV,为 85%,RIPV 的首次通过隔离率最低,为 75%(图 A)。最常见的 RP 位点是右心瓣膜,其次是左心瓣膜(图 A)。与历史比较者相比,vHPSD PVI 的手术时间更短,PVI 的消融时间更短,首次通过 PVI 率虽然在数字上较低,但在统计学上具有可比性(图 B)。在 40 名患者的总共 560 个 PV 段中,RSPV 前、左心房和右心房显示为厚 PV 段的比例较高(超过 60% 的患者),其次是 RPSV 后、LSPV 后和 RIPV 前(超过 40% 的患者)。消融参数详情显示,平均接触力为 10g,平均温度为 47°C,平均阻抗下降为 8.4Ω。与无 RP 的区段相比,有 RP 的区段平均左心房壁厚度等级较厚,最小接触力较低,最高温度较高,最小阻抗下降较低。根据左心房壁厚度,厚的 PV 区段在使用 vHPSD 消融术进行首次 PVI 后出现 RP 的几率更高。在 LAWT 3 级或以上的区段,RP 发生率为 9.1%。这种厚度是指厚度超过 1.5 至 2.0 毫米(图 C)。10%的患者(4人)出现了听觉或触觉蒸汽爆裂,5%的患者(2人)证实出现了可见炭化。没有临床并发症。结论 与使用消融指数引导的传统动力消融术的历史比较者相比,使用 vHPSD 进行 PVI 的手术时间更短,PVI 的消融时间更短,首通 PVI 率相当。使用 vHPSD 进行首次 PVI 后,厚节段具有残余电位的几率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between left atrial wall thickness and residual potential after first-pass pulmonary vein isolation using very high-power short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation
Background In this study, we evaluated efficacy, efficiency, and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) applying vHPSD ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and explored the association between left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) and the residual potential after first-pass PVI. Methods Between April 2, 2023 and October 6, 2023, drug refractory symptomatic AF patients who underwent AF ablation using vHPSD ablation strategy with QDOT MICRO catheter were prospectively enrolled. All patients took cardiac computed tomography (CT) a day before procedure. Using CT image, LAWT map was created. PV segments were categorized into prespecified 14 segments, and LAWT of each segment, segments with residual potential (RP) after first-pass PVI and early reconnection after 20-minute waiting after PVI were evaluated. Total procedure time, ablation time for PVI, and occurrence of procedure-related complication were collected. Results A total of 40 patients were included (mean age 64 years, 45% of persistent AF). Additional ablation other than PV was performed in 48% of patients, total procedure time was 77 minutes, and total PVI time was 9.9 minutes. With vHPSD PVI, all PVs first pass isolation rate was 60%; in terms of per PV, RSPV first-pass isolation was 88%, followed by LSPV and LIPV 85%, RIPV showed lowest first-pass isolation rate, 75% (Figure A). Most common RP sites was right carina, followed by left carina (Figure A). Compared to historical comparator, vHPSD PVI showed shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, with numerically lower but statistically comparable first-pass PVI rate (Figure B). In total 560 PV segments in 40 patients, RSPV anterior, left carina, and right carina showed higher prevalence to be thick PV segments (over 60% of patients), followed by RPSV posterior, LSPV posterior, and RIPV anterior (over 40% of patients). Looking into ablation parameter detail, mean contact force was 10g, mean temperature was 47°C, and mean impedance drop was 8.4Ω. Compared to segments without RP, segments with RP showed thicker mean left atrial wall thickness grades, lower minimum contact force, higher maximum temperature, and lower minimum impedance drop. According to the left atrial wall thickness, thick PV segments showed higher prevalence of RP after first-pass PVI with vHPSD ablation. In segments with LAWT grade 3 or more, the RP rate was 9.1%. This thickness means thicker than 1.5 to 2.0 mm of thickness (Figure C). In 10% of patients (n=4) had audible or tactile steam-pops, visible char was confirmed in 5% of patients (n=2). There were no clinical complications. Conclusion PVI using vHPSD achieved shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, and comparable first-pass PVI rate compared to historical comparator using ablation-index guided conventional power ablation. Thick segments had higher chance to have residual potential after first-pass PVI with vHPSD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信