{"title":"反事实逻辑与因果推理认识论","authors":"Hanti Lin","doi":"arxiv-2405.11284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics recognized a theory of causal inference,\nwhich deserves more attention from philosophers. To that end, I develop a\ndialectic that extends the Lewis-Stalnaker debate on a logical principle called\nConditional Excluded Middle (CEM). I first play the good cop for CEM, and give\na new argument for it: a Quine-Putnam indispensability argument based on the\nNobel-Prize winning theory. But then I switch sides and play the bad cop: I\nundermine that argument with a new theory of causal inference that preserves\nthe success of the original theory but dispenses with CEM.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logic of Counterfactuals and the Epistemology of Causal Inference\",\"authors\":\"Hanti Lin\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.11284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics recognized a theory of causal inference,\\nwhich deserves more attention from philosophers. To that end, I develop a\\ndialectic that extends the Lewis-Stalnaker debate on a logical principle called\\nConditional Excluded Middle (CEM). I first play the good cop for CEM, and give\\na new argument for it: a Quine-Putnam indispensability argument based on the\\nNobel-Prize winning theory. But then I switch sides and play the bad cop: I\\nundermine that argument with a new theory of causal inference that preserves\\nthe success of the original theory but dispenses with CEM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.11284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.11284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2021 年诺贝尔经济学奖认可了一种因果推理理论,该理论值得哲学家们更多关注。为此,我提出了一个辩证法,扩展了刘易斯-斯塔尔纳克关于一个名为 "条件排除中间"(CEM)的逻辑原则的辩论。我首先为 CEM 扮演了一个好警察的角色,并为它提供了一个新的论证:一个基于诺贝尔奖获奖理论的奎因-普特南不可或缺性论证。但随后,我又换了一边,扮演了坏警察的角色:我用一种新的因果推理理论来破坏这一论证,这种理论保留了原有理论的成功之处,但却摒弃了CEM。
The Logic of Counterfactuals and the Epistemology of Causal Inference
The 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics recognized a theory of causal inference,
which deserves more attention from philosophers. To that end, I develop a
dialectic that extends the Lewis-Stalnaker debate on a logical principle called
Conditional Excluded Middle (CEM). I first play the good cop for CEM, and give
a new argument for it: a Quine-Putnam indispensability argument based on the
Nobel-Prize winning theory. But then I switch sides and play the bad cop: I
undermine that argument with a new theory of causal inference that preserves
the success of the original theory but dispenses with CEM.