关于 2015 年 11 月巴黎袭击事件中平民经历的变化的纵向研究

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sophie Fierdepied , Philippe Pirard , Yvon Motreff , Thierry Baubet
{"title":"关于 2015 年 11 月巴黎袭击事件中平民经历的变化的纵向研究","authors":"Sophie Fierdepied ,&nbsp;Philippe Pirard ,&nbsp;Yvon Motreff ,&nbsp;Thierry Baubet","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Following the attacks of November 13, 2015, Santé Publique France set up an epidemiological survey. A first phase was carried out in 2016 then repeated in 2020, in order to understand the post-traumatic impact of the attacks. The survey consisted of closed and open-ended questions. We present here the analysis of the answers to the following open-ended questions: “Would you say that the attacks that your experienced has changed you in any way? Could you explain how?” We compare the answers given in 2016 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the individual impact of terrorist attacks on civilians between 2016 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Based on a qualitative analysis, we compare the results at two different times and observe the evolution of these responses. The material is composed of short testimonials related to the question of interest and are processed by thematic analysis inspired by grounded theory. We analyze the responses from 2016 and 2020 independently, and then compare the emerging themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results highlight the presence of symptoms associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, with symptoms of intrusion, persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event, altered cognition and mood changes in arousal and reactivity related to the traumatic event, significant suffering, and sometimes dissociative elements. Five years after the attacks, disorders are still present in some subjects. The most distressed ones present a profile with no projection into the future, living from day to day, sometimes associated with risky behaviors. The meaning of their existence eludes them. Another part of the respondents tries to find meaning in their lives. They are looking for new life projects. The process of transforming their individuality is underway. Finally, for others whose profiles appear in the 2020 testimonials, changes have been made, they have been able to mourn their past life, who they were, and overcome their trauma. They are resilient and, in some cases, show psychic functioning suggestive of post-traumatic growth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The psychological impact of terrorist attacks on civilians is still very much present with important suffering, but some form of adaptation in the form of resilience or even post-traumatic growth is underway for some five years after the November 2015 attacks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":"183 6","pages":"Pages 598-605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Étude longitudinale des changements éprouvés par les civils exposés aux attentats de novembre 2015 à Paris\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Fierdepied ,&nbsp;Philippe Pirard ,&nbsp;Yvon Motreff ,&nbsp;Thierry Baubet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amp.2024.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Following the attacks of November 13, 2015, Santé Publique France set up an epidemiological survey. A first phase was carried out in 2016 then repeated in 2020, in order to understand the post-traumatic impact of the attacks. The survey consisted of closed and open-ended questions. We present here the analysis of the answers to the following open-ended questions: “Would you say that the attacks that your experienced has changed you in any way? Could you explain how?” We compare the answers given in 2016 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the individual impact of terrorist attacks on civilians between 2016 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Based on a qualitative analysis, we compare the results at two different times and observe the evolution of these responses. The material is composed of short testimonials related to the question of interest and are processed by thematic analysis inspired by grounded theory. We analyze the responses from 2016 and 2020 independently, and then compare the emerging themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results highlight the presence of symptoms associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, with symptoms of intrusion, persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event, altered cognition and mood changes in arousal and reactivity related to the traumatic event, significant suffering, and sometimes dissociative elements. Five years after the attacks, disorders are still present in some subjects. The most distressed ones present a profile with no projection into the future, living from day to day, sometimes associated with risky behaviors. The meaning of their existence eludes them. Another part of the respondents tries to find meaning in their lives. They are looking for new life projects. The process of transforming their individuality is underway. Finally, for others whose profiles appear in the 2020 testimonials, changes have been made, they have been able to mourn their past life, who they were, and overcome their trauma. They are resilient and, in some cases, show psychic functioning suggestive of post-traumatic growth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The psychological impact of terrorist attacks on civilians is still very much present with important suffering, but some form of adaptation in the form of resilience or even post-traumatic growth is underway for some five years after the November 2015 attacks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales medico-psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"183 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 598-605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales medico-psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448724001665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448724001665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2015年11月13日的袭击事件之后,法国圣公共机构开展了一项流行病学调查。第一阶段于2016年进行,然后在2020年重复进行,以了解袭击的创伤后影响。调查包括封闭式和开放式问题。在这里,我们对以下开放式问题的答案进行了分析:“你是否认为你所经历的袭击在某种程度上改变了你?”你能解释一下怎么做吗?”我们比较了2016年和2020年给出的答案。目的了解2016 - 2020年恐怖袭击对平民个体的影响。方法在定性分析的基础上,比较两个不同时间的结果,观察这些响应的演变。材料是由简短的证言有关的问题的兴趣和处理的主题分析启发接地理论。我们对2016年和2020年的调查结果进行了独立分析,然后对新兴主题进行了比较。结果结果强调了创伤后应激障碍相关症状的存在,包括与创伤事件相关的干扰症状、持续回避刺激的症状、与创伤事件相关的觉醒和反应性的认知和情绪改变、显著的痛苦,有时还有分离因素。在袭击发生五年后,一些研究对象仍然存在精神障碍。最痛苦的人表现出对未来没有预测的形象,日复一日地生活,有时还伴有危险行为。他们不知道存在的意义。另一部分受访者试图找到生活的意义。他们在寻找新的生活项目。他们个性转变的过程正在进行中。最后,对于那些在2020年的证词中出现的人来说,已经做出了改变,他们已经能够哀悼他们过去的生活,他们是谁,并克服了他们的创伤。他们很有弹性,在某些情况下,表现出创伤后成长的心理功能。恐怖袭击对平民造成的心理影响仍然非常严重,带来了巨大的痛苦,但在2015年11月的袭击发生后的大约五年里,人们正在进行某种形式的适应,比如恢复力,甚至是创伤后成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Étude longitudinale des changements éprouvés par les civils exposés aux attentats de novembre 2015 à Paris

Introduction

Following the attacks of November 13, 2015, Santé Publique France set up an epidemiological survey. A first phase was carried out in 2016 then repeated in 2020, in order to understand the post-traumatic impact of the attacks. The survey consisted of closed and open-ended questions. We present here the analysis of the answers to the following open-ended questions: “Would you say that the attacks that your experienced has changed you in any way? Could you explain how?” We compare the answers given in 2016 and 2020.

Objective

To understand the individual impact of terrorist attacks on civilians between 2016 and 2020.

Method

Based on a qualitative analysis, we compare the results at two different times and observe the evolution of these responses. The material is composed of short testimonials related to the question of interest and are processed by thematic analysis inspired by grounded theory. We analyze the responses from 2016 and 2020 independently, and then compare the emerging themes.

Results

The results highlight the presence of symptoms associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, with symptoms of intrusion, persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event, altered cognition and mood changes in arousal and reactivity related to the traumatic event, significant suffering, and sometimes dissociative elements. Five years after the attacks, disorders are still present in some subjects. The most distressed ones present a profile with no projection into the future, living from day to day, sometimes associated with risky behaviors. The meaning of their existence eludes them. Another part of the respondents tries to find meaning in their lives. They are looking for new life projects. The process of transforming their individuality is underway. Finally, for others whose profiles appear in the 2020 testimonials, changes have been made, they have been able to mourn their past life, who they were, and overcome their trauma. They are resilient and, in some cases, show psychic functioning suggestive of post-traumatic growth.

Conclusion

The psychological impact of terrorist attacks on civilians is still very much present with important suffering, but some form of adaptation in the form of resilience or even post-traumatic growth is underway for some five years after the November 2015 attacks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信