通过代用模型对大型保险组合进行有效的经验评级

IF 1.9 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Sebastián Calcetero Vanegas, Andrei L. Badescu, X. Sheldon Lin
{"title":"通过代用模型对大型保险组合进行有效的经验评级","authors":"Sebastián Calcetero Vanegas,&nbsp;Andrei L. Badescu,&nbsp;X. Sheldon Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Experience rating in insurance uses a Bayesian credibility model to upgrade the current premiums of a contract by taking into account policyholders' attributes and their claim history. Most data-driven models used for this task are mathematically intractable, and premiums must be obtained through numerical methods such as simulation via MCMC. However, these methods can be computationally expensive and even prohibitive for large portfolios when applied at the policyholder level. Additionally, these computations become “black-box” procedures as there is no analytical expression showing how the claim history of policyholders is used to upgrade their premiums. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a surrogate modeling approach to inexpensively derive an analytical expression for computing the Bayesian premiums for any given model, approximately. As a part of the methodology, the paper introduces a <em>likelihood-based summary statistic</em> of the policyholder's claim history that serves as the main input of the surrogate model and that is sufficient for certain families of distribution, including the exponential dispersion family. As a result, the computational burden of experience rating for large portfolios is reduced through the direct evaluation of such analytical expression, which can provide a transparent and interpretable way of computing Bayesian premiums.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54974,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 25-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016766872400060X/pdfft?md5=485a9e9970e8fac466b99440e9e27b0a&pid=1-s2.0-S016766872400060X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective experience rating for large insurance portfolios via surrogate modeling\",\"authors\":\"Sebastián Calcetero Vanegas,&nbsp;Andrei L. Badescu,&nbsp;X. Sheldon Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Experience rating in insurance uses a Bayesian credibility model to upgrade the current premiums of a contract by taking into account policyholders' attributes and their claim history. Most data-driven models used for this task are mathematically intractable, and premiums must be obtained through numerical methods such as simulation via MCMC. However, these methods can be computationally expensive and even prohibitive for large portfolios when applied at the policyholder level. Additionally, these computations become “black-box” procedures as there is no analytical expression showing how the claim history of policyholders is used to upgrade their premiums. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a surrogate modeling approach to inexpensively derive an analytical expression for computing the Bayesian premiums for any given model, approximately. As a part of the methodology, the paper introduces a <em>likelihood-based summary statistic</em> of the policyholder's claim history that serves as the main input of the surrogate model and that is sufficient for certain families of distribution, including the exponential dispersion family. As a result, the computational burden of experience rating for large portfolios is reduced through the direct evaluation of such analytical expression, which can provide a transparent and interpretable way of computing Bayesian premiums.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance Mathematics & Economics\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016766872400060X/pdfft?md5=485a9e9970e8fac466b99440e9e27b0a&pid=1-s2.0-S016766872400060X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance Mathematics & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016766872400060X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016766872400060X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保险中的经验评级使用贝叶斯可信度模型,通过考虑投保人的属性及其索赔历史记录来提升合同的当前保费。用于这项任务的大多数数据驱动模型在数学上都是难以处理的,因此必须通过数值方法(如通过 MCMC 进行模拟)来获得保费。然而,这些方法的计算成本很高,在投保人层面应用时甚至会使大型投资组合望而却步。此外,这些计算成为 "黑箱 "程序,因为没有分析表达式显示投保人的索赔历史如何用于提升其保费。为了应对这些挑战,本文提出了一种代理建模方法,以低成本推导出计算任何给定模型的贝叶斯保费的近似分析表达式。作为该方法的一部分,本文引入了一个基于似然法的投保人索赔历史汇总统计量,作为代用模型的主要输入,该统计量对于某些分布族(包括指数分散族)是足够的。因此,通过对这种分析表达式的直接评估,可以为计算贝叶斯保费提供一种透明、可解释的方法,从而减轻大型投资组合经验评级的计算负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective experience rating for large insurance portfolios via surrogate modeling

Experience rating in insurance uses a Bayesian credibility model to upgrade the current premiums of a contract by taking into account policyholders' attributes and their claim history. Most data-driven models used for this task are mathematically intractable, and premiums must be obtained through numerical methods such as simulation via MCMC. However, these methods can be computationally expensive and even prohibitive for large portfolios when applied at the policyholder level. Additionally, these computations become “black-box” procedures as there is no analytical expression showing how the claim history of policyholders is used to upgrade their premiums. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a surrogate modeling approach to inexpensively derive an analytical expression for computing the Bayesian premiums for any given model, approximately. As a part of the methodology, the paper introduces a likelihood-based summary statistic of the policyholder's claim history that serves as the main input of the surrogate model and that is sufficient for certain families of distribution, including the exponential dispersion family. As a result, the computational burden of experience rating for large portfolios is reduced through the direct evaluation of such analytical expression, which can provide a transparent and interpretable way of computing Bayesian premiums.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Mathematics & Economics
Insurance Mathematics & Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
17.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes leading research spanning all fields of actuarial science research. It appears six times per year and is the largest journal in actuarial science research around the world. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is an international academic journal that aims to strengthen the communication between individuals and groups who develop and apply research results in actuarial science. The journal feels a particular obligation to facilitate closer cooperation between those who conduct research in insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics, and practicing actuaries who are interested in the implementation of the results. To this purpose, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes high-quality articles of broad international interest, concerned with either the theory of insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics or the inventive application of it, including empirical or experimental results. Articles that combine several of these aspects are particularly considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信