{"title":"采用新辅助化放疗治疗 T4 和/或 N2 直肠癌的临床疗效；一项回顾性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced </span>rectal cancer<span> (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma<span> who were treated with chemoradiotherapy<span> followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year </span>overall survival<span> (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (</span></span><em>P</em> = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (<em>P</em> = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes in T4 and/or N2 Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced </span>rectal cancer<span> (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma<span> who were treated with chemoradiotherapy<span> followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year </span>overall survival<span> (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (</span></span><em>P</em> = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (<em>P</em> = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 251-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824000471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824000471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Outcomes in T4 and/or N2 Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study
Introduction
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features.
Methodology
In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019.
Results
The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (P = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (P = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR.
Conclusions
Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
