ChatGPT 在土壤科学研究中的应用和印度尼西亚土壤科学家的看法

Destika Cahyana , Agus Hadiarto , Irawan , Diah Puspita Hati , Mira Media Pratamaningsih , Vicca Karolinoerita , Anny Mulyani , Sukarman , Muhammad Hikmat , Fadhlullah Ramadhani , Rachmat Abdul Gani , Edi Yatno , R. Bambang Heryanto , Suratman , Nuni Gofar , Abraham Suriadikusumah
{"title":"ChatGPT 在土壤科学研究中的应用和印度尼西亚土壤科学家的看法","authors":"Destika Cahyana ,&nbsp;Agus Hadiarto ,&nbsp;Irawan ,&nbsp;Diah Puspita Hati ,&nbsp;Mira Media Pratamaningsih ,&nbsp;Vicca Karolinoerita ,&nbsp;Anny Mulyani ,&nbsp;Sukarman ,&nbsp;Muhammad Hikmat ,&nbsp;Fadhlullah Ramadhani ,&nbsp;Rachmat Abdul Gani ,&nbsp;Edi Yatno ,&nbsp;R. Bambang Heryanto ,&nbsp;Suratman ,&nbsp;Nuni Gofar ,&nbsp;Abraham Suriadikusumah","doi":"10.1016/j.aiig.2024.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since its arrival in late November 2022, ChatGPT-3.5 has rapidly gained popularity and significantly impacted how research is planned, conducted, and published using a generative artificial intelligence approach. ChatGPT-4 was released four months later and became more popular in November 2023. However, there is little study about the perception of scientists of these chatbots, especially in soil science. This article presents the new findings of a brief research investigating soil scientists' responses and perceptions towards chatbots in Indonesia. This artificial intelligence application facilitates conversation-based interactions in text format. The study evaluated ten ChatGPT answers to fundamental questions in soil science, which has developed into a normal science with a mutually agreed-upon paradigm. The evaluation was carried out by seven soil scientists recognized for their expertise in Indonesia, using a scale of 1–100. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to soil scientists at the National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), universities, and Indonesian Soil Science Society (HITI) members to gauge their perception of ChatGPT's presence in the research field. The study results indicate that the scores of ChatGPT answers range from 82.99 to 92.24. ChatGPT-4 is better than both the paid and free versions of ChatGPT-3.5. There is no significant difference between the English and Indonesian versions of ChatGPT-4.0. However, the perception of general soil scientists about the level of trust is only 55%. Furthermore, 80% of soil scientists believe that chatbots can only be used as digital tools to assist in soil science research and cannot be used without the involvement of soil scientists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100124,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544124000194/pdfft?md5=a1f673f82f524163cc02389c4b2b6d47&pid=1-s2.0-S2666544124000194-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of ChatGPT in soil science research and the perceptions of soil scientists in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Destika Cahyana ,&nbsp;Agus Hadiarto ,&nbsp;Irawan ,&nbsp;Diah Puspita Hati ,&nbsp;Mira Media Pratamaningsih ,&nbsp;Vicca Karolinoerita ,&nbsp;Anny Mulyani ,&nbsp;Sukarman ,&nbsp;Muhammad Hikmat ,&nbsp;Fadhlullah Ramadhani ,&nbsp;Rachmat Abdul Gani ,&nbsp;Edi Yatno ,&nbsp;R. Bambang Heryanto ,&nbsp;Suratman ,&nbsp;Nuni Gofar ,&nbsp;Abraham Suriadikusumah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiig.2024.100078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Since its arrival in late November 2022, ChatGPT-3.5 has rapidly gained popularity and significantly impacted how research is planned, conducted, and published using a generative artificial intelligence approach. ChatGPT-4 was released four months later and became more popular in November 2023. However, there is little study about the perception of scientists of these chatbots, especially in soil science. This article presents the new findings of a brief research investigating soil scientists' responses and perceptions towards chatbots in Indonesia. This artificial intelligence application facilitates conversation-based interactions in text format. The study evaluated ten ChatGPT answers to fundamental questions in soil science, which has developed into a normal science with a mutually agreed-upon paradigm. The evaluation was carried out by seven soil scientists recognized for their expertise in Indonesia, using a scale of 1–100. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to soil scientists at the National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), universities, and Indonesian Soil Science Society (HITI) members to gauge their perception of ChatGPT's presence in the research field. The study results indicate that the scores of ChatGPT answers range from 82.99 to 92.24. ChatGPT-4 is better than both the paid and free versions of ChatGPT-3.5. There is no significant difference between the English and Indonesian versions of ChatGPT-4.0. However, the perception of general soil scientists about the level of trust is only 55%. Furthermore, 80% of soil scientists believe that chatbots can only be used as digital tools to assist in soil science research and cannot be used without the involvement of soil scientists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544124000194/pdfft?md5=a1f673f82f524163cc02389c4b2b6d47&pid=1-s2.0-S2666544124000194-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544124000194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544124000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2022 年 11 月底问世以来,ChatGPT-3.5 迅速受到欢迎,并极大地影响了使用生成式人工智能方法规划、开展和发布研究的方式。ChatGPT-4 在四个月后发布,并于 2023 年 11 月变得更加流行。然而,有关科学家对这些聊天机器人的看法的研究却很少,尤其是在土壤科学领域。本文介绍了一项简要研究的新发现,该研究调查了印度尼西亚土壤科学家对聊天机器人的反应和看法。这种人工智能应用促进了基于文本格式的对话式互动。该研究评估了十个 ChatGPT 对土壤科学基本问题的回答,土壤科学已经发展成为一门具有共同认可范式的正常科学。评估由印度尼西亚公认的七位土壤学家进行,他们的专业知识得到了认可,评估采用 1-100 分制。此外,还向印度尼西亚共和国国家研究与创新局(BRIN)、大学和印度尼西亚土壤科学学会(HITI)成员中的土壤科学家发放了调查问卷,以了解他们对 ChatGPT 在研究领域的存在的看法。研究结果表明,ChatGPT 答案的得分在 82.99 到 92.24 之间。ChatGPT-4 优于付费版和免费版的 ChatGPT-3.5。英文版和印尼语版的 ChatGPT-4.0 之间没有明显差异。然而,普通土壤科学家对信任度的认知度仅为 55%。此外,80% 的土壤科学家认为聊天机器人只能作为辅助土壤科学研究的数字工具,没有土壤科学家的参与就无法使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of ChatGPT in soil science research and the perceptions of soil scientists in Indonesia

Since its arrival in late November 2022, ChatGPT-3.5 has rapidly gained popularity and significantly impacted how research is planned, conducted, and published using a generative artificial intelligence approach. ChatGPT-4 was released four months later and became more popular in November 2023. However, there is little study about the perception of scientists of these chatbots, especially in soil science. This article presents the new findings of a brief research investigating soil scientists' responses and perceptions towards chatbots in Indonesia. This artificial intelligence application facilitates conversation-based interactions in text format. The study evaluated ten ChatGPT answers to fundamental questions in soil science, which has developed into a normal science with a mutually agreed-upon paradigm. The evaluation was carried out by seven soil scientists recognized for their expertise in Indonesia, using a scale of 1–100. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to soil scientists at the National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), universities, and Indonesian Soil Science Society (HITI) members to gauge their perception of ChatGPT's presence in the research field. The study results indicate that the scores of ChatGPT answers range from 82.99 to 92.24. ChatGPT-4 is better than both the paid and free versions of ChatGPT-3.5. There is no significant difference between the English and Indonesian versions of ChatGPT-4.0. However, the perception of general soil scientists about the level of trust is only 55%. Furthermore, 80% of soil scientists believe that chatbots can only be used as digital tools to assist in soil science research and cannot be used without the involvement of soil scientists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信