人脑面部和场景网络半球间连接的非对称性模式

Bartholomew P. A. Quinn, David M. Watson, Kira Noad, Timothy J. Andrews
{"title":"人脑面部和场景网络半球间连接的非对称性模式","authors":"Bartholomew P. A. Quinn, David M. Watson, Kira Noad, Timothy J. Andrews","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Neuroimaging studies have revealed a network of regions in both hemispheres of the human brain that respond selectively to faces. Neural models of face processing have typically focused on functional connectivity between regions in the same hemisphere (intrahemispheric), with a particular bias toward the right hemisphere. Here, we explored the role of interhemispheric connectivity using fMRI. We used three datasets to compare functional connectivity, as shown by correlations between the time-courses of neural activity of face regions during different natural viewing paradigms. We found higher correlations of neural activity between corresponding interhemispheric regions (e.g., rFFA–lFFA) than between intrahemispheric regions (e.g., rFFA–rOFA), indicating a bias towards higher interhemispheric than intrahemispheric connectivity. A similar interhemispheric bias was evident in scene-selective regions. In contrast, we did not find an interhemispheric bias in early visual regions (V1–V3), where intrahemispheric connectivity between corresponding regions was generally higher than interhemispheric connectivity. Next, we asked whether the higher interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks between corresponding regions was consistent across participants. We found that the interhemispheric bias was significantly attenuated when we compared the time-course of response across participants. This shows that interhemispheric bias in connectivity between corresponding regions in the face and scene networks is specific to the individual. These findings raise the possibility that idiosyncratic variation in interhemispheric connectivity may explain individual differences in perception.","PeriodicalId":507939,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Neuroscience","volume":"30 35","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idiosyncratic patterns of interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks of the human brain\",\"authors\":\"Bartholomew P. A. Quinn, David M. Watson, Kira Noad, Timothy J. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/imag_a_00181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Neuroimaging studies have revealed a network of regions in both hemispheres of the human brain that respond selectively to faces. Neural models of face processing have typically focused on functional connectivity between regions in the same hemisphere (intrahemispheric), with a particular bias toward the right hemisphere. Here, we explored the role of interhemispheric connectivity using fMRI. We used three datasets to compare functional connectivity, as shown by correlations between the time-courses of neural activity of face regions during different natural viewing paradigms. We found higher correlations of neural activity between corresponding interhemispheric regions (e.g., rFFA–lFFA) than between intrahemispheric regions (e.g., rFFA–rOFA), indicating a bias towards higher interhemispheric than intrahemispheric connectivity. A similar interhemispheric bias was evident in scene-selective regions. In contrast, we did not find an interhemispheric bias in early visual regions (V1–V3), where intrahemispheric connectivity between corresponding regions was generally higher than interhemispheric connectivity. Next, we asked whether the higher interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks between corresponding regions was consistent across participants. We found that the interhemispheric bias was significantly attenuated when we compared the time-course of response across participants. This shows that interhemispheric bias in connectivity between corresponding regions in the face and scene networks is specific to the individual. These findings raise the possibility that idiosyncratic variation in interhemispheric connectivity may explain individual differences in perception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"30 35\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 神经影像学研究揭示了人类大脑两半球对人脸做出选择性反应的区域网络。人脸处理的神经模型通常侧重于同一半球(半球内)区域之间的功能连接,尤其偏重于右半球。在这里,我们使用 fMRI 探索了半球间连接的作用。我们使用了三个数据集来比较功能连通性,具体表现为不同自然观看范式下人脸区域神经活动时间序列之间的相关性。我们发现相应的半球间区域(如 rFFA-lFFA)之间的神经活动相关性高于半球内区域(如 rFFA-rOFA)之间的相关性,这表明半球间的连通性高于半球内的连通性。类似的半球间偏向在场景选择区域也很明显。与此相反,我们在早期视觉区域(V1-V3)没有发现半球间偏向,在这些区域中,相应区域之间的半球内连通性普遍高于半球间连通性。接下来,我们询问在人脸和场景网络中,相应区域之间较高的半球间连通性在不同参与者中是否一致。我们发现,在比较不同参与者的反应时间过程时,大脑半球间的偏差明显减弱。这表明,人脸网络和场景网络中相应区域之间的半球间连接偏差是因人而异的。这些发现提出了一种可能性,即大脑半球间连通性的特异性变化可能解释了感知的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Idiosyncratic patterns of interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks of the human brain
Abstract Neuroimaging studies have revealed a network of regions in both hemispheres of the human brain that respond selectively to faces. Neural models of face processing have typically focused on functional connectivity between regions in the same hemisphere (intrahemispheric), with a particular bias toward the right hemisphere. Here, we explored the role of interhemispheric connectivity using fMRI. We used three datasets to compare functional connectivity, as shown by correlations between the time-courses of neural activity of face regions during different natural viewing paradigms. We found higher correlations of neural activity between corresponding interhemispheric regions (e.g., rFFA–lFFA) than between intrahemispheric regions (e.g., rFFA–rOFA), indicating a bias towards higher interhemispheric than intrahemispheric connectivity. A similar interhemispheric bias was evident in scene-selective regions. In contrast, we did not find an interhemispheric bias in early visual regions (V1–V3), where intrahemispheric connectivity between corresponding regions was generally higher than interhemispheric connectivity. Next, we asked whether the higher interhemispheric connectivity in the face and scene networks between corresponding regions was consistent across participants. We found that the interhemispheric bias was significantly attenuated when we compared the time-course of response across participants. This shows that interhemispheric bias in connectivity between corresponding regions in the face and scene networks is specific to the individual. These findings raise the possibility that idiosyncratic variation in interhemispheric connectivity may explain individual differences in perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信