示波法能否取代肺活量法成为肺功能测试的主要工具?- 概述

Jaymohan Unnithan, Srikanth Krishnamurthy, Nandagopal Velayuthaswamy, Nagarajan Srinivasan
{"title":"示波法能否取代肺活量法成为肺功能测试的主要工具?- 概述","authors":"Jaymohan Unnithan, Srikanth Krishnamurthy, Nandagopal Velayuthaswamy, Nagarajan Srinivasan","doi":"10.4103/japt.japt_1_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Developing countries face a huge challenge in managing obstructive lung disorders due to frequency, severity, management, and economic impact. Spirometry has been the popular choice to assess the severity and reversibility of airflow obstruction, but the success of evaluation depends on the practitioner’s skills and the patient’s cooperation. Impulse oscillometry (IOS), a variant of forced oscillation technique is preferred over spirometry since it can be performed without forced respiratory maneuvers. The objective of this review is to evaluate IOS techniques and weigh its benefits against spirometry. Publications from international electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using relevant keywords for 5 years (2018–2023). A total of 416 articles were filtered, and of these, 70 were selected which specifically discussed the principles, procedures, parameters, and interpretations of spirometry and oscillometry. From the full-text articles included, we have reflected on the history, defined, explained, compared, and contrasted spirometry and oscillometry methods to establish the versatility of oscillometry technique to identify small airway functions and its application in special clinical conditions. This review presents an easily comprehensible synthesis of oscillometry and spirometry bringing out the principles, advantages, and limitations that are suitable for a larger spectrum of healthcare and research community.","PeriodicalId":348236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Association of Pulmonologist of Tamil Nadu","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Oscillometry Replace Spirometry as a Major Tool for Lung Function Testing? – An Overview\",\"authors\":\"Jaymohan Unnithan, Srikanth Krishnamurthy, Nandagopal Velayuthaswamy, Nagarajan Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/japt.japt_1_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Developing countries face a huge challenge in managing obstructive lung disorders due to frequency, severity, management, and economic impact. Spirometry has been the popular choice to assess the severity and reversibility of airflow obstruction, but the success of evaluation depends on the practitioner’s skills and the patient’s cooperation. Impulse oscillometry (IOS), a variant of forced oscillation technique is preferred over spirometry since it can be performed without forced respiratory maneuvers. The objective of this review is to evaluate IOS techniques and weigh its benefits against spirometry. Publications from international electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using relevant keywords for 5 years (2018–2023). A total of 416 articles were filtered, and of these, 70 were selected which specifically discussed the principles, procedures, parameters, and interpretations of spirometry and oscillometry. From the full-text articles included, we have reflected on the history, defined, explained, compared, and contrasted spirometry and oscillometry methods to establish the versatility of oscillometry technique to identify small airway functions and its application in special clinical conditions. This review presents an easily comprehensible synthesis of oscillometry and spirometry bringing out the principles, advantages, and limitations that are suitable for a larger spectrum of healthcare and research community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Association of Pulmonologist of Tamil Nadu\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Association of Pulmonologist of Tamil Nadu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/japt.japt_1_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Association of Pulmonologist of Tamil Nadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/japt.japt_1_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于阻塞性肺部疾病的频率、严重程度、管理和经济影响,发展中国家在管理阻塞性肺部疾病方面面临着巨大的挑战。肺活量测定一直是评估气流阻塞严重程度和可逆性的常用方法,但评估的成功与否取决于医生的技术和患者的配合。脉冲振荡测量法(IOS)是强迫振荡技术的一种变体,与肺活量测量法相比更受青睐,因为它可以在不进行强迫呼吸操作的情况下进行。本综述旨在评估 IOS 技术,并权衡其与肺活量测定法的优势。使用相关关键词检索了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science等国际电子数据库中5年内(2018-2023年)的出版物。共筛选出 416 篇文章,并从中挑选出 70 篇专门讨论肺活量测定法和振荡测定法的原理、程序、参数和解释的文章。从收录的全文文章中,我们回顾了肺活量测定法和振荡测定法的历史,对其进行了定义、解释、比较和对比,从而确定了振荡测定法在确定小气道功能方面的多功能性及其在特殊临床条件下的应用。这篇综述对振荡测定法和肺活量测定法的原理、优势和局限性进行了简单易懂的综述,适用于更广泛的医疗保健和研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Oscillometry Replace Spirometry as a Major Tool for Lung Function Testing? – An Overview
Developing countries face a huge challenge in managing obstructive lung disorders due to frequency, severity, management, and economic impact. Spirometry has been the popular choice to assess the severity and reversibility of airflow obstruction, but the success of evaluation depends on the practitioner’s skills and the patient’s cooperation. Impulse oscillometry (IOS), a variant of forced oscillation technique is preferred over spirometry since it can be performed without forced respiratory maneuvers. The objective of this review is to evaluate IOS techniques and weigh its benefits against spirometry. Publications from international electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using relevant keywords for 5 years (2018–2023). A total of 416 articles were filtered, and of these, 70 were selected which specifically discussed the principles, procedures, parameters, and interpretations of spirometry and oscillometry. From the full-text articles included, we have reflected on the history, defined, explained, compared, and contrasted spirometry and oscillometry methods to establish the versatility of oscillometry technique to identify small airway functions and its application in special clinical conditions. This review presents an easily comprehensible synthesis of oscillometry and spirometry bringing out the principles, advantages, and limitations that are suitable for a larger spectrum of healthcare and research community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信