利用 A2 滴度进行 A2/A2B 死体供肾移植可提高肾移植的可及性:单中心研究

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Erik L. Lum , Afshin Pirzadeh , Nakul Datta , Gerald S. Lipshutz , Andrea M. McGonigle , Anum Hamiduzzaman , Natalie Bjelajac , Bethany Hale-Durbin , Suphamai Bunnapradist
{"title":"利用 A2 滴度进行 A2/A2B 死体供肾移植可提高肾移植的可及性:单中心研究","authors":"Erik L. Lum ,&nbsp;Afshin Pirzadeh ,&nbsp;Nakul Datta ,&nbsp;Gerald S. Lipshutz ,&nbsp;Andrea M. McGonigle ,&nbsp;Anum Hamiduzzaman ,&nbsp;Natalie Bjelajac ,&nbsp;Bethany Hale-Durbin ,&nbsp;Suphamai Bunnapradist","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of<!--> <!-->≤1:8 for IgG and<!--> <!-->≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ<sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542/pdfft?md5=92f55a86a71fc81898e1dda383ac65f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000542-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A2/A2B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using A2 Titers Improves Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Study\",\"authors\":\"Erik L. Lum ,&nbsp;Afshin Pirzadeh ,&nbsp;Nakul Datta ,&nbsp;Gerald S. Lipshutz ,&nbsp;Andrea M. McGonigle ,&nbsp;Anum Hamiduzzaman ,&nbsp;Natalie Bjelajac ,&nbsp;Bethany Hale-Durbin ,&nbsp;Suphamai Bunnapradist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of<!--> <!-->≤1:8 for IgG and<!--> <!-->≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ<sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542/pdfft?md5=92f55a86a71fc81898e1dda383ac65f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000542-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由& 目标2014年,A2/A2B已故捐献者肾移植选项被纳入肾脏分配系统,以改善B血型候选者的机会。尽管报告的结果很好,但全美中心的接受率仍然很低。在此,我们研究了在单个中心实施A2/A2B方案(IgG滴度≤1:8,IgM滴度≤1:16)对B血型肾移植受者的影响。设置&amp;参与者2019年1月1日至2022年12月期间,在单一中心接受已故供体肾移植的B型血受者.暴露根据供体血型对已故供体肾移植受者进行分析,比较A2/A2B与血型相合的受者。结果一年患者存活率、死亡删减后的同种异体移植功能、原发性无功能、延迟移植功能、使用血清肌酐水平衡量的同种异体移植功能和一年肾小球滤过率、活检证实的排斥反应以及浆液分离需求。分析方法A2/A2B组与相合组之间的比较采用Fisher检验或χ2检验进行分类变量分析,采用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验进行连续变量分析。结果在研究期间,共有104名B型血患者在本中心接受了死体肾移植,其中49人(47.1%)接受了A2/A2B移植。与血型匹配的受者相比,A2/A2B 受者的等待时间较短(57.9 个月 vs 74.7 个月,P = 0.01)。A2/A2B受者更有可能在心脏死亡后接受供体(24.5% vs 1.8%,P <0.05),并经历移植功能延迟(65.3% vs 41.8%)。在肾移植后1个月、3个月和1年的平均血清肌酐水平或估计肾小球滤过率、急性排斥反应或原发性无功能方面没有观察到差异。结论实施 A2/A2B 方案后,B 血型等待者的移植量增加了 83.6%,移植等待时间缩短了 22.5%,移植结果相似。在美国,B 型血患者等待肾移植的时间最长。少数族裔在 B 型血等待者中占很大比例,这也是肾移植率存在种族差异的原因之一。在这项研究中,接受 A2/A2B 血型不相容的肾脏与接受血型相容的肾脏相比,接受肾移植的时间几乎提前了 18 个月。接受 A2/A2B 肾脏的结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A2/A2B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using A2 Titers Improves Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Study

Rationale & Objective

The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of ≤1:8 for IgG and ≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.

Study Design

Retrospective observational study.

Setting & Participants

Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.

Exposure

Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.

Outcomes

One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.

Analytical Approach

Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ2 test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, P = 0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, P < 0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.

Limitations

Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.

Conclusions

Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.

Plain-Language Summary

Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信