Sneha Jethwani, Amit Benjamin, Sangeeta Muglikar, K. Nalawade, Aishwarya Kotkar
{"title":"二极管激光作为开瓣清创术的辅助手段与单纯开瓣清创术相比,对慢性牙周炎患者牙周治疗效果的临床评估 - 系统综述","authors":"Sneha Jethwani, Amit Benjamin, Sangeeta Muglikar, K. Nalawade, Aishwarya Kotkar","doi":"10.36106/ijsr/7107425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to compare and clinically evaluate the adjunctive benets of a diode laser (DL) to\nconventional open ap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. DL is an excelle Background: nt soft tissue surgical laser,\nindicated for soft tissue curettage or sulcular debridement with an additional bactericidal effect. Studies have been conducted to determine the\neffect of DL as an adjunct to OFD. There is limited documentation regarding the clinical effectiveness to prove adjunctive effect of OFD in the\nsurgical periodontal therapy. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing use of DL only in Methods: continuous and contact mode on\nundersurface of ap post-conventional OFD for treatment of chronic periodontitis in the test group were considered. Studies published only in\nEnglish language with follow-up periods of 3 and 6 months post-operatively and assessing probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attatchment\nlevel (CAL) as the outcomes were considered. A total of 6 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for\nassessing the risk of bias. 3/6 studies concluded that DL signicantly led to reduction in PPD or ga Results: in in CAL when used as adjunct to OFD.\nWhereas, other 3/6 studies concluded that DL did not signicantly lead to reduction in PPD or gain in CAL when used as adjunct to OFD.\nConclusion: DL can be used as an adjunct to standard treatments (OFD) of chronic periodontitis i.e; chronic periodontitis rather than as a\nreplacement for standard treatments.","PeriodicalId":14358,"journal":{"name":"International journal of scientific research","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF DIODE LASER AS AN ADJUNCT TO OPENFLAP DEBRIDEMENT AS COMPARED TO OPEN FLAP DEBRIDEMENT ALONE IN THE PERIODONTAL TREATMENT OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Sneha Jethwani, Amit Benjamin, Sangeeta Muglikar, K. Nalawade, Aishwarya Kotkar\",\"doi\":\"10.36106/ijsr/7107425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to compare and clinically evaluate the adjunctive benets of a diode laser (DL) to\\nconventional open ap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. DL is an excelle Background: nt soft tissue surgical laser,\\nindicated for soft tissue curettage or sulcular debridement with an additional bactericidal effect. Studies have been conducted to determine the\\neffect of DL as an adjunct to OFD. There is limited documentation regarding the clinical effectiveness to prove adjunctive effect of OFD in the\\nsurgical periodontal therapy. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing use of DL only in Methods: continuous and contact mode on\\nundersurface of ap post-conventional OFD for treatment of chronic periodontitis in the test group were considered. Studies published only in\\nEnglish language with follow-up periods of 3 and 6 months post-operatively and assessing probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attatchment\\nlevel (CAL) as the outcomes were considered. A total of 6 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for\\nassessing the risk of bias. 3/6 studies concluded that DL signicantly led to reduction in PPD or ga Results: in in CAL when used as adjunct to OFD.\\nWhereas, other 3/6 studies concluded that DL did not signicantly lead to reduction in PPD or gain in CAL when used as adjunct to OFD.\\nConclusion: DL can be used as an adjunct to standard treatments (OFD) of chronic periodontitis i.e; chronic periodontitis rather than as a\\nreplacement for standard treatments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of scientific research\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of scientific research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/7107425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of scientific research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/7107425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF DIODE LASER AS AN ADJUNCT TO OPENFLAP DEBRIDEMENT AS COMPARED TO OPEN FLAP DEBRIDEMENT ALONE IN THE PERIODONTAL TREATMENT OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to compare and clinically evaluate the adjunctive benets of a diode laser (DL) to
conventional open ap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. DL is an excelle Background: nt soft tissue surgical laser,
indicated for soft tissue curettage or sulcular debridement with an additional bactericidal effect. Studies have been conducted to determine the
effect of DL as an adjunct to OFD. There is limited documentation regarding the clinical effectiveness to prove adjunctive effect of OFD in the
surgical periodontal therapy. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing use of DL only in Methods: continuous and contact mode on
undersurface of ap post-conventional OFD for treatment of chronic periodontitis in the test group were considered. Studies published only in
English language with follow-up periods of 3 and 6 months post-operatively and assessing probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attatchment
level (CAL) as the outcomes were considered. A total of 6 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for
assessing the risk of bias. 3/6 studies concluded that DL signicantly led to reduction in PPD or ga Results: in in CAL when used as adjunct to OFD.
Whereas, other 3/6 studies concluded that DL did not signicantly lead to reduction in PPD or gain in CAL when used as adjunct to OFD.
Conclusion: DL can be used as an adjunct to standard treatments (OFD) of chronic periodontitis i.e; chronic periodontitis rather than as a
replacement for standard treatments.