PROMETHEE II 方法中偏好函数参数的敏感性分析和等级反转分析

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Xianliang Liu, Yunfei Liu
{"title":"PROMETHEE II 方法中偏好函数参数的敏感性分析和等级反转分析","authors":"Xianliang Liu,&nbsp;Yunfei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The PROMETHEE II method is a classical multiple criteria decision making method. However, it also exists the rank reversal which is a highly important problem for analyzing the reliability of a MCDM method. The main objective of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of the parameters for preference functions and the rank reversal problem in the PROMETHEE II method. By analyzing the parameters for preference functions from the standpoint of theoretics, a method is proposed to calculate the ranges of the parameters for four types of preference functions to remain the ranking of all the alternatives unchanged. Second, the sufficient and necessary condition of the rank reversal is obtained in the PROMETHEE II method when there are only three types of criteria, i.e., usual criteria, <span><math><mi>U</mi></math></span>-shape criteria and level criteria. Finally, two minor modification methods for the PROMETHEE II method itself are proposed by observing the net outranking flow formula. Numerical simulations show that the occurrence of the rank reversal is clearly reduced and the ranges of fault tolerance of the parameters for preference functions are significantly larger for each new modified PROMETHEE II method. The similarity of rankings is tested by using the similarity rank coefficient <span><math><mrow><mi>W</mi><mi>S</mi></mrow></math></span>. This indicates the rationality of the two proposed modifications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity analysis of the parameters for preference functions and rank reversal analysis in the PROMETHEE II method\",\"authors\":\"Xianliang Liu,&nbsp;Yunfei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The PROMETHEE II method is a classical multiple criteria decision making method. However, it also exists the rank reversal which is a highly important problem for analyzing the reliability of a MCDM method. The main objective of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of the parameters for preference functions and the rank reversal problem in the PROMETHEE II method. By analyzing the parameters for preference functions from the standpoint of theoretics, a method is proposed to calculate the ranges of the parameters for four types of preference functions to remain the ranking of all the alternatives unchanged. Second, the sufficient and necessary condition of the rank reversal is obtained in the PROMETHEE II method when there are only three types of criteria, i.e., usual criteria, <span><math><mi>U</mi></math></span>-shape criteria and level criteria. Finally, two minor modification methods for the PROMETHEE II method itself are proposed by observing the net outranking flow formula. Numerical simulations show that the occurrence of the rank reversal is clearly reduced and the ranges of fault tolerance of the parameters for preference functions are significantly larger for each new modified PROMETHEE II method. The similarity of rankings is tested by using the similarity rank coefficient <span><math><mrow><mi>W</mi><mi>S</mi></mrow></math></span>. This indicates the rationality of the two proposed modifications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PROMETHEE II 方法是一种经典的多重标准决策方法。然而,它也存在等级反转问题,这是分析多重标准决策制定方法可靠性的一个非常重要的问题。本研究的主要目的是分析 PROMETHEE II 方法中偏好函数参数和等级反转问题的敏感性。通过从理论角度分析偏好函数的参数,提出了一种方法来计算四种偏好函数的参数范围,以保持所有备选方案的排序不变。其次,在 PROMETHEE II 方法中得到了当标准只有三种(即通常标准、U 型标准和水平标准)时,排序逆转的充分必要条件。最后,通过观察净排名流公式,提出了对 PROMETHEE II 方法本身的两种微小修正方法。数值模拟结果表明,对于每一种新的修改后的 PROMETHEE II 方法来说,排名逆转的发生率明显降低,偏好函数参数的容错范围明显增大。使用相似度等级系数 WS 检验了排名的相似性。这表明这两种修改建议是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitivity analysis of the parameters for preference functions and rank reversal analysis in the PROMETHEE II method

The PROMETHEE II method is a classical multiple criteria decision making method. However, it also exists the rank reversal which is a highly important problem for analyzing the reliability of a MCDM method. The main objective of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of the parameters for preference functions and the rank reversal problem in the PROMETHEE II method. By analyzing the parameters for preference functions from the standpoint of theoretics, a method is proposed to calculate the ranges of the parameters for four types of preference functions to remain the ranking of all the alternatives unchanged. Second, the sufficient and necessary condition of the rank reversal is obtained in the PROMETHEE II method when there are only three types of criteria, i.e., usual criteria, U-shape criteria and level criteria. Finally, two minor modification methods for the PROMETHEE II method itself are proposed by observing the net outranking flow formula. Numerical simulations show that the occurrence of the rank reversal is clearly reduced and the ranges of fault tolerance of the parameters for preference functions are significantly larger for each new modified PROMETHEE II method. The similarity of rankings is tested by using the similarity rank coefficient WS. This indicates the rationality of the two proposed modifications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信