心脏手术后气管切开的最佳时机:描述性索赔数据库研究

{"title":"心脏手术后气管切开的最佳时机:描述性索赔数据库研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.04.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Suitable tracheostomy timing after cardiac operation remains controversial; hence, this study compared the effectiveness of early and late tracheostomy after cardiac operation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>By using the nationwide administrative claims database in Japan, patients who underwent cardiac operation between April 2010 and March 2020 were identified and included in this study. In-hospital mortality, incidence of deep sternal wound infection, and ventilator-free days were analyzed and compared by dividing patients into 2 groups: an early group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 1-14 days postoperatively) and a late group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 15-30 days postoperatively). Baseline characteristics were adjusted by propensity score weighting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1240 patients who underwent cardiac operation and postoperative tracheostomy, 784 were included in the main analysis cohort. As the number of days between the operation and tracheostomy increased, in-hospital mortality increased, whereas ventilator-free days decreased. The early and late groups comprised 284 and 326 patients, respectively. After adjustment of baseline characteristics, the in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; <em>P</em> = .01) was lower in the early group than in the late group, the incidence of deep sternal wound infection (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.23-1.52; <em>P</em> = .27) was not significantly different between the 2 groups, and the early group had more ventilator-free days compared with the late group (mean difference, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.6-6.5; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Early tracheostomy may be considered in patients expected to require prolonged ventilation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002134/pdfft?md5=1b3554c2bd274a8e02ee0c198dc9bc5d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124002134-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimum Timing of Tracheostomy After Cardiac Operation: Descriptive Claims Database Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.04.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Suitable tracheostomy timing after cardiac operation remains controversial; hence, this study compared the effectiveness of early and late tracheostomy after cardiac operation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>By using the nationwide administrative claims database in Japan, patients who underwent cardiac operation between April 2010 and March 2020 were identified and included in this study. In-hospital mortality, incidence of deep sternal wound infection, and ventilator-free days were analyzed and compared by dividing patients into 2 groups: an early group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 1-14 days postoperatively) and a late group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 15-30 days postoperatively). Baseline characteristics were adjusted by propensity score weighting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1240 patients who underwent cardiac operation and postoperative tracheostomy, 784 were included in the main analysis cohort. As the number of days between the operation and tracheostomy increased, in-hospital mortality increased, whereas ventilator-free days decreased. The early and late groups comprised 284 and 326 patients, respectively. After adjustment of baseline characteristics, the in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; <em>P</em> = .01) was lower in the early group than in the late group, the incidence of deep sternal wound infection (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.23-1.52; <em>P</em> = .27) was not significantly different between the 2 groups, and the early group had more ventilator-free days compared with the late group (mean difference, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.6-6.5; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Early tracheostomy may be considered in patients expected to require prolonged ventilation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002134/pdfft?md5=1b3554c2bd274a8e02ee0c198dc9bc5d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124002134-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心脏手术后气管切开的合适时机仍存在争议;因此,本研究比较了心脏手术后早期和晚期气管切开的效果。方法通过使用日本全国行政索赔数据库,确定并纳入了 2010 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受心脏手术的患者。将患者分为两组:早期组(术后 1-14 天接受气管切开术的患者)和晚期组(术后 15-30 天接受气管切开术的患者),分析并比较了院内死亡率、胸骨深伤口感染发生率和无呼吸机天数。结果 在接受心脏手术和术后气管切开术的 1240 名患者中,有 784 人被纳入主要分析队列。随着手术和气管切开术之间间隔天数的增加,院内死亡率上升,而无呼吸机天数下降。早期组和晚期组分别有 284 名和 326 名患者。调整基线特征后,早期组的院内死亡率(几率比,0.65;95% CI,0.46-0.91;P = .01)低于晚期组,胸骨深部伤口感染发生率(几率比,0.59;95% CI,0.23-1.52;P = .结论对于预计需要长期通气的患者,可以考虑早期气管切开术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimum Timing of Tracheostomy After Cardiac Operation: Descriptive Claims Database Study

Background

Suitable tracheostomy timing after cardiac operation remains controversial; hence, this study compared the effectiveness of early and late tracheostomy after cardiac operation.

Methods

By using the nationwide administrative claims database in Japan, patients who underwent cardiac operation between April 2010 and March 2020 were identified and included in this study. In-hospital mortality, incidence of deep sternal wound infection, and ventilator-free days were analyzed and compared by dividing patients into 2 groups: an early group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 1-14 days postoperatively) and a late group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 15-30 days postoperatively). Baseline characteristics were adjusted by propensity score weighting.

Results

Of 1240 patients who underwent cardiac operation and postoperative tracheostomy, 784 were included in the main analysis cohort. As the number of days between the operation and tracheostomy increased, in-hospital mortality increased, whereas ventilator-free days decreased. The early and late groups comprised 284 and 326 patients, respectively. After adjustment of baseline characteristics, the in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; P = .01) was lower in the early group than in the late group, the incidence of deep sternal wound infection (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.23-1.52; P = .27) was not significantly different between the 2 groups, and the early group had more ventilator-free days compared with the late group (mean difference, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.6-6.5; P < .001).

Conclusions

Early tracheostomy may be considered in patients expected to require prolonged ventilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信