仲裁法院的证据传票

A. Kurnosov
{"title":"仲裁法院的证据传票","authors":"A. Kurnosov","doi":"10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-2-241-252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International Commercial Arbitration is subject of Article 27, Law of the Russian Federation No. 5338‑1, July 07, 1993, while Arbitration Proceedings in the Russian Federation are described in Article 30, Federal Law No. 382-FZ of December 29, 2015. If a dispute settlement goes to institutional arbitration, a party or an arbitration court has the right to apply to a competent court with a subpoena of evidence. This article features the publication and execution of subpoena of evidence by arbitration court for the recovery of evidence. This category differs from other arbitration proceedings in that it requires a procedural appeal that initiates the proceedings, i.e., the subpoena of the arbitration court, and an applicant, i.e., the institutional arbitration court that is seeking assistance in the dispute. The author used the methods of teleological interpretation and functional analysis to justify the admissibility of normative provisions that exclude the right to issue a subpoena by ad hoc arbitrators and to send subpoena of evidence directly by the parties to the arbitration proceedings. The parties to the arbitration should be involved as interested parties. The applicant and the stakeholders have limited procedural rights and obligations since the court neither carries out jurisdictional activities nor considers the dispute per se, but coordinates assistance functions. As a result, some procedural shortcomings make it impossible to clarify the form and content of subpoena, as well as the type and content of documents that should be attached to it, e.g., an arbitration agreement, a state fee payment confirmation, a resolution on the arbitral panel, etc. The author also analyzed grounds for refusal to execute a subpoena of evidence. Excessive discretion and Delphic language should not violate the rights and legitimate interests of third parties, thus preventing them from participating in the arbitration.","PeriodicalId":512949,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":" 886","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subpoena of Evidence from Arbitration Court\",\"authors\":\"A. Kurnosov\",\"doi\":\"10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-2-241-252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International Commercial Arbitration is subject of Article 27, Law of the Russian Federation No. 5338‑1, July 07, 1993, while Arbitration Proceedings in the Russian Federation are described in Article 30, Federal Law No. 382-FZ of December 29, 2015. If a dispute settlement goes to institutional arbitration, a party or an arbitration court has the right to apply to a competent court with a subpoena of evidence. This article features the publication and execution of subpoena of evidence by arbitration court for the recovery of evidence. This category differs from other arbitration proceedings in that it requires a procedural appeal that initiates the proceedings, i.e., the subpoena of the arbitration court, and an applicant, i.e., the institutional arbitration court that is seeking assistance in the dispute. The author used the methods of teleological interpretation and functional analysis to justify the admissibility of normative provisions that exclude the right to issue a subpoena by ad hoc arbitrators and to send subpoena of evidence directly by the parties to the arbitration proceedings. The parties to the arbitration should be involved as interested parties. The applicant and the stakeholders have limited procedural rights and obligations since the court neither carries out jurisdictional activities nor considers the dispute per se, but coordinates assistance functions. As a result, some procedural shortcomings make it impossible to clarify the form and content of subpoena, as well as the type and content of documents that should be attached to it, e.g., an arbitration agreement, a state fee payment confirmation, a resolution on the arbitral panel, etc. The author also analyzed grounds for refusal to execute a subpoena of evidence. Excessive discretion and Delphic language should not violate the rights and legitimate interests of third parties, thus preventing them from participating in the arbitration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 886\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-2-241-252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-2-241-252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际商事仲裁适用 1993 年 7 月 7 日第 5338-1 号《俄罗斯联邦法》第 27 条,而俄罗斯联邦的仲裁程序则适用 2015 年 12 月 29 日第 382-FZ 号《联邦法》第 30 条。如果争议解决提交机构仲裁,当事人或仲裁法院有权向主管法院申请证据传票。本条介绍了仲裁法院为取回证据而公布和执行证据传票的情况。该类程序与其他仲裁程序的不同之处在于,它需要一个启动程序的程序上诉人,即仲裁法院的传票,以及一个申请人,即在争议中寻求协助的机构仲裁法院。作者使用了目的论解释和功能分析的方法来证明排除临时仲裁员发出传票的权利和由仲裁程序当事人直接发出证据传票的规范性条款的可接受性。仲裁各方应作为利害关系人参与。申请人和利害关系人在程序上的权利和义务有限,因为法院既不进行管辖活动,也不审议争议本身,而是协调援助职能。因此,一些程序上的缺陷导致无法明确传票的形式和内容,以及传票所附文件的类型和内容,如仲裁协议、国家费用支付确认书、仲裁小组决议等。作者还分析了拒绝执行证据传票的理由。过度的自由裁量权和德尔菲式的语言不应侵犯第三方的权利和合法利益,从而阻止他们参与仲裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subpoena of Evidence from Arbitration Court
International Commercial Arbitration is subject of Article 27, Law of the Russian Federation No. 5338‑1, July 07, 1993, while Arbitration Proceedings in the Russian Federation are described in Article 30, Federal Law No. 382-FZ of December 29, 2015. If a dispute settlement goes to institutional arbitration, a party or an arbitration court has the right to apply to a competent court with a subpoena of evidence. This article features the publication and execution of subpoena of evidence by arbitration court for the recovery of evidence. This category differs from other arbitration proceedings in that it requires a procedural appeal that initiates the proceedings, i.e., the subpoena of the arbitration court, and an applicant, i.e., the institutional arbitration court that is seeking assistance in the dispute. The author used the methods of teleological interpretation and functional analysis to justify the admissibility of normative provisions that exclude the right to issue a subpoena by ad hoc arbitrators and to send subpoena of evidence directly by the parties to the arbitration proceedings. The parties to the arbitration should be involved as interested parties. The applicant and the stakeholders have limited procedural rights and obligations since the court neither carries out jurisdictional activities nor considers the dispute per se, but coordinates assistance functions. As a result, some procedural shortcomings make it impossible to clarify the form and content of subpoena, as well as the type and content of documents that should be attached to it, e.g., an arbitration agreement, a state fee payment confirmation, a resolution on the arbitral panel, etc. The author also analyzed grounds for refusal to execute a subpoena of evidence. Excessive discretion and Delphic language should not violate the rights and legitimate interests of third parties, thus preventing them from participating in the arbitration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信