使用低全球升温潜能值替代制冷剂的变频操作分体式空调的实验和理论评估

Q3 Chemical Engineering
Ashish Shivkumar Utage, Kundlik Vitthal Mali, Heramb C. Phadake
{"title":"使用低全球升温潜能值替代制冷剂的变频操作分体式空调的实验和理论评估","authors":"Ashish Shivkumar Utage, Kundlik Vitthal Mali, Heramb C. Phadake","doi":"10.37934/arfmts.117.1.143154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents experimental evaluation and comparative analysis of low GWP alternative refrigerants, namely HC-290 (propane), HC-1270 (propylene), HC/HC-1270 blend, and HFC-32 (difluoro methane) as drop-in replacements for HCFC-22 (Chloro difluoro methane) in a typical 1.5 TR capacity inverter operated split type air conditioner (SAC). The experimental setup consisted of retrofitting an original HCFC-22 test unit following the soft optimization of the SAC system for each alternative refrigerant, followed by testing under controlled operating conditions as per the IS 1391, Part-1 standard at the half capacity and the rated capacity of inverter SAC. The results obtained were compared against the baseline HCFC-22 test unit. The optimized SAC gave EERIS (Indian Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio) of 4.63 for HC-290, 4.71 for HC-1270 and 4.87 for HC-290/HC-1270 blend, respectively increased by 8.94 %, 10.82 % and 14.58 % compared to HCFC-22. HFC-32 delivered the maximum cooling capacity of 6.78 kW, 3.67 % higher than baseline unit at the rated capacity. HC-290/HC-1270 blend exhibited the lowest power consumption and discharge temperature amongst all the refrigerants considered. The charge of flammable refrigerants has been optimized below LFL satisfying EN378 standard for the safety of inverter SAC in domestic applications.","PeriodicalId":37460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and Theoretical Assessment of Inverter-Operated Split Air Conditioner with Low GWP Alternative Refrigerants\",\"authors\":\"Ashish Shivkumar Utage, Kundlik Vitthal Mali, Heramb C. Phadake\",\"doi\":\"10.37934/arfmts.117.1.143154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents experimental evaluation and comparative analysis of low GWP alternative refrigerants, namely HC-290 (propane), HC-1270 (propylene), HC/HC-1270 blend, and HFC-32 (difluoro methane) as drop-in replacements for HCFC-22 (Chloro difluoro methane) in a typical 1.5 TR capacity inverter operated split type air conditioner (SAC). The experimental setup consisted of retrofitting an original HCFC-22 test unit following the soft optimization of the SAC system for each alternative refrigerant, followed by testing under controlled operating conditions as per the IS 1391, Part-1 standard at the half capacity and the rated capacity of inverter SAC. The results obtained were compared against the baseline HCFC-22 test unit. The optimized SAC gave EERIS (Indian Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio) of 4.63 for HC-290, 4.71 for HC-1270 and 4.87 for HC-290/HC-1270 blend, respectively increased by 8.94 %, 10.82 % and 14.58 % compared to HCFC-22. HFC-32 delivered the maximum cooling capacity of 6.78 kW, 3.67 % higher than baseline unit at the rated capacity. HC-290/HC-1270 blend exhibited the lowest power consumption and discharge temperature amongst all the refrigerants considered. The charge of flammable refrigerants has been optimized below LFL satisfying EN378 standard for the safety of inverter SAC in domestic applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.117.1.143154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemical Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.117.1.143154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了对低全球升温潜能值替代制冷剂(即 HC-290(丙烷)、HC-1270(丙烯)、HC/HC-1270 混合物和 HFC-32(二氟甲烷))的实验评估和比较分析,这些制冷剂可在典型的 1.5 TR 容量变频操作分体式空调器(SAC)中替代 HCFC-22(二氟氯甲烷)。实验设置包括在对每种替代制冷剂的分体式空调系统进行软优化后,对原有的 HCFC-22 测试装置进行改造,然后根据 IS 1391 第 1 部分标准,在变频分体式空调的半容量和额定容量的受控运行条件下进行测试。获得的结果与 HCFC-22 基准测试装置进行了比较。与 HCFC-22 相比,优化后的 SAC 的 EERIS(印度季节能效比)分别为 4.63(HC-290)、4.71(HC-1270)和 4.87(HC-290/HC-1270 混合物),分别提高了 8.94%、10.82% 和 14.58%。HFC-32 的最大制冷量为 6.78 千瓦,比额定制冷量下的基准设备高 3.67%。在所有制冷剂中,HC-290/HC-1270 混合物的耗电量和排放温度最低。易燃制冷剂的充注量已优化至低于 LFL,符合 EN378 标准,从而保证了家用变频 SAC 的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental and Theoretical Assessment of Inverter-Operated Split Air Conditioner with Low GWP Alternative Refrigerants
This article presents experimental evaluation and comparative analysis of low GWP alternative refrigerants, namely HC-290 (propane), HC-1270 (propylene), HC/HC-1270 blend, and HFC-32 (difluoro methane) as drop-in replacements for HCFC-22 (Chloro difluoro methane) in a typical 1.5 TR capacity inverter operated split type air conditioner (SAC). The experimental setup consisted of retrofitting an original HCFC-22 test unit following the soft optimization of the SAC system for each alternative refrigerant, followed by testing under controlled operating conditions as per the IS 1391, Part-1 standard at the half capacity and the rated capacity of inverter SAC. The results obtained were compared against the baseline HCFC-22 test unit. The optimized SAC gave EERIS (Indian Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio) of 4.63 for HC-290, 4.71 for HC-1270 and 4.87 for HC-290/HC-1270 blend, respectively increased by 8.94 %, 10.82 % and 14.58 % compared to HCFC-22. HFC-32 delivered the maximum cooling capacity of 6.78 kW, 3.67 % higher than baseline unit at the rated capacity. HC-290/HC-1270 blend exhibited the lowest power consumption and discharge temperature amongst all the refrigerants considered. The charge of flammable refrigerants has been optimized below LFL satisfying EN378 standard for the safety of inverter SAC in domestic applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences
Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
期刊介绍: This journal welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of fluid mechanics and thermal sciences relevant to engineering or the environment, multiphase and microscale flows, microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信