{"title":"导致荷斯坦弗里斯兰牛初产困难的一些环境因素","authors":"Arzu Özdemir","doi":"10.47115/bsagriculture.1459275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calving efficiency, an important target in cattle breeding, has been negatively affected by some environmental factors. Therefore, calving difficulty creates negative economic consequences. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between the first calving difficulty in Holstein Friesian (HF) cows in terms of management and origin factors. The material of the research consists of 1475 calving difficulty records from 5 different enterprises engaged in HF breeding, located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey, covering the years from 2013 to 2019. The scoring system used to determine calving difficulty: normal without intervention (ND), normal with intervention (MND), difficult/intervention with equipment (ZD), and abnormal birth (AD). Chi-square tests were performed. In the calving difficulty analysis, the management factor is classified as 1-2-3-4-5 and the origin of the cow is classified as 1 (foreign origin) and 2 (native origin). No findings were observed for MND scores. Total ND, ZD, and AD scores were 1250 (84.74%), 192 (13.01), and 33 (2.25%), respectively. Chi-square test was performed to test the differences among farms. Among the enterprises, the highest ND rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 90.07%, the minimum ZD rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 8.45%, and the AD rate was at least 0.66% in the 1st enterprise. The difference between farms was significant for calving difficulty (P","PeriodicalId":505200,"journal":{"name":"Black Sea Journal of Agriculture","volume":"118 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Environmental Factors Causing First Calving Difficulties in Holstein Friesian Cattle\",\"authors\":\"Arzu Özdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.47115/bsagriculture.1459275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Calving efficiency, an important target in cattle breeding, has been negatively affected by some environmental factors. Therefore, calving difficulty creates negative economic consequences. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between the first calving difficulty in Holstein Friesian (HF) cows in terms of management and origin factors. The material of the research consists of 1475 calving difficulty records from 5 different enterprises engaged in HF breeding, located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey, covering the years from 2013 to 2019. The scoring system used to determine calving difficulty: normal without intervention (ND), normal with intervention (MND), difficult/intervention with equipment (ZD), and abnormal birth (AD). Chi-square tests were performed. In the calving difficulty analysis, the management factor is classified as 1-2-3-4-5 and the origin of the cow is classified as 1 (foreign origin) and 2 (native origin). No findings were observed for MND scores. Total ND, ZD, and AD scores were 1250 (84.74%), 192 (13.01), and 33 (2.25%), respectively. Chi-square test was performed to test the differences among farms. Among the enterprises, the highest ND rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 90.07%, the minimum ZD rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 8.45%, and the AD rate was at least 0.66% in the 1st enterprise. The difference between farms was significant for calving difficulty (P\",\"PeriodicalId\":505200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Black Sea Journal of Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"118 47\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Black Sea Journal of Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1459275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Sea Journal of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1459275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some Environmental Factors Causing First Calving Difficulties in Holstein Friesian Cattle
Calving efficiency, an important target in cattle breeding, has been negatively affected by some environmental factors. Therefore, calving difficulty creates negative economic consequences. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between the first calving difficulty in Holstein Friesian (HF) cows in terms of management and origin factors. The material of the research consists of 1475 calving difficulty records from 5 different enterprises engaged in HF breeding, located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey, covering the years from 2013 to 2019. The scoring system used to determine calving difficulty: normal without intervention (ND), normal with intervention (MND), difficult/intervention with equipment (ZD), and abnormal birth (AD). Chi-square tests were performed. In the calving difficulty analysis, the management factor is classified as 1-2-3-4-5 and the origin of the cow is classified as 1 (foreign origin) and 2 (native origin). No findings were observed for MND scores. Total ND, ZD, and AD scores were 1250 (84.74%), 192 (13.01), and 33 (2.25%), respectively. Chi-square test was performed to test the differences among farms. Among the enterprises, the highest ND rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 90.07%, the minimum ZD rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 8.45%, and the AD rate was at least 0.66% in the 1st enterprise. The difference between farms was significant for calving difficulty (P