N. Y. Obedkova, A. A. Guslyakova, G. Mal, E. G. Obedkov
{"title":"解决残余心血管风险问题的当前趋势","authors":"N. Y. Obedkova, A. A. Guslyakova, G. Mal, E. G. Obedkov","doi":"10.21518/ms2024-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular mortality is an urgent health problem not only in the Russian Federation, but also throughout the world. Patients of high cardiovascular risk, which suffering from ischemic heart disease and attending dyslipidemia, remain with high residual risk of cardiovascular complications such as unstable angina, myocardial infarction, stroke even in the case of achieved target level of atherogenic lipoproteins, no matter effective multicomponent hypolipidemic therapy. This article reviews the relevant scientific literature, meta-analyses of studies, randomized clinical trials of lipid-lowering drugs, examines the main reasons for the persistence of residual cardiovascular risk, evaluates the role of each clinical diagnostic marker in its progression, among which are the level of lipoprotein (a), triglycerides and other atherogenic lipoproteins, persistent aseptic inflammation of the vascular wall, the markers of which are highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-1β. Possible therapeutic strategies for reducing residual risk depending on the etiological factor are discussed including the effectiveness in reducing residual cardiovascular risk with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, fibrates, options for RNA interference with small interfering RNA and antisense oligonucleotides usage, lipoprotein apheresis, as well as anti-inflammatory therapy using colchicine, low doses of methotrexate and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the production of proinflammatory interleukins. Assessing a patient’s residual risk in clinical practice allows us to determine the insufficiency or ineffectiveness of secondary prevention measures and choose a different, more modern or comprehensive tactic for cardiovascular risk reducing.","PeriodicalId":18391,"journal":{"name":"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council","volume":"120 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current trends in solving the problem of residual cardiovascular risk\",\"authors\":\"N. Y. Obedkova, A. A. Guslyakova, G. Mal, E. G. Obedkov\",\"doi\":\"10.21518/ms2024-115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiovascular mortality is an urgent health problem not only in the Russian Federation, but also throughout the world. Patients of high cardiovascular risk, which suffering from ischemic heart disease and attending dyslipidemia, remain with high residual risk of cardiovascular complications such as unstable angina, myocardial infarction, stroke even in the case of achieved target level of atherogenic lipoproteins, no matter effective multicomponent hypolipidemic therapy. This article reviews the relevant scientific literature, meta-analyses of studies, randomized clinical trials of lipid-lowering drugs, examines the main reasons for the persistence of residual cardiovascular risk, evaluates the role of each clinical diagnostic marker in its progression, among which are the level of lipoprotein (a), triglycerides and other atherogenic lipoproteins, persistent aseptic inflammation of the vascular wall, the markers of which are highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-1β. Possible therapeutic strategies for reducing residual risk depending on the etiological factor are discussed including the effectiveness in reducing residual cardiovascular risk with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, fibrates, options for RNA interference with small interfering RNA and antisense oligonucleotides usage, lipoprotein apheresis, as well as anti-inflammatory therapy using colchicine, low doses of methotrexate and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the production of proinflammatory interleukins. Assessing a patient’s residual risk in clinical practice allows us to determine the insufficiency or ineffectiveness of secondary prevention measures and choose a different, more modern or comprehensive tactic for cardiovascular risk reducing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council\",\"volume\":\"120 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心血管疾病死亡率不仅在俄罗斯联邦,在全世界都是一个紧迫的健康问题。患有缺血性心脏病并伴有血脂异常的心血管高危患者,即使在致动脉粥样硬化脂蛋白达到目标水平的情况下,无论采用何种有效的多成分降脂疗法,仍有很高的心血管并发症残留风险,如不稳定型心绞痛、心肌梗死、中风等。本文回顾了相关的科学文献、荟萃分析研究、降脂药物的随机临床试验,探讨了残余心血管风险持续存在的主要原因,评估了各临床诊断指标在其发展过程中的作用,其中包括脂蛋白(a)、甘油三酯和其他致动脉粥样硬化脂蛋白的水平,血管壁持续的无菌性炎症,其标志物是高敏 C 反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-1β。根据病因因素,讨论了降低残余风险的可能治疗策略,包括使用欧米伽-3 多不饱和脂肪酸、纤维素、使用小干扰 RNA 和反义寡核苷酸进行 RNA 干扰、脂蛋白清除术以及使用秋水仙碱、小剂量甲氨蝶呤和抑制促炎性白细胞介素产生的单克隆抗体进行抗炎治疗的有效性。在临床实践中评估患者的残余风险,可以让我们确定二级预防措施的不足或无效,并选择不同的、更现代或更全面的策略来降低心血管风险。
Current trends in solving the problem of residual cardiovascular risk
Cardiovascular mortality is an urgent health problem not only in the Russian Federation, but also throughout the world. Patients of high cardiovascular risk, which suffering from ischemic heart disease and attending dyslipidemia, remain with high residual risk of cardiovascular complications such as unstable angina, myocardial infarction, stroke even in the case of achieved target level of atherogenic lipoproteins, no matter effective multicomponent hypolipidemic therapy. This article reviews the relevant scientific literature, meta-analyses of studies, randomized clinical trials of lipid-lowering drugs, examines the main reasons for the persistence of residual cardiovascular risk, evaluates the role of each clinical diagnostic marker in its progression, among which are the level of lipoprotein (a), triglycerides and other atherogenic lipoproteins, persistent aseptic inflammation of the vascular wall, the markers of which are highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-1β. Possible therapeutic strategies for reducing residual risk depending on the etiological factor are discussed including the effectiveness in reducing residual cardiovascular risk with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, fibrates, options for RNA interference with small interfering RNA and antisense oligonucleotides usage, lipoprotein apheresis, as well as anti-inflammatory therapy using colchicine, low doses of methotrexate and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the production of proinflammatory interleukins. Assessing a patient’s residual risk in clinical practice allows us to determine the insufficiency or ineffectiveness of secondary prevention measures and choose a different, more modern or comprehensive tactic for cardiovascular risk reducing.