对目前国际上治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者建议的分析

A. L. Akopov
{"title":"对目前国际上治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者建议的分析","authors":"A. L. Akopov","doi":"10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-5-68-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of systemic antitumor treatment, targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) has changed the treatment outcome and prognosis for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Modern recommendations provide for the division of such patients into potentially resectable and unresectable, and such division does not always correspond to stage IIIa, IIIb or IIIc of the disease. The treatment of resectable tumors is recommended to start with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), followed by surgical intervention aimed at radical tumor removal only in patients who respond to treatment. For unresectable tumors, the best approach is considered to be simultaneous chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant ICI therapy, and the role of surgical interventions is limited to salvage surgery – residual tumor or local relapse removal after non-surgical self-treatment.This approach to the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC is unlikely to fully satisfy specialists and patients – there is no complete consensus on the definition of the term «resectability»; the possibility of converting an unresect able tumor into a resectable one as a result of neoadjuvant treatment is denied, which is contrary to clinical practice. The objective of the article was the critical analysis of existing recommendations on the role of the surgical approach as a stage of complex treatment of stage III NSCLC from the surgeon’s point of view.","PeriodicalId":108755,"journal":{"name":"Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery","volume":"123 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The analysis of current international recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer\",\"authors\":\"A. L. Akopov\",\"doi\":\"10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-5-68-75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of systemic antitumor treatment, targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) has changed the treatment outcome and prognosis for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Modern recommendations provide for the division of such patients into potentially resectable and unresectable, and such division does not always correspond to stage IIIa, IIIb or IIIc of the disease. The treatment of resectable tumors is recommended to start with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), followed by surgical intervention aimed at radical tumor removal only in patients who respond to treatment. For unresectable tumors, the best approach is considered to be simultaneous chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant ICI therapy, and the role of surgical interventions is limited to salvage surgery – residual tumor or local relapse removal after non-surgical self-treatment.This approach to the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC is unlikely to fully satisfy specialists and patients – there is no complete consensus on the definition of the term «resectability»; the possibility of converting an unresect able tumor into a resectable one as a result of neoadjuvant treatment is denied, which is contrary to clinical practice. The objective of the article was the critical analysis of existing recommendations on the role of the surgical approach as a stage of complex treatment of stage III NSCLC from the surgeon’s point of view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"123 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-5-68-75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-5-68-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全身抗肿瘤治疗、靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗(ICI)的发展改变了局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗结果和预后。现代建议将这类患者分为潜在可切除和不可切除两种,而这种划分并不总是与疾病的 IIIa、IIIb 或 IIIc 期相对应。对可切除肿瘤的治疗建议从新辅助化学免疫疗法(CIT)开始,只有对治疗有反应的患者才可进行旨在根治性切除肿瘤的手术治疗。对于无法切除的肿瘤,最佳方法被认为是同时进行化放疗(CRT),然后进行 ICI 辅助治疗,手术干预的作用仅限于挽救性手术--非手术自我治疗后切除残余肿瘤或局部复发。这种治疗III期NSCLC患者的方法不可能让专家和患者完全满意--对于 "可切除性 "一词的定义没有达成完全一致的意见;新辅助治疗的结果否认了将不可切除的肿瘤转化为可切除肿瘤的可能性,这与临床实践相悖。文章的目的是从外科医生的角度出发,批判性地分析了现有的关于手术方法在III期NSCLC复杂治疗阶段的作用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The analysis of current international recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer
The development of systemic antitumor treatment, targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) has changed the treatment outcome and prognosis for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Modern recommendations provide for the division of such patients into potentially resectable and unresectable, and such division does not always correspond to stage IIIa, IIIb or IIIc of the disease. The treatment of resectable tumors is recommended to start with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), followed by surgical intervention aimed at radical tumor removal only in patients who respond to treatment. For unresectable tumors, the best approach is considered to be simultaneous chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant ICI therapy, and the role of surgical interventions is limited to salvage surgery – residual tumor or local relapse removal after non-surgical self-treatment.This approach to the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC is unlikely to fully satisfy specialists and patients – there is no complete consensus on the definition of the term «resectability»; the possibility of converting an unresect able tumor into a resectable one as a result of neoadjuvant treatment is denied, which is contrary to clinical practice. The objective of the article was the critical analysis of existing recommendations on the role of the surgical approach as a stage of complex treatment of stage III NSCLC from the surgeon’s point of view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信