利用机器学习的偏差:预测医疗拒绝率

Stephen Russell, Fabio Montes Suros, Ashwin Kumar
{"title":"利用机器学习的偏差:预测医疗拒绝率","authors":"Stephen Russell, Fabio Montes Suros, Ashwin Kumar","doi":"10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a large healthcare system, ignoring costs associated with managing the patient encounter denial process (staffing, contracts, etc.), total denial-related amounts can be more than $1B annually in gross charges. Being able to predict a denial before it occurs has the potential for tremendous savings. Using machine learning to predict denial has the potential to allow denial-preventing interventions. However, challenges of data imbalance make creating a single generalized model difficult. We employ two biased models in a hybrid voting scheme to achieve results that exceed the state-of-the art and allow for incremental predictions as the encounter progresses. The model had the added benefit of monitoring the human-driven denial process that affect the underlying distribution, on which the models’ bias is based.","PeriodicalId":516827,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploiting Machine Learning Bias: Predicting Medical Denials\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Russell, Fabio Montes Suros, Ashwin Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a large healthcare system, ignoring costs associated with managing the patient encounter denial process (staffing, contracts, etc.), total denial-related amounts can be more than $1B annually in gross charges. Being able to predict a denial before it occurs has the potential for tremendous savings. Using machine learning to predict denial has the potential to allow denial-preventing interventions. However, challenges of data imbalance make creating a single generalized model difficult. We employ two biased models in a hybrid voting scheme to achieve results that exceed the state-of-the art and allow for incremental predictions as the encounter progresses. The model had the added benefit of monitoring the human-driven denial process that affect the underlying distribution, on which the models’ bias is based.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于大型医疗保健系统而言,如果不考虑与管理病人就诊拒绝流程相关的成本(人员配备、合同等),每年与拒绝相关的总费用可能超过 10 亿美元。如果能在拒付发生之前预测到拒付,就有可能节省大量费用。利用机器学习预测拒付有可能实现防止拒付的干预措施。然而,数据不平衡的挑战使得创建一个单一的通用模型变得困难。我们在一个混合投票方案中采用了两个有偏差的模型,从而获得了超越最先进技术的结果,并允许随着遭遇的进展进行增量预测。该模型的另一个好处是可以监控影响基本分布的人为驱动的拒绝过程,而模型的偏差正是建立在这一基础之上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploiting Machine Learning Bias: Predicting Medical Denials
For a large healthcare system, ignoring costs associated with managing the patient encounter denial process (staffing, contracts, etc.), total denial-related amounts can be more than $1B annually in gross charges. Being able to predict a denial before it occurs has the potential for tremendous savings. Using machine learning to predict denial has the potential to allow denial-preventing interventions. However, challenges of data imbalance make creating a single generalized model difficult. We employ two biased models in a hybrid voting scheme to achieve results that exceed the state-of-the art and allow for incremental predictions as the encounter progresses. The model had the added benefit of monitoring the human-driven denial process that affect the underlying distribution, on which the models’ bias is based.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信