反对理性胡安-巴勃罗-福纳与感性启蒙运动

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elsa Costa
{"title":"反对理性胡安-巴勃罗-福纳与感性启蒙运动","authors":"Elsa Costa","doi":"10.1111/1754-0208.12945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores Spain's positioning in the shifting currents of the later Enlightenment through the polemic works of lawyer and satirist Juan Pablo Forner. Forner's attempts to prove the existence of an autochthonous tradition of Spanish pragmatism and empiricism form an index of the penetration of intra-Enlightenment debates into Spanish thought in the late eighteenth century. Forner, profoundly aware of tensions between Cartesian rationalism and Lockean sentimental empiricism across Europe, intervenes on the side of empiricism, insisting that Cartesianism is nothing but a guise of Scholastic hyperrationalism. The article disputes scholarly perceptions of Forner as a Christian reactionary.</p>","PeriodicalId":55946,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","volume":"47 3","pages":"297-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against Reason: Juan Pablo Forner and the Enlightenment of Sentiment and Sensibility\",\"authors\":\"Elsa Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-0208.12945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explores Spain's positioning in the shifting currents of the later Enlightenment through the polemic works of lawyer and satirist Juan Pablo Forner. Forner's attempts to prove the existence of an autochthonous tradition of Spanish pragmatism and empiricism form an index of the penetration of intra-Enlightenment debates into Spanish thought in the late eighteenth century. Forner, profoundly aware of tensions between Cartesian rationalism and Lockean sentimental empiricism across Europe, intervenes on the side of empiricism, insisting that Cartesianism is nothing but a guise of Scholastic hyperrationalism. The article disputes scholarly perceptions of Forner as a Christian reactionary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"297-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12945\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过律师兼讽刺作家胡安-巴勃罗-福尔纳(Juan Pablo Forner)的论战作品,探讨了西班牙在启蒙运动后期不断变化的潮流中的定位。福尔纳试图证明西班牙实用主义和经验主义的本土传统的存在,是十八世纪末启蒙运动内部争论渗透到西班牙思想界的一个指标。福尔纳深刻地意识到整个欧洲笛卡尔理性主义与洛克感性经验主义之间的紧张关系,他站在经验主义一边,坚持认为笛卡尔主义不过是经院哲学超理性主义的伪装。文章对学术界将福尔纳视为基督教反动派的看法提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Against Reason: Juan Pablo Forner and the Enlightenment of Sentiment and Sensibility

This article explores Spain's positioning in the shifting currents of the later Enlightenment through the polemic works of lawyer and satirist Juan Pablo Forner. Forner's attempts to prove the existence of an autochthonous tradition of Spanish pragmatism and empiricism form an index of the penetration of intra-Enlightenment debates into Spanish thought in the late eighteenth century. Forner, profoundly aware of tensions between Cartesian rationalism and Lockean sentimental empiricism across Europe, intervenes on the side of empiricism, insisting that Cartesianism is nothing but a guise of Scholastic hyperrationalism. The article disputes scholarly perceptions of Forner as a Christian reactionary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信