为耳内入路耳科手术患者做好消毒和卫生准备

W. H. Suaifan, K. Eremeeva, S. V. Morozova
{"title":"为耳内入路耳科手术患者做好消毒和卫生准备","authors":"W. H. Suaifan, K. Eremeeva, S. V. Morozova","doi":"10.21518/ms2024-096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Optimization of preoperative preparation protocols in otosurgery can reduce intraand postoperative infectious complications, improve surgical outcomes, which is important for the rehabilitation of patients with ear diseases.Aim. To determine the effectiveness of antiseptic and hygienic preoperative preparation of the surgical field during endaural otosurgical interventions.Materials and methods. The randomized study included 183 patients who underwent surgery via the endaural approach. The first part of the study evaluated the effect of 10% povidone-iodine solution treatment on the skin microbiome; the second part evaluated the need for ear canal depilation and before surgery and compared the methods.Results. Examination of skin microbiota of the external auditory canal in 85% revealed the growth of microorganisms:Staphylococcus – 115 (85.5%), fungal growth – 6 (4.4%), Corynebacterium – 8 (5.9%), etc. Microbial growth was not detected in 15%. Antiseptic treatment with 10% Povidone-iodine solution with endaural access reduces the degree of contamination and suppresses the growth of microorganisms in more than one third of patients. Inflammatory changes of the postoperative wound correspond to the degree of inflammation IA in both control and study groups. After depilation, visualization was assessed as optimal in 100% of cases and no inflammatory reactions were found. Average depilation time with scissors 113 sec, with an ear trimmer 32 sec.Conclusions. Preoperative antiseptic preparation reduces microbial contamination of the skin via endaural access, with no significant impact on wound healing process in the postoperative period. Depilation improved the view of the operative field in 100% of cases. Depilation with an ear trimmer is 3.5 times faster than with scissors.","PeriodicalId":18391,"journal":{"name":"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council","volume":"43 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antiseptic and hygienic preparation of patients for ear surgery with an endaural approach\",\"authors\":\"W. H. Suaifan, K. Eremeeva, S. V. Morozova\",\"doi\":\"10.21518/ms2024-096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Optimization of preoperative preparation protocols in otosurgery can reduce intraand postoperative infectious complications, improve surgical outcomes, which is important for the rehabilitation of patients with ear diseases.Aim. To determine the effectiveness of antiseptic and hygienic preoperative preparation of the surgical field during endaural otosurgical interventions.Materials and methods. The randomized study included 183 patients who underwent surgery via the endaural approach. The first part of the study evaluated the effect of 10% povidone-iodine solution treatment on the skin microbiome; the second part evaluated the need for ear canal depilation and before surgery and compared the methods.Results. Examination of skin microbiota of the external auditory canal in 85% revealed the growth of microorganisms:Staphylococcus – 115 (85.5%), fungal growth – 6 (4.4%), Corynebacterium – 8 (5.9%), etc. Microbial growth was not detected in 15%. Antiseptic treatment with 10% Povidone-iodine solution with endaural access reduces the degree of contamination and suppresses the growth of microorganisms in more than one third of patients. Inflammatory changes of the postoperative wound correspond to the degree of inflammation IA in both control and study groups. After depilation, visualization was assessed as optimal in 100% of cases and no inflammatory reactions were found. Average depilation time with scissors 113 sec, with an ear trimmer 32 sec.Conclusions. Preoperative antiseptic preparation reduces microbial contamination of the skin via endaural access, with no significant impact on wound healing process in the postoperative period. Depilation improved the view of the operative field in 100% of cases. Depilation with an ear trimmer is 3.5 times faster than with scissors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council\",\"volume\":\"43 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介。优化耳科手术的术前准备方案可减少术中和术后感染并发症,改善手术效果,这对耳病患者的康复非常重要。目的:确定耳内手术干预期间手术野防腐和卫生术前准备的有效性。随机研究包括 183 名通过耳内法接受手术的患者。研究的第一部分评估了 10%聚维酮碘溶液治疗对皮肤微生物群的影响;第二部分评估了耳道脱毛的必要性和手术前的准备情况,并对两种方法进行了比较。85%的外耳道皮肤微生物群检查显示有微生物生长:葡萄球菌--115(85.5%)、真菌生长--6(4.4%)、棒状杆菌--8(5.9%)等。15%的病例未检测到微生物生长。使用 10%聚维酮碘溶液对硬膜内入路进行消毒处理,可降低污染程度,抑制三分之一以上患者的微生物生长。术后伤口的炎症变化与对照组和研究组的炎症IA程度一致。脱毛后,100% 的病例可视度均达到最佳,且未发现炎症反应。使用剪刀的平均脱毛时间为 113 秒,使用修耳器的平均脱毛时间为 32 秒。术前消毒准备可减少经耳内入路皮肤的微生物污染,对术后伤口愈合过程无明显影响。100%的病例都通过脱毛改善了手术视野。使用耳廓修剪器进行脱毛比使用剪刀快 3.5 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antiseptic and hygienic preparation of patients for ear surgery with an endaural approach
Introduction. Optimization of preoperative preparation protocols in otosurgery can reduce intraand postoperative infectious complications, improve surgical outcomes, which is important for the rehabilitation of patients with ear diseases.Aim. To determine the effectiveness of antiseptic and hygienic preoperative preparation of the surgical field during endaural otosurgical interventions.Materials and methods. The randomized study included 183 patients who underwent surgery via the endaural approach. The first part of the study evaluated the effect of 10% povidone-iodine solution treatment on the skin microbiome; the second part evaluated the need for ear canal depilation and before surgery and compared the methods.Results. Examination of skin microbiota of the external auditory canal in 85% revealed the growth of microorganisms:Staphylococcus – 115 (85.5%), fungal growth – 6 (4.4%), Corynebacterium – 8 (5.9%), etc. Microbial growth was not detected in 15%. Antiseptic treatment with 10% Povidone-iodine solution with endaural access reduces the degree of contamination and suppresses the growth of microorganisms in more than one third of patients. Inflammatory changes of the postoperative wound correspond to the degree of inflammation IA in both control and study groups. After depilation, visualization was assessed as optimal in 100% of cases and no inflammatory reactions were found. Average depilation time with scissors 113 sec, with an ear trimmer 32 sec.Conclusions. Preoperative antiseptic preparation reduces microbial contamination of the skin via endaural access, with no significant impact on wound healing process in the postoperative period. Depilation improved the view of the operative field in 100% of cases. Depilation with an ear trimmer is 3.5 times faster than with scissors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信