贝伐单抗作为治疗瘢痕疙瘩的辅助疗法:随机临床试验

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Zabihollah Shahmoradi, Roghayeh-Sadat Khalili-Tembi, Gita Faghihi, Awat Feizi,  Kimia Afshar, Bahareh Abtahi-Naeini
{"title":"贝伐单抗作为治疗瘢痕疙瘩的辅助疗法:随机临床试验","authors":"Zabihollah Shahmoradi,&nbsp;Roghayeh-Sadat Khalili-Tembi,&nbsp;Gita Faghihi,&nbsp;Awat Feizi,&nbsp; Kimia Afshar,&nbsp;Bahareh Abtahi-Naeini","doi":"10.1155/2024/1744375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Despite the availability of numerous therapies, keloid treatment remains a challenging clinical issue. Intralesional triamcinolone has been established as an effective corticosteroid treatment for keloids, while sporadic reports suggest the efficacy of intralesional verapamil. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant therapy for keloid treatment. <i>Methods</i>. This randomized controlled trial involved 38 patients diagnosed with keloid according to clinical criteria. The study compared the effects of intralesional triamcinolone combined with bevacizumab injections with intralesional triamcinolone alone. Patients were randomly assigned to either the combination treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® (20 mg/ml, every two weeks for three months) plus Avastin® (2.5 mg/ml, every two weeks for two months), or the single treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® alone. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used for serial photographic records of scar evaluation, with differences in VSS scores considered the primary outcome, and changes in height and patient satisfaction visual analog score (VAS) were secondary outcomes. <i>Results</i>. A total of 38 patients participated, with a mean age (SD) of 35.32 (14.02) years and 50% male. No significant differences in age, BMI, disease duration, gender, causing, family history, or site were observed between the two groups. The single treatment group exhibited a mean reduction of 0.60 (95% CI: (−1.18, −0.01); <i>P</i> = 0.045) in pigmentation score and a mean decrease of 1.37 (95% CI: (−2.68, −0.07); <i>P</i> = 0.039) in total score compared to the combination treatment group after three months of treatment. There was a significant reduction in keloid height in the combination group after the end of the treatment (<i>P</i> = 0.024). No significant differences in side effects were observed between the two groups. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our study demonstrates that bevacizumab can be considered an effective and safe adjuvant therapy option for keloid treatment, suggesting its potential as a promising treatment for the management of keloids. This trial is registered with IRCT20131119015455N5.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1744375","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bevacizumab as Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Keloid: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Zabihollah Shahmoradi,&nbsp;Roghayeh-Sadat Khalili-Tembi,&nbsp;Gita Faghihi,&nbsp;Awat Feizi,&nbsp; Kimia Afshar,&nbsp;Bahareh Abtahi-Naeini\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1744375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Despite the availability of numerous therapies, keloid treatment remains a challenging clinical issue. Intralesional triamcinolone has been established as an effective corticosteroid treatment for keloids, while sporadic reports suggest the efficacy of intralesional verapamil. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant therapy for keloid treatment. <i>Methods</i>. This randomized controlled trial involved 38 patients diagnosed with keloid according to clinical criteria. The study compared the effects of intralesional triamcinolone combined with bevacizumab injections with intralesional triamcinolone alone. Patients were randomly assigned to either the combination treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® (20 mg/ml, every two weeks for three months) plus Avastin® (2.5 mg/ml, every two weeks for two months), or the single treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® alone. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used for serial photographic records of scar evaluation, with differences in VSS scores considered the primary outcome, and changes in height and patient satisfaction visual analog score (VAS) were secondary outcomes. <i>Results</i>. A total of 38 patients participated, with a mean age (SD) of 35.32 (14.02) years and 50% male. No significant differences in age, BMI, disease duration, gender, causing, family history, or site were observed between the two groups. The single treatment group exhibited a mean reduction of 0.60 (95% CI: (−1.18, −0.01); <i>P</i> = 0.045) in pigmentation score and a mean decrease of 1.37 (95% CI: (−2.68, −0.07); <i>P</i> = 0.039) in total score compared to the combination treatment group after three months of treatment. There was a significant reduction in keloid height in the combination group after the end of the treatment (<i>P</i> = 0.024). No significant differences in side effects were observed between the two groups. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our study demonstrates that bevacizumab can be considered an effective and safe adjuvant therapy option for keloid treatment, suggesting its potential as a promising treatment for the management of keloids. This trial is registered with IRCT20131119015455N5.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1744375\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1744375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1744375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。尽管有许多治疗方法,但瘢痕疙瘩的治疗仍然是一个具有挑战性的临床问题。三苯氧胺已被确定为治疗瘢痕疙瘩的有效皮质类固醇激素,而一些零星报道则表明维拉帕米有一定疗效。本研究旨在评估贝伐单抗作为瘢痕疙瘩辅助疗法的安全性和有效性。研究方法这项随机对照试验涉及 38 名根据临床标准确诊为瘢痕疙瘩的患者。研究比较了三苯氧胺鞘内注射联合贝伐单抗与单独三苯氧胺鞘内注射的效果。患者被随机分配到联合治疗组和单一治疗组,前者接受曲安奈德®(20 毫克/毫升,每两周一次,持续三个月)和阿瓦斯汀®(2.5 毫克/毫升,每两周一次,持续两个月)注射,后者仅接受曲安奈德®注射。采用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)对疤痕评估进行连续拍照记录,VSS评分的差异被视为主要结果,高度和患者满意度视觉模拟评分(VAS)的变化被视为次要结果。结果。共有 38 名患者参与,平均年龄(标清)为 35.32(14.02)岁,50% 为男性。两组患者在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、病程、性别、病因、家族史或发病部位等方面均无明显差异。治疗三个月后,与联合治疗组相比,单一治疗组的色素沉着评分平均降低了 0.60(95% CI:(-1.18,-0.01);P=0.045),总评分平均降低了 1.37(95% CI:(-2.68,-0.07);P=0.039)。治疗结束后,联合治疗组的瘢痕疙瘩高度明显降低(P=0.024)。两组在副作用方面无明显差异。结论我们的研究表明,贝伐珠单抗可被视为治疗瘢痕疙瘩的一种有效而安全的辅助治疗方案,这表明贝伐珠单抗具有治疗瘢痕疙瘩的潜力。该试验已注册为 IRCT20131119015455N5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bevacizumab as Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Keloid: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bevacizumab as Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Keloid: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background. Despite the availability of numerous therapies, keloid treatment remains a challenging clinical issue. Intralesional triamcinolone has been established as an effective corticosteroid treatment for keloids, while sporadic reports suggest the efficacy of intralesional verapamil. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant therapy for keloid treatment. Methods. This randomized controlled trial involved 38 patients diagnosed with keloid according to clinical criteria. The study compared the effects of intralesional triamcinolone combined with bevacizumab injections with intralesional triamcinolone alone. Patients were randomly assigned to either the combination treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® (20 mg/ml, every two weeks for three months) plus Avastin® (2.5 mg/ml, every two weeks for two months), or the single treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® alone. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used for serial photographic records of scar evaluation, with differences in VSS scores considered the primary outcome, and changes in height and patient satisfaction visual analog score (VAS) were secondary outcomes. Results. A total of 38 patients participated, with a mean age (SD) of 35.32 (14.02) years and 50% male. No significant differences in age, BMI, disease duration, gender, causing, family history, or site were observed between the two groups. The single treatment group exhibited a mean reduction of 0.60 (95% CI: (−1.18, −0.01); P = 0.045) in pigmentation score and a mean decrease of 1.37 (95% CI: (−2.68, −0.07); P = 0.039) in total score compared to the combination treatment group after three months of treatment. There was a significant reduction in keloid height in the combination group after the end of the treatment (P = 0.024). No significant differences in side effects were observed between the two groups. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that bevacizumab can be considered an effective and safe adjuvant therapy option for keloid treatment, suggesting its potential as a promising treatment for the management of keloids. This trial is registered with IRCT20131119015455N5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Therapy
Dermatologic Therapy 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信