逐渐消失的全球化破坏了互联互通:从网络角度看国际贸易的最新发展

T. C. Silva, P. V. B. Wilhelm, D. R. Amancio
{"title":"逐渐消失的全球化破坏了互联互通:从网络角度看国际贸易的最新发展","authors":"T. C. Silva, P. V. B. Wilhelm, D. R. Amancio","doi":"10.1088/2632-072x/ad4dfc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The post-World War II decades experienced rapid growth in international trade, but recently a trend of weakening globalization has been consolidating. We construct an International Trade Network (ITN) using bilateral trade (2010 to 2022) to assess how interconnectedness has evolved in the face of recent developments. Our analysis reveals that while network connectivity initially improved, there was a shift towards a negative trend from 2018, coinciding with an increasingly unfavorable environment for international trade. We also document significant changes in the roles of countries within the ITN. While the USA remains the primary hub and China solidifies its second position, key countries like Germany, France, Great Britain, and Japan have notably lost relevance, whereas nations like India and the Republic of Korea are gaining prominence. Finally, employing an econometric model, we show that countries with large economies, significant manufacturing sector, lower inward foreign direct investment stock, and economic and geopolitical stability tend to occupy more central positions in the ITN.","PeriodicalId":516285,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics: Complexity","volume":"26 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interconnectivity disrupted by fading globalization: A network approach to recent international trade developments\",\"authors\":\"T. C. Silva, P. V. B. Wilhelm, D. R. Amancio\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2632-072x/ad4dfc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The post-World War II decades experienced rapid growth in international trade, but recently a trend of weakening globalization has been consolidating. We construct an International Trade Network (ITN) using bilateral trade (2010 to 2022) to assess how interconnectedness has evolved in the face of recent developments. Our analysis reveals that while network connectivity initially improved, there was a shift towards a negative trend from 2018, coinciding with an increasingly unfavorable environment for international trade. We also document significant changes in the roles of countries within the ITN. While the USA remains the primary hub and China solidifies its second position, key countries like Germany, France, Great Britain, and Japan have notably lost relevance, whereas nations like India and the Republic of Korea are gaining prominence. Finally, employing an econometric model, we show that countries with large economies, significant manufacturing sector, lower inward foreign direct investment stock, and economic and geopolitical stability tend to occupy more central positions in the ITN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics: Complexity\",\"volume\":\"26 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics: Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072x/ad4dfc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics: Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072x/ad4dfc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二战后的几十年间,国际贸易快速增长,但最近全球化减弱的趋势不断巩固。我们利用双边贸易(2010 年至 2022 年)构建了国际贸易网络(ITN),以评估面对近期的发展,相互联系是如何演变的。我们的分析表明,虽然网络连通性最初有所改善,但从 2018 年开始,网络连通性转为负面趋势,这与日益不利的国际贸易环境相吻合。我们还记录了各国在 ITN 中角色的重大变化。虽然美国仍是主要枢纽,中国的第二地位得到巩固,但德国、法国、英国和日本等主要国家的相关性明显下降,而印度和大韩民国等国家的地位日益突出。最后,我们利用计量经济学模型表明,经济规模大、制造业发达、外来直接投资存量较低、经济和地缘政治稳定的国家往往在 ITN 中占据更重要的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interconnectivity disrupted by fading globalization: A network approach to recent international trade developments
The post-World War II decades experienced rapid growth in international trade, but recently a trend of weakening globalization has been consolidating. We construct an International Trade Network (ITN) using bilateral trade (2010 to 2022) to assess how interconnectedness has evolved in the face of recent developments. Our analysis reveals that while network connectivity initially improved, there was a shift towards a negative trend from 2018, coinciding with an increasingly unfavorable environment for international trade. We also document significant changes in the roles of countries within the ITN. While the USA remains the primary hub and China solidifies its second position, key countries like Germany, France, Great Britain, and Japan have notably lost relevance, whereas nations like India and the Republic of Korea are gaining prominence. Finally, employing an econometric model, we show that countries with large economies, significant manufacturing sector, lower inward foreign direct investment stock, and economic and geopolitical stability tend to occupy more central positions in the ITN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信