地形对体波极化和近表面波速估算的影响

Yuanshen Li, Sunyoung Park
{"title":"地形对体波极化和近表面波速估算的影响","authors":"Yuanshen Li, Sunyoung Park","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.","PeriodicalId":502458,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topographic Effect on Body-Wave Polarization and Near-Surface Wave Speed Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Yuanshen Li, Sunyoung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了地形对体波极化的影响,以及随后对近表面波速度估算的影响。我们首先推导了地面倾斜情况下的三维 P 波和 S 波极化角,其中极化角是地面倾斜方向、近地表波速和入射波方向的函数。我们发现,当入射角接近临界角时,S 波极化角变化很大(例如,超过 100%)。在地表平坦的情况下,P 波极化只对 S 波速度敏感,而对 P 波速度不敏感,这种与直觉相反的现象在地面倾斜的情况下被打破,即 P 波极化对 P 波和 S 波速度都变得敏感。通过研究使用和不使用平坦表面假设时推断波速的差异,可以发现,一般来说,入射角度越小,波速估计值的偏差就越大,例如,地面倾斜度为 15○和接近垂直(5○)时,偏差约为 50%或更高。此外,我们的附加测试表明,与忽略倾斜效应时相比,将 S 波极化数据与倾斜考虑在一起将显著提高近地表波速估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topographic Effect on Body-Wave Polarization and Near-Surface Wave Speed Estimation
This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信