参与 PT 的风险分析方法

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ian Mann
{"title":"参与 PT 的风险分析方法","authors":"Ian Mann","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01596-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The standards ISO/IEC 17025 [1] and ISO 15189 [2] both require laboratories to monitor their performance by comparison with results of other laboratories. But to what extent do laboratories have to participate. At what level and which frequency should a laboratory participate in PT schemes? To facilitate this question, a risk analysis approach should be applied by the laboratory. The EA (European co-operation for Accreditation) advisory document EA-4/18 (Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation) [3] first published in June 2010 was revised in 2021 to include as one of the objectives, the concept of the risk analysis approach for PT participation. Risk analysis can be a nebulous concept so how can it be applied to PT participation? What criteria are important to take into consideration, can it be standardized, how do you train assessors to assess the suitability of a participation in PT strategy based on a risk analysis approach? To obtain feedback to such questions above, a survey was prepared and sent out to the EA accreditation bodies (Abs) to understand how this risk analysis approach is being implemented in their jurisdictions. In this survey, the following questions were posed:</p><ul>\n <li>\n <p>Are common risk-based principles used?</p>\n </li>\n <li>\n <p>What training is given to the assessors to ensure harmonization?</p>\n </li>\n <li>\n <p>What are the mains risks that are considered?</p>\n </li>\n <li>\n <p>At what frequency is the suitability of the laboratory’s risk-based approach (strategy) assessed?</p>\n </li>\n </ul></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 5-6","pages":"415 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk analysis approach for PT participation\",\"authors\":\"Ian Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-024-01596-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The standards ISO/IEC 17025 [1] and ISO 15189 [2] both require laboratories to monitor their performance by comparison with results of other laboratories. But to what extent do laboratories have to participate. At what level and which frequency should a laboratory participate in PT schemes? To facilitate this question, a risk analysis approach should be applied by the laboratory. The EA (European co-operation for Accreditation) advisory document EA-4/18 (Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation) [3] first published in June 2010 was revised in 2021 to include as one of the objectives, the concept of the risk analysis approach for PT participation. Risk analysis can be a nebulous concept so how can it be applied to PT participation? What criteria are important to take into consideration, can it be standardized, how do you train assessors to assess the suitability of a participation in PT strategy based on a risk analysis approach? To obtain feedback to such questions above, a survey was prepared and sent out to the EA accreditation bodies (Abs) to understand how this risk analysis approach is being implemented in their jurisdictions. In this survey, the following questions were posed:</p><ul>\\n <li>\\n <p>Are common risk-based principles used?</p>\\n </li>\\n <li>\\n <p>What training is given to the assessors to ensure harmonization?</p>\\n </li>\\n <li>\\n <p>What are the mains risks that are considered?</p>\\n </li>\\n <li>\\n <p>At what frequency is the suitability of the laboratory’s risk-based approach (strategy) assessed?</p>\\n </li>\\n </ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"29 5-6\",\"pages\":\"415 - 417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01596-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01596-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ISO/IEC 17025[1]和ISO 15189[2]标准都要求实验室通过与其他实验室的结果进行比较来监测其表现。但是实验室要参与到什么程度呢?实验室应以何种程度和频率参与PT计划?为了方便解决这个问题,实验室应该采用风险分析方法。2010年6月首次发布的EA(欧洲认证合作)咨询文件EA-4/18(参与能力测试的水平和频率指南)[3]于2021年进行了修订,将参与能力测试的风险分析方法概念作为目标之一。风险分析可能是一个模糊的概念,那么如何将其应用于PT参与?需要考虑的重要标准是什么,它是否可以标准化,您如何培训评估人员以评估基于风险分析方法的PT策略参与的适用性?为了获得对上述问题的反馈,我们准备了一份调查,并将其发送给EA认证机构(Abs),以了解这种风险分析方法在其管辖范围内的实施情况。在这项调查中,提出了以下问题:是否使用了基于风险的通用原则?对评审人员进行了哪些培训以确保协调?所考虑的主要风险有哪些?以什么频率评估实验室基于风险的方法(策略)的适宜性?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk analysis approach for PT participation

The standards ISO/IEC 17025 [1] and ISO 15189 [2] both require laboratories to monitor their performance by comparison with results of other laboratories. But to what extent do laboratories have to participate. At what level and which frequency should a laboratory participate in PT schemes? To facilitate this question, a risk analysis approach should be applied by the laboratory. The EA (European co-operation for Accreditation) advisory document EA-4/18 (Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation) [3] first published in June 2010 was revised in 2021 to include as one of the objectives, the concept of the risk analysis approach for PT participation. Risk analysis can be a nebulous concept so how can it be applied to PT participation? What criteria are important to take into consideration, can it be standardized, how do you train assessors to assess the suitability of a participation in PT strategy based on a risk analysis approach? To obtain feedback to such questions above, a survey was prepared and sent out to the EA accreditation bodies (Abs) to understand how this risk analysis approach is being implemented in their jurisdictions. In this survey, the following questions were posed:

  • Are common risk-based principles used?

  • What training is given to the assessors to ensure harmonization?

  • What are the mains risks that are considered?

  • At what frequency is the suitability of the laboratory’s risk-based approach (strategy) assessed?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信