在韩国学前教师样本中评估贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)的因子结构和结构效度

Yang-Eun Kim, Boram Lee
{"title":"在韩国学前教师样本中评估贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)的因子结构和结构效度","authors":"Yang-Eun Kim, Boram Lee","doi":"10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2402224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preschool teachers are at high risk of depression. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on evaluating a valid and reliable instrument to measure depressive symptomatology for this population. One such promising instrument is the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), a 21-item self-report measure designed to assess the presence and severity of depression. Although the tool’s psychometric properties have been analyzed in different samples, they have not been validated with a Korean preschool teacher sample. Hence, this study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the BDI-II in a sample of Korean preschool teachers. The study participants comprised 252 Korean preschool teachers (243 women and 9 men) with an average age of 33.5 years (SD = 10.3, range = 21-59). The participants completed the Korean version of the BDI-II online. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the psychometric properties of the BDI-II. Six models based on the literature were tested, including single-factor, correlated two- and three-factor, and bifactor models. The reliability and validity of the BDI-II were also analyzed. The bifactor model demonstrated the best data fit with an overarching vital general depression factor that coexists with comparatively weak specific cognitive, affective, and somatic factors. Internal consistency, measured using McDonald’s omega coefficients, was adequate in all cases. Using a validated screening instrument such as the BDI-II may allow clinicians to better detect depression among preschool teachers because of its conciseness and satisfactory psychometric properties. Since a bifactor model confirmed the unidimensionality of the BDI-II, the scores of specific factors should not be used in isolation. However, clinical assessment may benefit from its subscales if they are used in conjunction with total scores.","PeriodicalId":74334,"journal":{"name":"OBM neurobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in a Korean Preschool Teacher Sample\",\"authors\":\"Yang-Eun Kim, Boram Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2402224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preschool teachers are at high risk of depression. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on evaluating a valid and reliable instrument to measure depressive symptomatology for this population. One such promising instrument is the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), a 21-item self-report measure designed to assess the presence and severity of depression. Although the tool’s psychometric properties have been analyzed in different samples, they have not been validated with a Korean preschool teacher sample. Hence, this study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the BDI-II in a sample of Korean preschool teachers. The study participants comprised 252 Korean preschool teachers (243 women and 9 men) with an average age of 33.5 years (SD = 10.3, range = 21-59). The participants completed the Korean version of the BDI-II online. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the psychometric properties of the BDI-II. Six models based on the literature were tested, including single-factor, correlated two- and three-factor, and bifactor models. The reliability and validity of the BDI-II were also analyzed. The bifactor model demonstrated the best data fit with an overarching vital general depression factor that coexists with comparatively weak specific cognitive, affective, and somatic factors. Internal consistency, measured using McDonald’s omega coefficients, was adequate in all cases. Using a validated screening instrument such as the BDI-II may allow clinicians to better detect depression among preschool teachers because of its conciseness and satisfactory psychometric properties. Since a bifactor model confirmed the unidimensionality of the BDI-II, the scores of specific factors should not be used in isolation. However, clinical assessment may benefit from its subscales if they are used in conjunction with total scores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OBM neurobiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OBM neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2402224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2402224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学前教师是抑郁症的高危人群。因此,重点应放在评估一种有效可靠的工具上,以测量这一人群的抑郁症状。贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)就是这样一种很有前途的工具,它是一种由 21 个项目组成的自我报告量表,旨在评估抑郁的存在和严重程度。虽然该工具的心理测量特性已在不同样本中进行过分析,但尚未在韩国学前教师样本中进行过验证。因此,本研究试图在韩国学前教师样本中评估韩文版 BDI-II 的心理测量特性。研究对象包括 252 名韩国学前教师(243 名女性和 9 名男性),平均年龄为 33.5 岁(SD = 10.3,范围 = 21-59)。参与者在线完成了韩国版的 BDI-II 表。为了检验 BDI-II 的心理测量特性,我们进行了确认性因子分析。根据文献对六个模型进行了测试,包括单因素模型、相关双因素模型、三因素模型和双因素模型。同时还分析了 BDI-II 的信度和效度。双因素模型显示出最佳的数据拟合度,它是一个至关重要的总体抑郁因素,与相对较弱的特定认知、情感和躯体因素共存。使用麦克唐纳欧米茄系数测量的内部一致性在所有情况下都是适当的。使用像 BDI-II 这样经过验证的筛查工具可以让临床医生更好地发现学前教师中的抑郁症,因为它简洁明了,心理测量特性令人满意。由于双因子模型证实了 BDI-II 的单维性,因此不应孤立地使用特定因子的得分。不过,如果将其分量表与总分结合使用,临床评估可能会从分量表中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in a Korean Preschool Teacher Sample
Preschool teachers are at high risk of depression. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on evaluating a valid and reliable instrument to measure depressive symptomatology for this population. One such promising instrument is the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), a 21-item self-report measure designed to assess the presence and severity of depression. Although the tool’s psychometric properties have been analyzed in different samples, they have not been validated with a Korean preschool teacher sample. Hence, this study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the BDI-II in a sample of Korean preschool teachers. The study participants comprised 252 Korean preschool teachers (243 women and 9 men) with an average age of 33.5 years (SD = 10.3, range = 21-59). The participants completed the Korean version of the BDI-II online. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the psychometric properties of the BDI-II. Six models based on the literature were tested, including single-factor, correlated two- and three-factor, and bifactor models. The reliability and validity of the BDI-II were also analyzed. The bifactor model demonstrated the best data fit with an overarching vital general depression factor that coexists with comparatively weak specific cognitive, affective, and somatic factors. Internal consistency, measured using McDonald’s omega coefficients, was adequate in all cases. Using a validated screening instrument such as the BDI-II may allow clinicians to better detect depression among preschool teachers because of its conciseness and satisfactory psychometric properties. Since a bifactor model confirmed the unidimensionality of the BDI-II, the scores of specific factors should not be used in isolation. However, clinical assessment may benefit from its subscales if they are used in conjunction with total scores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信