转诊至急诊科的患者在骨科手术过程中不同酮洛酚程序镇静和镇痛剂量的比较:双盲随机临床试验

Saeed Abbasi, Majid Ghodsipoor, D. Farsi, Mahdi Rezai, P. Hafezimoghadam, Mani Mofidi, Mobina Yarahmadi, Nazanin Alaei Faradonbeh
{"title":"转诊至急诊科的患者在骨科手术过程中不同酮洛酚程序镇静和镇痛剂量的比较:双盲随机临床试验","authors":"Saeed Abbasi, Majid Ghodsipoor, D. Farsi, Mahdi Rezai, P. Hafezimoghadam, Mani Mofidi, Mobina Yarahmadi, Nazanin Alaei Faradonbeh","doi":"10.18502/jost.v10i2.15514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Orthopedic procedures are one of the most common medical procedures in the emergency department (ED) and are also among the most painful procedures performed on the conscious patient. This study aimed to compare different doses of ketofol in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in patients referred to the EDs. \nMethods: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 296 patients aged 18 years or over who presented with the need for orthopedic procedures in the three academic EDs in 2020 were studied. After completing the written consent, the patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups. Demographic information, underlying diseases, patients' physical condition, type of orthopedic injuries requiring intervention, and patients' vital signs were recorded in a checklist for each patient. \nResults: In this study, the mean age, gender, level of education, addiction, patients' physical condition, type of procedures performed, apnea, hypoventilation, bradycardia, hypotension, and agitation in all four treatment groups were not statistically different, but hallucination and hypoxia in group C (propofol 1 mg/kg plus ketamine 0.33 mg/kg) were much less than other groups; thus, oxygen administration was more common in other groups. \nConclusion: By testing different doses of ketamine, we concluded that doses of 1 mg and 0.5 mg were associated with more side effects. A dose of 0.33 mg of ketamine has fewer side effects while causing analgesia and sedation as in the above doses. A dose of 0.25 mg of ketamine increases the likelihood of requiring subsequent doses. Therefore, it seems that 0.33 mg of ketamine is the best dose of choice.","PeriodicalId":34870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Ketofol Procedural Sedation and Analgesic Doses during Orthopedic Procedures in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Abbasi, Majid Ghodsipoor, D. Farsi, Mahdi Rezai, P. Hafezimoghadam, Mani Mofidi, Mobina Yarahmadi, Nazanin Alaei Faradonbeh\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jost.v10i2.15514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Orthopedic procedures are one of the most common medical procedures in the emergency department (ED) and are also among the most painful procedures performed on the conscious patient. This study aimed to compare different doses of ketofol in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in patients referred to the EDs. \\nMethods: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 296 patients aged 18 years or over who presented with the need for orthopedic procedures in the three academic EDs in 2020 were studied. After completing the written consent, the patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups. Demographic information, underlying diseases, patients' physical condition, type of orthopedic injuries requiring intervention, and patients' vital signs were recorded in a checklist for each patient. \\nResults: In this study, the mean age, gender, level of education, addiction, patients' physical condition, type of procedures performed, apnea, hypoventilation, bradycardia, hypotension, and agitation in all four treatment groups were not statistically different, but hallucination and hypoxia in group C (propofol 1 mg/kg plus ketamine 0.33 mg/kg) were much less than other groups; thus, oxygen administration was more common in other groups. \\nConclusion: By testing different doses of ketamine, we concluded that doses of 1 mg and 0.5 mg were associated with more side effects. A dose of 0.33 mg of ketamine has fewer side effects while causing analgesia and sedation as in the above doses. A dose of 0.25 mg of ketamine increases the likelihood of requiring subsequent doses. Therefore, it seems that 0.33 mg of ketamine is the best dose of choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v10i2.15514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v10i2.15514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科手术是急诊科(ED)最常见的医疗手术之一,也是对意识清醒的患者实施的最痛苦的手术之一。本研究旨在比较不同剂量的酮洛酚对急诊科转诊患者的手术镇静和镇痛(PSA)效果。方法:在这项双盲临床试验中,研究对象是 2020 年在三所学术性急诊室就诊的 296 名 18 岁或以上需要进行骨科手术的患者。在填写书面同意书后,患者被随机分配到四个治疗组。每位患者的人口统计学信息、基础疾病、患者身体状况、需要干预的骨科损伤类型以及患者的生命体征均记录在检查表中。研究结果本研究中,四个治疗组的平均年龄、性别、受教育程度、毒瘾、患者身体状况、手术类型、呼吸暂停、通气不足、心动过缓、低血压和躁动均无统计学差异,但 C 组(异丙酚 1 毫克/千克加氯胺酮 0.33 毫克/千克)的幻觉和缺氧远少于其他组;因此,其他组的吸氧情况更为普遍。结论通过测试不同剂量的氯胺酮,我们得出结论:1 毫克和 0.5 毫克的剂量会产生更多副作用。0.33 毫克氯胺酮的副作用较小,但可产生上述剂量的镇痛和镇静效果。氯胺酮剂量为 0.25 毫克会增加需要后续剂量的可能性。因此,0.33 毫克氯胺酮似乎是最佳选择剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Ketofol Procedural Sedation and Analgesic Doses during Orthopedic Procedures in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Orthopedic procedures are one of the most common medical procedures in the emergency department (ED) and are also among the most painful procedures performed on the conscious patient. This study aimed to compare different doses of ketofol in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in patients referred to the EDs. Methods: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 296 patients aged 18 years or over who presented with the need for orthopedic procedures in the three academic EDs in 2020 were studied. After completing the written consent, the patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups. Demographic information, underlying diseases, patients' physical condition, type of orthopedic injuries requiring intervention, and patients' vital signs were recorded in a checklist for each patient. Results: In this study, the mean age, gender, level of education, addiction, patients' physical condition, type of procedures performed, apnea, hypoventilation, bradycardia, hypotension, and agitation in all four treatment groups were not statistically different, but hallucination and hypoxia in group C (propofol 1 mg/kg plus ketamine 0.33 mg/kg) were much less than other groups; thus, oxygen administration was more common in other groups. Conclusion: By testing different doses of ketamine, we concluded that doses of 1 mg and 0.5 mg were associated with more side effects. A dose of 0.33 mg of ketamine has fewer side effects while causing analgesia and sedation as in the above doses. A dose of 0.25 mg of ketamine increases the likelihood of requiring subsequent doses. Therefore, it seems that 0.33 mg of ketamine is the best dose of choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信