氢桥教学:不再是 FON!

Guy V. Lamoureux, Katherine Chaves-Carballo
{"title":"氢桥教学:不再是 FON!","authors":"Guy V. Lamoureux, Katherine Chaves-Carballo","doi":"10.1515/cti-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Teaching hydrogen bridges (H-bridges) in introductory chemistry courses is either oversimplified or dogmatically taught; the heuristic that ‘only fluorine, oxygen and nitrogen (FON) form H-bridges’ is commonly used, for example. This rule limits choices, does not match reality, and does not clarify the difference between H-bridge donors (HBD) and H-bridge acceptors (HBA) nor intermolecular versus intramolecular cases. Hydrogen fluoride is a significant HBD but a poor HBA. Oxygen is not always an HBD or HBA. Ammonia is a significant HBA but a poor HBD. There are many examples of H-bridges that do not contain these three elements. All examples of H-bridges should be shown in a way to provide symbolic and molecular structures. Is it necessary to ‘explain’ H-bridges in introductory classes? We conclude not, but it might be necessary to increase the total amount of time to present the material so that students do not rely on superficial rules.","PeriodicalId":515025,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Teacher International","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching hydrogen bridges: it is not FON anymore!\",\"authors\":\"Guy V. Lamoureux, Katherine Chaves-Carballo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cti-2023-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Teaching hydrogen bridges (H-bridges) in introductory chemistry courses is either oversimplified or dogmatically taught; the heuristic that ‘only fluorine, oxygen and nitrogen (FON) form H-bridges’ is commonly used, for example. This rule limits choices, does not match reality, and does not clarify the difference between H-bridge donors (HBD) and H-bridge acceptors (HBA) nor intermolecular versus intramolecular cases. Hydrogen fluoride is a significant HBD but a poor HBA. Oxygen is not always an HBD or HBA. Ammonia is a significant HBA but a poor HBD. There are many examples of H-bridges that do not contain these three elements. All examples of H-bridges should be shown in a way to provide symbolic and molecular structures. Is it necessary to ‘explain’ H-bridges in introductory classes? We conclude not, but it might be necessary to increase the total amount of time to present the material so that students do not rely on superficial rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Teacher International\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Teacher International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2023-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Teacher International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在化学入门课程中讲授氢桥(H-bridges)时,要么过于简单化,要么教条化;例如,"只有氟、氧和氮(FON)才能形成 H-bridges "的启发式教学就很常用。这一规则限制了人们的选择,不符合实际情况,也没有阐明 H 桥供体(HBD)和 H 桥受体(HBA)之间的区别,以及分子间和分子内的情况。氟化氢是一种重要的 HBD,但却是一种差的 HBA。氧气并不总是 HBD 或 HBA。氨是一种重要的 HBA,但 HBD 含量较低。有很多 H 桥的例子都不包含这三种元素。所有 H-桥的例子都应以提供符号和分子结构的方式显示出来。是否有必要在入门课程中 "解释 "H 桥?我们的结论是没有必要,但可能有必要增加介绍材料的总时间,以便学生不依赖于肤浅的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching hydrogen bridges: it is not FON anymore!
Teaching hydrogen bridges (H-bridges) in introductory chemistry courses is either oversimplified or dogmatically taught; the heuristic that ‘only fluorine, oxygen and nitrogen (FON) form H-bridges’ is commonly used, for example. This rule limits choices, does not match reality, and does not clarify the difference between H-bridge donors (HBD) and H-bridge acceptors (HBA) nor intermolecular versus intramolecular cases. Hydrogen fluoride is a significant HBD but a poor HBA. Oxygen is not always an HBD or HBA. Ammonia is a significant HBA but a poor HBD. There are many examples of H-bridges that do not contain these three elements. All examples of H-bridges should be shown in a way to provide symbolic and molecular structures. Is it necessary to ‘explain’ H-bridges in introductory classes? We conclude not, but it might be necessary to increase the total amount of time to present the material so that students do not rely on superficial rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信