M. Arensberg, Jaime Gahche, Raquel Clapés Pemau, Kirk W. Kerr, Johanna T. Dwyer
{"title":"生活质量工具和营养筛查工具","authors":"M. Arensberg, Jaime Gahche, Raquel Clapés Pemau, Kirk W. Kerr, Johanna T. Dwyer","doi":"10.1097/nt.0000000000000687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Quality of life (QoL) is critical for healthy aging—both for older adults and for healthcare providers/health systems. Eating and nutritious food are essential for older adults to remain healthy/independent and maintain good nutrition status and also provide pleasure and enhance QoL. However, research on nutrition and QoL is limited, including for building understanding of the relationship between nutrition and QoL and of the instruments and tools used to help develop a research framework and evaluate the impact of United States community nutrition programs/services on QoL.\n \n \n \n The first objective is to review overlaps/gaps in previously identified/validated QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools used in research with community-living older adults and then, second, to use these findings to suggest opportunities for further research and implications for developing US health and nutrition policies/programs supporting healthy aging.\n \n \n \n Twenty validated QoL instruments were reviewed to determine if they included nutrition-related items that corresponded to 8 QoL domains (physical health, emotional state, mental health, social connection, environment, personhood, autonomy, and spiritual feeling). Sixteen validated nutrition screening tools were reviewed to determine if any of their nutrition items corresponded with these same 8 QoL domains.\n \n \n \n Of the 20 QoL instruments reviewed, 75% included at least 1 nutrition-related item, most commonly fitting into the autonomy (n = 11), physical health (n = 7), social connection (n = 3), environment (n = 3), emotional state (n = 2), mental health (n = 2), and personhood (n = 1) domains, with none in the spiritual feeling domain. All 16 nutrition screening tools included at least 1 nutrition-related item corresponding to a QoL domain, most commonly the physical health (n = 16) domain. Other QoL domains represented by nutrition items in nutrition screening tools were autonomy (n = 9), emotional state (n = 5), social connection (n = 5), environment (n = 4), and mental health (n = 3). Commonalities existed between QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools in types of nutrition-related items included, but there were many inconsistencies/gaps.\n \n \n \n Nutrition items corresponding to different QoL domains are found inconsistently among validated QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools. Nutrition can be potentially modified to benefit healthy aging and QoL outcomes; findings present opportunities for further research to help increase understanding of the relationship between QoL and nutrition and the effectiveness of nutrition interventions, as well as to help advance US policy development and programs supporting healthy aging.\n","PeriodicalId":19386,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Today","volume":"57 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality-of-Life Instruments and Nutrition Screening Tools\",\"authors\":\"M. Arensberg, Jaime Gahche, Raquel Clapés Pemau, Kirk W. Kerr, Johanna T. Dwyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/nt.0000000000000687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Quality of life (QoL) is critical for healthy aging—both for older adults and for healthcare providers/health systems. Eating and nutritious food are essential for older adults to remain healthy/independent and maintain good nutrition status and also provide pleasure and enhance QoL. However, research on nutrition and QoL is limited, including for building understanding of the relationship between nutrition and QoL and of the instruments and tools used to help develop a research framework and evaluate the impact of United States community nutrition programs/services on QoL.\\n \\n \\n \\n The first objective is to review overlaps/gaps in previously identified/validated QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools used in research with community-living older adults and then, second, to use these findings to suggest opportunities for further research and implications for developing US health and nutrition policies/programs supporting healthy aging.\\n \\n \\n \\n Twenty validated QoL instruments were reviewed to determine if they included nutrition-related items that corresponded to 8 QoL domains (physical health, emotional state, mental health, social connection, environment, personhood, autonomy, and spiritual feeling). Sixteen validated nutrition screening tools were reviewed to determine if any of their nutrition items corresponded with these same 8 QoL domains.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the 20 QoL instruments reviewed, 75% included at least 1 nutrition-related item, most commonly fitting into the autonomy (n = 11), physical health (n = 7), social connection (n = 3), environment (n = 3), emotional state (n = 2), mental health (n = 2), and personhood (n = 1) domains, with none in the spiritual feeling domain. All 16 nutrition screening tools included at least 1 nutrition-related item corresponding to a QoL domain, most commonly the physical health (n = 16) domain. Other QoL domains represented by nutrition items in nutrition screening tools were autonomy (n = 9), emotional state (n = 5), social connection (n = 5), environment (n = 4), and mental health (n = 3). Commonalities existed between QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools in types of nutrition-related items included, but there were many inconsistencies/gaps.\\n \\n \\n \\n Nutrition items corresponding to different QoL domains are found inconsistently among validated QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools. Nutrition can be potentially modified to benefit healthy aging and QoL outcomes; findings present opportunities for further research to help increase understanding of the relationship between QoL and nutrition and the effectiveness of nutrition interventions, as well as to help advance US policy development and programs supporting healthy aging.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Today\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/nt.0000000000000687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nt.0000000000000687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生活质量(QoL)对健康的老龄化至关重要--无论是对老年人还是对医疗服务提供者/医疗系统都是如此。饮食和营养食品对于老年人保持健康/独立、维持良好的营养状况以及提供乐趣和提高生活质量至关重要。然而,有关营养和 QoL 的研究还很有限,包括对营养和 QoL 之间关系的了解,以及对用于帮助制定研究框架和评估美国社区营养计划/服务对 QoL 影响的工具和手段的了解。 研究的第一个目的是回顾先前确定/验证的 QoL 工具和用于社区生活老年人研究的营养筛查工具之间的重叠/差距,其次是利用这些发现提出进一步研究的机会以及对制定支持健康老龄化的美国健康和营养政策/计划的影响。 研究人员对 20 种经过验证的 QoL 工具进行了审查,以确定这些工具是否包含与 8 个 QoL 领域(身体健康、情绪状态、心理健康、社会联系、环境、人格、自主性和精神感受)相对应的营养相关项目。对 16 种有效的营养筛查工具进行了审查,以确定其营养项目是否与这 8 个 QoL 领域相对应。 在所审查的 20 种 QoL 工具中,75% 的工具包含至少 1 个与营养相关的项目,其中最常见的是自主性(n = 11)、身体健康(n = 7)、社会联系(n = 3)、环境(n = 3)、情绪状态(n = 2)、心理健康(n = 2)和人格(n = 1)领域,而精神感受领域中没有任何项目。所有 16 种营养筛查工具都包含至少一项与 QoL 领域相对应的营养相关项目,其中最常见的是身体健康(16 项)领域。营养筛查工具中的营养项目所代表的其他 QoL 领域包括自主性(9 个)、情绪状态(5 个)、社会联系(5 个)、环境(4 个)和心理健康(3 个)。在营养相关项目的类型上,QoL 工具和营养筛查工具之间存在共性,但也存在许多不一致/差距。 在经过验证的 QoL 工具和营养筛查工具中,与不同 QoL 领域相对应的营养项目并不一致。对营养进行调整可能有利于健康老龄化和 QoL 结果;研究结果为进一步研究提供了机会,有助于加深对 QoL 与营养之间的关系以及营养干预措施的有效性的理解,并有助于推动美国支持健康老龄化的政策制定和计划。
Quality-of-Life Instruments and Nutrition Screening Tools
Quality of life (QoL) is critical for healthy aging—both for older adults and for healthcare providers/health systems. Eating and nutritious food are essential for older adults to remain healthy/independent and maintain good nutrition status and also provide pleasure and enhance QoL. However, research on nutrition and QoL is limited, including for building understanding of the relationship between nutrition and QoL and of the instruments and tools used to help develop a research framework and evaluate the impact of United States community nutrition programs/services on QoL.
The first objective is to review overlaps/gaps in previously identified/validated QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools used in research with community-living older adults and then, second, to use these findings to suggest opportunities for further research and implications for developing US health and nutrition policies/programs supporting healthy aging.
Twenty validated QoL instruments were reviewed to determine if they included nutrition-related items that corresponded to 8 QoL domains (physical health, emotional state, mental health, social connection, environment, personhood, autonomy, and spiritual feeling). Sixteen validated nutrition screening tools were reviewed to determine if any of their nutrition items corresponded with these same 8 QoL domains.
Of the 20 QoL instruments reviewed, 75% included at least 1 nutrition-related item, most commonly fitting into the autonomy (n = 11), physical health (n = 7), social connection (n = 3), environment (n = 3), emotional state (n = 2), mental health (n = 2), and personhood (n = 1) domains, with none in the spiritual feeling domain. All 16 nutrition screening tools included at least 1 nutrition-related item corresponding to a QoL domain, most commonly the physical health (n = 16) domain. Other QoL domains represented by nutrition items in nutrition screening tools were autonomy (n = 9), emotional state (n = 5), social connection (n = 5), environment (n = 4), and mental health (n = 3). Commonalities existed between QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools in types of nutrition-related items included, but there were many inconsistencies/gaps.
Nutrition items corresponding to different QoL domains are found inconsistently among validated QoL instruments and nutrition screening tools. Nutrition can be potentially modified to benefit healthy aging and QoL outcomes; findings present opportunities for further research to help increase understanding of the relationship between QoL and nutrition and the effectiveness of nutrition interventions, as well as to help advance US policy development and programs supporting healthy aging.
期刊介绍:
An established journal for over 40 years, Nutrition Today publishes articles by leading nutritionists and scientists who endorse scientifically sound food, diet and nutritional practices. It helps nutrition professionals clear a pathway through today"s maze of fad diets and cure-all claims. Lively review articles cover the most current and controversial topics, such as the role of dietary fiber in cancer, as well as news about people, meetings, and other events that affect the field. The journal features solicited and submitted original articles, reviews of nutrition research findings, and summaries of symposia.