左心室层应变和特定区域应变模式在心脏淀粉样变性病和法布里病中的诊断价值

Tilman Steudel, Gina Barzen, D. Frumkin, Elena Romero-Dorta, Sebastian Spethmann, Gerhard Hindricks, Karl Stangl, Fabian Knebel, Bettina Heidecker, Sima Canaan-Kühl, Helena Franziska Pernice, K. Hahn, I. Mattig, Anna Brand
{"title":"左心室层应变和特定区域应变模式在心脏淀粉样变性病和法布里病中的诊断价值","authors":"Tilman Steudel, Gina Barzen, D. Frumkin, Elena Romero-Dorta, Sebastian Spethmann, Gerhard Hindricks, Karl Stangl, Fabian Knebel, Bettina Heidecker, Sima Canaan-Kühl, Helena Franziska Pernice, K. Hahn, I. Mattig, Anna Brand","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Layer-specific left ventricular (LV) strain alterations have been suggested as a specific finding in Fabry Disease (FD). Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of layer specific radial strain (RS) indices compared to the established LV regional strain pattern in Cardiac Amyloidosis (CA) and FD, i.e. apical sparing, and posterolateral strain deficiency.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively analyzed the global, subendocardial, subepicardial LV radial strain, the corresponding strain gradient, as well as the regional and global longitudinal strain. The diagnostic accuracy of the diverse LV strain analyses was comparatively assessed using receiver operating curve (ROC) and multivariable regression analyses. In 40 FD and 76 CA patients, CA featured more reduced layer strain values [Global RS -12.3 (-15.6 to -9.6) in CA vs. -16.7 (-20.0 to-13.6) in FD; p < 0.001; subendocardial RS -22.3 (-27.4 to -15.9) vs. -28.3 (-31.8 to -23.6), p < 0.001; subepicardial RS -6.6 (-8.6 to -4.7) in CA vs. -8.9 (-11.7 to- 6.5 in FD; p < 0.001]. Global radial and longitudinal strain held an AUC of 0.75 (0.66 to 0.84) and AUC 0.73 (0.63 to 0.83). While the apical sparing and PLSD strain pattern showed the highest accuracy as single parameters [AUC 0.87 (0.79 to 0.95) and 0.81 (0.72 to 0.89), p < 0.001], the combination of subendocardial RS and the apical sparing pattern featured the highest diagnostic accuracy [AUC 0.92 (0.87 to 0.97)].\n \n \n \n Combining radial strain derived parameters to the established strain pattern apical sparing and PLSD improve the diagnostic accuracy in the echocardiographic assessment in suspected storage disease.\n","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of left ventricular layer strain and specific regional strain patterns in cardiac amyloidosis and Fabry disease\",\"authors\":\"Tilman Steudel, Gina Barzen, D. Frumkin, Elena Romero-Dorta, Sebastian Spethmann, Gerhard Hindricks, Karl Stangl, Fabian Knebel, Bettina Heidecker, Sima Canaan-Kühl, Helena Franziska Pernice, K. Hahn, I. Mattig, Anna Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Layer-specific left ventricular (LV) strain alterations have been suggested as a specific finding in Fabry Disease (FD). Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of layer specific radial strain (RS) indices compared to the established LV regional strain pattern in Cardiac Amyloidosis (CA) and FD, i.e. apical sparing, and posterolateral strain deficiency.\\n \\n \\n \\n We retrospectively analyzed the global, subendocardial, subepicardial LV radial strain, the corresponding strain gradient, as well as the regional and global longitudinal strain. The diagnostic accuracy of the diverse LV strain analyses was comparatively assessed using receiver operating curve (ROC) and multivariable regression analyses. In 40 FD and 76 CA patients, CA featured more reduced layer strain values [Global RS -12.3 (-15.6 to -9.6) in CA vs. -16.7 (-20.0 to-13.6) in FD; p < 0.001; subendocardial RS -22.3 (-27.4 to -15.9) vs. -28.3 (-31.8 to -23.6), p < 0.001; subepicardial RS -6.6 (-8.6 to -4.7) in CA vs. -8.9 (-11.7 to- 6.5 in FD; p < 0.001]. Global radial and longitudinal strain held an AUC of 0.75 (0.66 to 0.84) and AUC 0.73 (0.63 to 0.83). While the apical sparing and PLSD strain pattern showed the highest accuracy as single parameters [AUC 0.87 (0.79 to 0.95) and 0.81 (0.72 to 0.89), p < 0.001], the combination of subendocardial RS and the apical sparing pattern featured the highest diagnostic accuracy [AUC 0.92 (0.87 to 0.97)].\\n \\n \\n \\n Combining radial strain derived parameters to the established strain pattern apical sparing and PLSD improve the diagnostic accuracy in the echocardiographic assessment in suspected storage disease.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法布里病(Fabry Disease,FD)的特异性左心室(LV)应变改变被认为是一种特异性发现。我们的研究旨在评估各层特异性径向应变(RS)指数与心脏淀粉样变性(CA)和法布里病已确立的左心室区域应变模式(即心尖稀疏和后外侧应变缺乏)相比的诊断价值。 我们回顾性分析了整体、心内膜下、心外膜下左心室径向应变、相应的应变梯度以及区域和整体纵向应变。利用接收器操作曲线(ROC)和多变量回归分析比较评估了各种左心室应变分析的诊断准确性。在40例FD和76例CA患者中,CA患者的层应变值更低[CA患者的全层RS为-12.3(-15.6至-9.6),而FD患者为-16.7(-20.0至-13.6);P < 0.001; 心内膜下 RS -22.3 (-27.4 to -15.9) vs. -28.3 (-31.8 to -23.6), p < 0.001; 心外膜下 RS -6.6 (-8.6 to -4.7) in CA vs. -8.9 (-11.7 to -6.5 in FD; p < 0.001]。全球径向和纵向应变的 AUC 分别为 0.75(0.66 至 0.84)和 0.73(0.63 至 0.83)。心尖疏松和 PLSD 应变模式作为单一参数显示出最高的准确性[AUC 0.87(0.79 至 0.95)和 0.81(0.72 至 0.89),p < 0.001],而心内膜下 RS 和心尖疏松模式的组合则显示出最高的诊断准确性[AUC 0.92(0.87 至 0.97)]。 将径向应变衍生参数与已建立的应变模式心尖疏松和 PLSD 相结合,可提高疑似储层疾病超声心动图评估的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of left ventricular layer strain and specific regional strain patterns in cardiac amyloidosis and Fabry disease
Layer-specific left ventricular (LV) strain alterations have been suggested as a specific finding in Fabry Disease (FD). Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of layer specific radial strain (RS) indices compared to the established LV regional strain pattern in Cardiac Amyloidosis (CA) and FD, i.e. apical sparing, and posterolateral strain deficiency. We retrospectively analyzed the global, subendocardial, subepicardial LV radial strain, the corresponding strain gradient, as well as the regional and global longitudinal strain. The diagnostic accuracy of the diverse LV strain analyses was comparatively assessed using receiver operating curve (ROC) and multivariable regression analyses. In 40 FD and 76 CA patients, CA featured more reduced layer strain values [Global RS -12.3 (-15.6 to -9.6) in CA vs. -16.7 (-20.0 to-13.6) in FD; p < 0.001; subendocardial RS -22.3 (-27.4 to -15.9) vs. -28.3 (-31.8 to -23.6), p < 0.001; subepicardial RS -6.6 (-8.6 to -4.7) in CA vs. -8.9 (-11.7 to- 6.5 in FD; p < 0.001]. Global radial and longitudinal strain held an AUC of 0.75 (0.66 to 0.84) and AUC 0.73 (0.63 to 0.83). While the apical sparing and PLSD strain pattern showed the highest accuracy as single parameters [AUC 0.87 (0.79 to 0.95) and 0.81 (0.72 to 0.89), p < 0.001], the combination of subendocardial RS and the apical sparing pattern featured the highest diagnostic accuracy [AUC 0.92 (0.87 to 0.97)]. Combining radial strain derived parameters to the established strain pattern apical sparing and PLSD improve the diagnostic accuracy in the echocardiographic assessment in suspected storage disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信