英语-西班牙语双语音韵学的变异性

Katerina Tetzloff
{"title":"英语-西班牙语双语音韵学的变异性","authors":"Katerina Tetzloff","doi":"10.1558/jmbs.24641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spanish prohibits initial sC clusters. Past studies have reported that this phonotactic restriction results in the perception of an illusory /e/, ‘repairing’ the illicit sequence (e.g., spid perceived as espid). Because English allows sC clusters, English-Spanish bilinguals are confronted with conflicting phonotactic systems. The present study investigated if this locus of phonotactic conflict yields bilingual variability (i.e., non-monolingual-like language behavior). Spanish monolinguals and English-Spanish bilinguals performed a nonce word judgment task, whereby they assigned acceptability ratings to sC-initial nonce words. Monolinguals were highly unaccepting of sC-initial words, whereas bilinguals were more likely to accept them as phonotactically licit, showing evidence of bilingual variability. The bilingual variability was constrained by English phonotactics, as sC clusters were rated as significantly more acceptable than other illicit onset clusters that are illicit in both languages. Furthermore, the monolinguals failed to show evidence of an illusory vowel effect, highlighting the importance of task type in phonotactic perception studies.","PeriodicalId":73840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in English-Spanish bilingual phonotactics\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Tetzloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/jmbs.24641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spanish prohibits initial sC clusters. Past studies have reported that this phonotactic restriction results in the perception of an illusory /e/, ‘repairing’ the illicit sequence (e.g., spid perceived as espid). Because English allows sC clusters, English-Spanish bilinguals are confronted with conflicting phonotactic systems. The present study investigated if this locus of phonotactic conflict yields bilingual variability (i.e., non-monolingual-like language behavior). Spanish monolinguals and English-Spanish bilinguals performed a nonce word judgment task, whereby they assigned acceptability ratings to sC-initial nonce words. Monolinguals were highly unaccepting of sC-initial words, whereas bilinguals were more likely to accept them as phonotactically licit, showing evidence of bilingual variability. The bilingual variability was constrained by English phonotactics, as sC clusters were rated as significantly more acceptable than other illicit onset clusters that are illicit in both languages. Furthermore, the monolinguals failed to show evidence of an illusory vowel effect, highlighting the importance of task type in phonotactic perception studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.24641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.24641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西班牙语禁止初始 sC 音簇。过去的研究表明,这种语音战术限制会导致对虚假 /e/ 的感知,从而 "修复 "非法序列(例如,将 spid 感知为 espid)。由于英语允许使用 sC 音簇,因此英语-西班牙语双语者面临着相互冲突的语音战术系统。本研究调查了这种语音战术冲突是否会产生二语变异(即非单语的语言行为)。西班牙语单语者和英语-西班牙语双语者进行了一项非ce词判断任务,对以sC开头的非ce词进行可接受性评分。单语者非常不接受以 sC 开头的单词,而双语者则更有可能接受这些单词,认为它们在语音学上是合法的,这显示了双语变异性的证据。这种双语变异性受到英语语音actics 的限制,因为 sC 音簇的可接受性明显高于其他在两种语言中都是非法的非法起始音簇。此外,单语者未能显示出虚幻元音效应的证据,这突出了任务类型在语音战术感知研究中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability in English-Spanish bilingual phonotactics
Spanish prohibits initial sC clusters. Past studies have reported that this phonotactic restriction results in the perception of an illusory /e/, ‘repairing’ the illicit sequence (e.g., spid perceived as espid). Because English allows sC clusters, English-Spanish bilinguals are confronted with conflicting phonotactic systems. The present study investigated if this locus of phonotactic conflict yields bilingual variability (i.e., non-monolingual-like language behavior). Spanish monolinguals and English-Spanish bilinguals performed a nonce word judgment task, whereby they assigned acceptability ratings to sC-initial nonce words. Monolinguals were highly unaccepting of sC-initial words, whereas bilinguals were more likely to accept them as phonotactically licit, showing evidence of bilingual variability. The bilingual variability was constrained by English phonotactics, as sC clusters were rated as significantly more acceptable than other illicit onset clusters that are illicit in both languages. Furthermore, the monolinguals failed to show evidence of an illusory vowel effect, highlighting the importance of task type in phonotactic perception studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信