大肠息肉静态图像中的光学诊断:内窥镜专家与计算机辅助诊断系统 PolyDeep 的比较

Pedro Davila-Piñón, Alba Nogueira-Rodríguez, Astrid Irene Díez-Martín, L. Codesido, Jesús Herrero, Manuel Puga, Laura Rivas, Eloy Sánchez, F. Fdez-Riverola, D. Glez-Peña, M. Reboiro-Jato, H. López-Fernández, Joaquín Cubiella
{"title":"大肠息肉静态图像中的光学诊断:内窥镜专家与计算机辅助诊断系统 PolyDeep 的比较","authors":"Pedro Davila-Piñón, Alba Nogueira-Rodríguez, Astrid Irene Díez-Martín, L. Codesido, Jesús Herrero, Manuel Puga, Laura Rivas, Eloy Sánchez, F. Fdez-Riverola, D. Glez-Peña, M. Reboiro-Jato, H. López-Fernández, Joaquín Cubiella","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1393815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and classification (CADe/x) system trained to detect and classify polyps. During colonoscopy, CADe/x systems help endoscopists to predict the histology of colonic lesions.To compare the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and expert endoscopists for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps on still images.PolyDeep Image Classification (PIC) is an in vitro diagnostic test study. The PIC database contains NBI images of 491 colorectal polyps with histological diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and four expert endoscopists for neoplasia (adenoma, sessile serrated lesion, traditional serrated adenoma) and adenoma characterization and compared them with the McNemar test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the overall discriminatory ability, comparing the area under the curve of endoscopists and PolyDeep with the chi- square homogeneity areas test.The diagnostic performance of the endoscopists and PolyDeep in the characterization of neoplasia is similar in terms of sensitivity (PolyDeep: 89.05%; E1: 91.23%, p=0.5; E2: 96.11%, p<0.001; E3: 86.65%, p=0.3; E4: 91.26% p=0.3) and specificity (PolyDeep: 35.53%; E1: 33.80%, p=0.8; E2: 34.72%, p=1; E3: 39.24%, p=0.8; E4: 46.84%, p=0.2). The overall discriminative ability also showed no statistically significant differences (PolyDeep: 0.623; E1: 0.625, p=0.8; E2: 0.654, p=0.2; E3: 0.629, p=0.9; E4: 0.690, p=0.09). In the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps, we found that PolyDeep had a significantly higher sensitivity and a significantly lower specificity. The overall discriminative ability of adenomatous lesions by expert endoscopists is significantly higher than PolyDeep (PolyDeep: 0.582; E1: 0.685, p < 0.001; E2: 0.677, p < 0.0001; E3: 0.658, p < 0.01; E4: 0.694, p < 0.0001).PolyDeep and endoscopists have similar diagnostic performance in the optical diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. However, endoscopists have a better global discriminatory ability than PolyDeep in the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps.","PeriodicalId":507440,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"120 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical diagnosis in still images of colorectal polyps: comparison between expert endoscopists and PolyDeep, a Computer-Aided Diagnosis system\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Davila-Piñón, Alba Nogueira-Rodríguez, Astrid Irene Díez-Martín, L. Codesido, Jesús Herrero, Manuel Puga, Laura Rivas, Eloy Sánchez, F. Fdez-Riverola, D. Glez-Peña, M. Reboiro-Jato, H. López-Fernández, Joaquín Cubiella\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fonc.2024.1393815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and classification (CADe/x) system trained to detect and classify polyps. During colonoscopy, CADe/x systems help endoscopists to predict the histology of colonic lesions.To compare the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and expert endoscopists for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps on still images.PolyDeep Image Classification (PIC) is an in vitro diagnostic test study. The PIC database contains NBI images of 491 colorectal polyps with histological diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and four expert endoscopists for neoplasia (adenoma, sessile serrated lesion, traditional serrated adenoma) and adenoma characterization and compared them with the McNemar test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the overall discriminatory ability, comparing the area under the curve of endoscopists and PolyDeep with the chi- square homogeneity areas test.The diagnostic performance of the endoscopists and PolyDeep in the characterization of neoplasia is similar in terms of sensitivity (PolyDeep: 89.05%; E1: 91.23%, p=0.5; E2: 96.11%, p<0.001; E3: 86.65%, p=0.3; E4: 91.26% p=0.3) and specificity (PolyDeep: 35.53%; E1: 33.80%, p=0.8; E2: 34.72%, p=1; E3: 39.24%, p=0.8; E4: 46.84%, p=0.2). The overall discriminative ability also showed no statistically significant differences (PolyDeep: 0.623; E1: 0.625, p=0.8; E2: 0.654, p=0.2; E3: 0.629, p=0.9; E4: 0.690, p=0.09). In the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps, we found that PolyDeep had a significantly higher sensitivity and a significantly lower specificity. The overall discriminative ability of adenomatous lesions by expert endoscopists is significantly higher than PolyDeep (PolyDeep: 0.582; E1: 0.685, p < 0.001; E2: 0.677, p < 0.0001; E3: 0.658, p < 0.01; E4: 0.694, p < 0.0001).PolyDeep and endoscopists have similar diagnostic performance in the optical diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. However, endoscopists have a better global discriminatory ability than PolyDeep in the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"120 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1393815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1393815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PolyDeep 是一种计算机辅助检测和分类(CADe/x)系统,经过训练可对息肉进行检测和分类。PolyDeep 图像分类(PIC)是一项体外诊断测试研究,目的是比较 PolyDeep 和内镜专家在静态图像上对大肠息肉进行光学诊断时的诊断性能。PolyDeep 图像分类(PIC)是一项体外诊断测试研究。PIC 数据库包含 491 个经组织学诊断的结直肠息肉的 NBI 图像。我们评估了 PolyDeep 和四位内镜专家对肿瘤(腺瘤、无柄锯齿状病变、传统锯齿状腺瘤)和腺瘤特征的诊断性能,并用 McNemar 检验对它们进行了比较。通过构建接收者操作特征曲线来评估总体鉴别能力,并用秩方同质性区域检验比较内镜医师和PolyDeep的曲线下面积。就灵敏度(PolyDeep:89.05%;E1:91.23%,p=0.5;E2:96.11%,p<0.001;E3:86.65%,p=0.3;E4:91.26%,p=0.3)和特异性(PolyDeep:35.53%;E1:33.80%,p=0.8;E2:34.72%,p=1;E3:39.24%,p=0.3)而言,内镜医师和 PolyDeep 对肿瘤特征的诊断表现相似:39.24%,p=0.8;E4:46.84%,p=0.2)。总体分辨能力也没有显著的统计学差异(PolyDeep:0.623;E1:0.625,p=0.8;E2:0.654,p=0.2;E3:0.629,p=0.2):0.629,p=0.9;E4:0.690,p=0.09)。在腺瘤性息肉的光学诊断中,我们发现 PolyDeep 的灵敏度明显较高,而特异性则明显较低。内镜专家对腺瘤病变的总体鉴别能力明显高于 PolyDeep(PolyDeep:0.582;E1:0.685,p <0.001;E2:0.677,p <0.0001;E3:在肿瘤病变的光学诊断方面,PolyDeep 和内镜医师具有相似的诊断性能。在腺瘤性息肉的光学诊断中,PolyDeep 和内镜医师的诊断性能相似,但在腺瘤性息肉的光学诊断中,内镜医师的整体鉴别能力优于 PolyDeep。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optical diagnosis in still images of colorectal polyps: comparison between expert endoscopists and PolyDeep, a Computer-Aided Diagnosis system
PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and classification (CADe/x) system trained to detect and classify polyps. During colonoscopy, CADe/x systems help endoscopists to predict the histology of colonic lesions.To compare the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and expert endoscopists for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps on still images.PolyDeep Image Classification (PIC) is an in vitro diagnostic test study. The PIC database contains NBI images of 491 colorectal polyps with histological diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and four expert endoscopists for neoplasia (adenoma, sessile serrated lesion, traditional serrated adenoma) and adenoma characterization and compared them with the McNemar test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the overall discriminatory ability, comparing the area under the curve of endoscopists and PolyDeep with the chi- square homogeneity areas test.The diagnostic performance of the endoscopists and PolyDeep in the characterization of neoplasia is similar in terms of sensitivity (PolyDeep: 89.05%; E1: 91.23%, p=0.5; E2: 96.11%, p<0.001; E3: 86.65%, p=0.3; E4: 91.26% p=0.3) and specificity (PolyDeep: 35.53%; E1: 33.80%, p=0.8; E2: 34.72%, p=1; E3: 39.24%, p=0.8; E4: 46.84%, p=0.2). The overall discriminative ability also showed no statistically significant differences (PolyDeep: 0.623; E1: 0.625, p=0.8; E2: 0.654, p=0.2; E3: 0.629, p=0.9; E4: 0.690, p=0.09). In the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps, we found that PolyDeep had a significantly higher sensitivity and a significantly lower specificity. The overall discriminative ability of adenomatous lesions by expert endoscopists is significantly higher than PolyDeep (PolyDeep: 0.582; E1: 0.685, p < 0.001; E2: 0.677, p < 0.0001; E3: 0.658, p < 0.01; E4: 0.694, p < 0.0001).PolyDeep and endoscopists have similar diagnostic performance in the optical diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. However, endoscopists have a better global discriminatory ability than PolyDeep in the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信