乌干达坎帕拉少女和青年妇女对新型生物医学艾滋病毒暴露前预防方法的偏好:一项混合方法研究

Yunia Mayanja, Ivy Kayesu, Onesmus Kamacooko, Jane Frances Lunkuse, Vincent Muturi-Kioi, Matt Price, Kyriaki Kosidou, Anna Mia Ekström
{"title":"乌干达坎帕拉少女和青年妇女对新型生物医学艾滋病毒暴露前预防方法的偏好:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Yunia Mayanja, Ivy Kayesu, Onesmus Kamacooko, Jane Frances Lunkuse, Vincent Muturi-Kioi, Matt Price, Kyriaki Kosidou, Anna Mia Ekström","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Novel HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) methods including a potential future HIV vaccine, will increase prevention options for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) at high risk of HIV infection in Eastern and Southern Africa, yet data on AGYW’s preferences for various PrEP methods is limited. We investigated preferences for five biomedical PrEP methods (oral, injectable, vaginal ring, implant, HIV vaccine) among 14–24-years-old AGYW in Kampala, Uganda.From January to December 2019, we conducted a mixed methods study including 265 high-risk AGYW. After receiving two education sessions on the five PrEP methods, participants were asked about their “most preferred PrEP method.” Multinomial logistic regression (oral PrEP as reference category) was used to determine participant characteristics associated with method preference. Results are presented as adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 selected participants to examine reasons influencing PrEP preferences and suggestions for method improvements. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.Participants preferred methods were: HIV vaccine (34.7%), oral PrEP (25.7%), injectable PrEP (24.9%), PrEP implant (13.6%), and vaginal ring (1.1%). Preference for injectable PrEP increased with every year of age (aRRR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04–1.44) and among participants with chlamydia or gonorrhoea (aRRR 2.53; 95% CI 1.08–5.90), while it was lower among participants having sexual partner(s) living with HIV or of unknown HIV status (aRRR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10–0.91). Preference for PrEP implants also increased with age (aRRR 1.42; 95% CI 1.14–1.77) and was strong among participants having ≥10 sexual partners in the past 3 months (aRRR 3.14; 95% CI 1.16–8.55), while it was lower among those with sexual partner(s) living with HIV or of unknown HIV status (aRRR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07–0.92). PrEP method preference was influenced by product attributes and prior experiences with similar product forms commonly used in health care.AGYW have varied preferences for biomedical PrEP method and those with higher sexual behavioral risk prefer long-acting methods. As we anticipate more available PrEP options, oral PrEP use should be supported among AGYW, especially for those with sexual partners living with HIV or of unknown HIV status.","PeriodicalId":510753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"15 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference for novel biomedical HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis methods among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda: a mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"Yunia Mayanja, Ivy Kayesu, Onesmus Kamacooko, Jane Frances Lunkuse, Vincent Muturi-Kioi, Matt Price, Kyriaki Kosidou, Anna Mia Ekström\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Novel HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) methods including a potential future HIV vaccine, will increase prevention options for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) at high risk of HIV infection in Eastern and Southern Africa, yet data on AGYW’s preferences for various PrEP methods is limited. We investigated preferences for five biomedical PrEP methods (oral, injectable, vaginal ring, implant, HIV vaccine) among 14–24-years-old AGYW in Kampala, Uganda.From January to December 2019, we conducted a mixed methods study including 265 high-risk AGYW. After receiving two education sessions on the five PrEP methods, participants were asked about their “most preferred PrEP method.” Multinomial logistic regression (oral PrEP as reference category) was used to determine participant characteristics associated with method preference. Results are presented as adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 selected participants to examine reasons influencing PrEP preferences and suggestions for method improvements. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.Participants preferred methods were: HIV vaccine (34.7%), oral PrEP (25.7%), injectable PrEP (24.9%), PrEP implant (13.6%), and vaginal ring (1.1%). Preference for injectable PrEP increased with every year of age (aRRR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04–1.44) and among participants with chlamydia or gonorrhoea (aRRR 2.53; 95% CI 1.08–5.90), while it was lower among participants having sexual partner(s) living with HIV or of unknown HIV status (aRRR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10–0.91). Preference for PrEP implants also increased with age (aRRR 1.42; 95% CI 1.14–1.77) and was strong among participants having ≥10 sexual partners in the past 3 months (aRRR 3.14; 95% CI 1.16–8.55), while it was lower among those with sexual partner(s) living with HIV or of unknown HIV status (aRRR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07–0.92). PrEP method preference was influenced by product attributes and prior experiences with similar product forms commonly used in health care.AGYW have varied preferences for biomedical PrEP method and those with higher sexual behavioral risk prefer long-acting methods. As we anticipate more available PrEP options, oral PrEP use should be supported among AGYW, especially for those with sexual partners living with HIV or of unknown HIV status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"15 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的艾滋病暴露前预防(PrEP)方法,包括未来可能出现的艾滋病疫苗,将增加东部和南部非洲艾滋病感染高风险少女和年轻女性(AGYW)的预防选择,但有关少女和年轻女性对各种 PrEP 方法偏好的数据却很有限。我们调查了乌干达坎帕拉 14-24 岁少女和青年妇女对五种生物医学 PrEP 方法(口服、注射、阴道环、植入、HIV 疫苗)的偏好。2019 年 1 月至 12 月,我们开展了一项混合方法研究,其中包括 265 名高危少女和青年妇女。在接受了两次关于五种 PrEP 方法的教育课程后,参与者被问及他们 "最喜欢的 PrEP 方法"。我们使用多项式逻辑回归(以口服 PrEP 作为参考类别)来确定与方法偏好相关的参与者特征。结果以调整后相对风险比 (aRRR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示。对选定的 20 名参与者进行了深入访谈,以了解影响 PrEP 偏好的原因以及改进方法的建议。对访谈记录进行了专题分析:艾滋病疫苗(34.7%)、口服 PrEP(25.7%)、注射 PrEP(24.9%)、植入式 PrEP(13.6%)和阴道环(1.1%)。年龄越大,对注射式 PrEP 的偏好越高(aRRR 1.22;95% CI 1.04-1.44),衣原体或淋病感染者对注射式 PrEP 的偏好也越高(aRRR 2.53;95% CI 1.08-5.90),而性伴侣为 HIV 感染者或 HIV 感染状况不明的参与者对注射式 PrEP 的偏好较低(aRRR 0.30;95% CI 0.10-0.91)。对 PrEP 植入物的偏好也随着年龄的增长而增加(aRRR 1.42;95% CI 1.14-1.77),在过去 3 个月中≥10 个性伴侣的参与者中,对 PrEP 植入物的偏好较高(aRRR 3.14;95% CI 1.16-8.55),而在有 HIV 感染者或 HIV 感染状况未知的性伴侣的参与者中,对 PrEP 植入物的偏好较低(aRRR 0.25;95% CI 0.07-0.92)。AGYW对生物医学PrEP方法的偏好各不相同,性行为风险较高的人群偏好长效方法。由于我们预计会有更多可用的 PrEP 选项,因此应支持 AGYW 使用口服 PrEP,尤其是那些性伴侣感染了 HIV 或 HIV 感染状况不明的 AGYW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preference for novel biomedical HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis methods among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda: a mixed methods study
Novel HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) methods including a potential future HIV vaccine, will increase prevention options for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) at high risk of HIV infection in Eastern and Southern Africa, yet data on AGYW’s preferences for various PrEP methods is limited. We investigated preferences for five biomedical PrEP methods (oral, injectable, vaginal ring, implant, HIV vaccine) among 14–24-years-old AGYW in Kampala, Uganda.From January to December 2019, we conducted a mixed methods study including 265 high-risk AGYW. After receiving two education sessions on the five PrEP methods, participants were asked about their “most preferred PrEP method.” Multinomial logistic regression (oral PrEP as reference category) was used to determine participant characteristics associated with method preference. Results are presented as adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 selected participants to examine reasons influencing PrEP preferences and suggestions for method improvements. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.Participants preferred methods were: HIV vaccine (34.7%), oral PrEP (25.7%), injectable PrEP (24.9%), PrEP implant (13.6%), and vaginal ring (1.1%). Preference for injectable PrEP increased with every year of age (aRRR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04–1.44) and among participants with chlamydia or gonorrhoea (aRRR 2.53; 95% CI 1.08–5.90), while it was lower among participants having sexual partner(s) living with HIV or of unknown HIV status (aRRR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10–0.91). Preference for PrEP implants also increased with age (aRRR 1.42; 95% CI 1.14–1.77) and was strong among participants having ≥10 sexual partners in the past 3 months (aRRR 3.14; 95% CI 1.16–8.55), while it was lower among those with sexual partner(s) living with HIV or of unknown HIV status (aRRR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07–0.92). PrEP method preference was influenced by product attributes and prior experiences with similar product forms commonly used in health care.AGYW have varied preferences for biomedical PrEP method and those with higher sexual behavioral risk prefer long-acting methods. As we anticipate more available PrEP options, oral PrEP use should be supported among AGYW, especially for those with sexual partners living with HIV or of unknown HIV status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信