听者方言差异对第二语言语音可理解性和重音判断的影响

Payam Ghaffarvand-Mokari
{"title":"听者方言差异对第二语言语音可理解性和重音判断的影响","authors":"Payam Ghaffarvand-Mokari","doi":"10.1075/jslp.23018.gha","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigated the impact of listeners’ dialectal variations within the same L1 on perceptions of L2\n speech comprehensibility and accentedness. Thirty untrained British and American English-L1 raters assessed recorded L2 speech\n samples from 29 Finnish learners of English and provided scalar judgments for their comprehensibility and accentedness. Four\n linguistically trained graduate students evaluated the samples for segmental accuracy, speech rate, word stress and intonation.\n Results of linear mixed models indicated no significant effect of raters’ L1 variety on global comprehensibility and accentedness\n ratings. While American and British raters relied on same pronunciation features in their comprehensibility judgments, they placed\n different levels of importance on pronunciation features when making accentedness judgments. Particularly, both groups primarily\n exhibited sensitivity towards segmental errors in their assessments of accentedness, whereas American raters demonstrated an\n additional sensitivity to intonation. The findings underscore the complexity of accent perception based on the L1 variety of\n listeners.","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of listeners’ dialectal variation on comprehensibility and accentedness judgements of second language\\n speech\",\"authors\":\"Payam Ghaffarvand-Mokari\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jslp.23018.gha\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study investigated the impact of listeners’ dialectal variations within the same L1 on perceptions of L2\\n speech comprehensibility and accentedness. Thirty untrained British and American English-L1 raters assessed recorded L2 speech\\n samples from 29 Finnish learners of English and provided scalar judgments for their comprehensibility and accentedness. Four\\n linguistically trained graduate students evaluated the samples for segmental accuracy, speech rate, word stress and intonation.\\n Results of linear mixed models indicated no significant effect of raters’ L1 variety on global comprehensibility and accentedness\\n ratings. While American and British raters relied on same pronunciation features in their comprehensibility judgments, they placed\\n different levels of importance on pronunciation features when making accentedness judgments. Particularly, both groups primarily\\n exhibited sensitivity towards segmental errors in their assessments of accentedness, whereas American raters demonstrated an\\n additional sensitivity to intonation. The findings underscore the complexity of accent perception based on the L1 variety of\\n listeners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of second language pronunciation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of second language pronunciation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23018.gha\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of second language pronunciation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23018.gha","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了听者在同一 L1 中的方言差异对 L2 语音可理解性和重音感知的影响。30 位未经训练的英美英语一级评测员评估了 29 位芬兰英语学习者录制的 L2 语音样本,并对其可理解性和重音性进行了标度判断。四名受过语言培训的研究生对样本的分段准确性、语速、单词重音和语调进行了评估。线性混合模型的结果表明,评分者的母语种类对总体可理解性和重音评分没有明显影响。虽然美国和英国的评分者在进行可理解性判断时依赖于相同的发音特征,但他们在进行重音判断时对发音特征的重视程度却不同。特别是,在评估重音程度时,两组人都主要表现出对音段错误的敏感性,而美国评分者则表现出对语调的额外敏感性。这些研究结果凸显了基于听者母语的口音感知的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of listeners’ dialectal variation on comprehensibility and accentedness judgements of second language speech
This study investigated the impact of listeners’ dialectal variations within the same L1 on perceptions of L2 speech comprehensibility and accentedness. Thirty untrained British and American English-L1 raters assessed recorded L2 speech samples from 29 Finnish learners of English and provided scalar judgments for their comprehensibility and accentedness. Four linguistically trained graduate students evaluated the samples for segmental accuracy, speech rate, word stress and intonation. Results of linear mixed models indicated no significant effect of raters’ L1 variety on global comprehensibility and accentedness ratings. While American and British raters relied on same pronunciation features in their comprehensibility judgments, they placed different levels of importance on pronunciation features when making accentedness judgments. Particularly, both groups primarily exhibited sensitivity towards segmental errors in their assessments of accentedness, whereas American raters demonstrated an additional sensitivity to intonation. The findings underscore the complexity of accent perception based on the L1 variety of listeners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信