M. Primasari, I. D. Saputro, L. Hariani, Glorian Paul Bosco Velusamy
{"title":"利用十二烷基硫酸钠和生物力学特性测试开发猪细胞真皮基质","authors":"M. Primasari, I. D. Saputro, L. Hariani, Glorian Paul Bosco Velusamy","doi":"10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_2_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n An alternative for supporting wound closure is acellular dermal matrix (ADM), which serves as a scaffold. Humans and porcine possess a similar biochemical makeup. Using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a decellularization technique was developed and its biomechanical properties were assessed.\n \n \n \n This work uses a pig dermis layer for an in vitro experimental investigation with a posttest-only control group. Using SDS 0.5% for 14 days, the decellularization procedure compares the biomechanical properties and cellular components of the ADM with control. The Mann–Whitney U-test for data with a nonnormal distribution or the t-test for continuous variables with a normal distribution was used for the study.\n \n \n \n Histological analysis revealed that none of the cells were detected in four fields of analysis in the treatment group; however, 48.00 ± 4.86 cells were observed in the control group (P < 0.001); the collagen organization in the control group appeared to be identical. The variables elastic modulus (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556), thickness (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397), and width (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) did not differ statistically. The following data showed significant differences between the treatment group and the control group: break strain (%) (108.46 vs. 67.48; P < 0.001) and tensile strength stress (MPa) (19.916 vs. 22.1; P = 0.030).\n \n \n \n SDS decellularization is an efficient method for creating an ADM. Although the break strain was considerably lower, the treatment group’s tensile strength was higher. Elastic modulus changes were not observed.\n","PeriodicalId":9324,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix by Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Biomechanical Property Testing\",\"authors\":\"M. Primasari, I. D. Saputro, L. Hariani, Glorian Paul Bosco Velusamy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_2_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n An alternative for supporting wound closure is acellular dermal matrix (ADM), which serves as a scaffold. Humans and porcine possess a similar biochemical makeup. Using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a decellularization technique was developed and its biomechanical properties were assessed.\\n \\n \\n \\n This work uses a pig dermis layer for an in vitro experimental investigation with a posttest-only control group. Using SDS 0.5% for 14 days, the decellularization procedure compares the biomechanical properties and cellular components of the ADM with control. The Mann–Whitney U-test for data with a nonnormal distribution or the t-test for continuous variables with a normal distribution was used for the study.\\n \\n \\n \\n Histological analysis revealed that none of the cells were detected in four fields of analysis in the treatment group; however, 48.00 ± 4.86 cells were observed in the control group (P < 0.001); the collagen organization in the control group appeared to be identical. The variables elastic modulus (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556), thickness (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397), and width (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) did not differ statistically. The following data showed significant differences between the treatment group and the control group: break strain (%) (108.46 vs. 67.48; P < 0.001) and tensile strength stress (MPa) (19.916 vs. 22.1; P = 0.030).\\n \\n \\n \\n SDS decellularization is an efficient method for creating an ADM. Although the break strain was considerably lower, the treatment group’s tensile strength was higher. Elastic modulus changes were not observed.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":9324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_2_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_2_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 支持伤口闭合的另一种方法是用作支架的非细胞真皮基质(ADM)。人和猪具有相似的生化结构。利用十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)开发了一种脱细胞技术,并对其生物力学特性进行了评估。 这项工作使用猪的真皮层进行体外实验研究,并设置了一个只进行试验后对照组。脱细胞程序使用 0.5% 的 SDS,持续 14 天,将 ADM 的生物力学特性和细胞成分与对照组进行比较。对于非正态分布的数据采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验,对于正态分布的连续变量采用 t 检验。 组织学分析表明,治疗组在四个分析视野中均未检测到细胞;但对照组观察到 48.00 ± 4.86 个细胞(P < 0.001);对照组的胶原组织似乎相同。弹性模量 (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556)、厚度 (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397) 和宽度 (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) 这些变量在统计学上没有差异。以下数据显示处理组与对照组之间存在显著差异:断裂应变(%)(108.46 对 67.48;P < 0.001)和拉伸强度应力(兆帕)(19.916 对 22.1;P = 0.030)。 SDS 脱细胞是创建 ADM 的有效方法。虽然断裂应变大大降低,但处理组的拉伸强度更高。未观察到弹性模量的变化。
Developing Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix by Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Biomechanical Property Testing
ABSTRACT
An alternative for supporting wound closure is acellular dermal matrix (ADM), which serves as a scaffold. Humans and porcine possess a similar biochemical makeup. Using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a decellularization technique was developed and its biomechanical properties were assessed.
This work uses a pig dermis layer for an in vitro experimental investigation with a posttest-only control group. Using SDS 0.5% for 14 days, the decellularization procedure compares the biomechanical properties and cellular components of the ADM with control. The Mann–Whitney U-test for data with a nonnormal distribution or the t-test for continuous variables with a normal distribution was used for the study.
Histological analysis revealed that none of the cells were detected in four fields of analysis in the treatment group; however, 48.00 ± 4.86 cells were observed in the control group (P < 0.001); the collagen organization in the control group appeared to be identical. The variables elastic modulus (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556), thickness (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397), and width (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) did not differ statistically. The following data showed significant differences between the treatment group and the control group: break strain (%) (108.46 vs. 67.48; P < 0.001) and tensile strength stress (MPa) (19.916 vs. 22.1; P = 0.030).
SDS decellularization is an efficient method for creating an ADM. Although the break strain was considerably lower, the treatment group’s tensile strength was higher. Elastic modulus changes were not observed.