P.067 慢性偏头痛的药物预防:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析

M. Khalili, A. Liaghatdar, F. Mahdian, T. Levit, S. Moradi, E. Hedayati, K. Torabiardakani, F. Ahmadi, S. Khademioore, A. Sofi-Mahmudi, T. Atkin-Jones, V. Patil, F. Mirzayeh Fashami, S. Mehmandoost, S Sharma, M. Fereshtehnejad, J. Busse, B. Sadeghirad
{"title":"P.067 慢性偏头痛的药物预防:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"M. Khalili, A. Liaghatdar, F. Mahdian, T. Levit, S. Moradi, E. Hedayati, K. Torabiardakani, F. Ahmadi, S. Khademioore, A. Sofi-Mahmudi, T. Atkin-Jones, V. Patil, F. Mirzayeh Fashami, S. Mehmandoost, S Sharma, M. Fereshtehnejad, J. Busse, B. Sadeghirad","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the comparative effectiveness of available pharmacological prophylaxis for migraines. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 2023 for trials that: (1) enrolled adults diagnosed with chronic migraine, and (2) randomized them to any prophylactic medication vs. another medication or placebo. We performed a random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis for patient-important outcomes. Results: We included 193 randomized trials. Compared to placebo, CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mean difference [MD] -1.7, 95%CI: -1.1 to -2.2), injection of botulinum toxin (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.7 to -2.9), calcium channel blockers (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.5 to -3.0), beta-blockers (MD -1.4, 95%CI: -0.2 to -2.6), and anticonvulsants (MD -1.1, 95%CI: -0.4 to -1.8) were among the most effective treatments in reducing average number of headache days per months. Anticonvulsants (Risk Ratio [RR] 2.3, 95%CI: 1.8 to 3.0), calcium channel blockers (RR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.1), and tricyclic antidepressants (RR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8) showed the highest risk of discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CGRP inhibitors, botulinum toxin, and beta-blockers may provide the greatest benefit, and tolerability, for reducing the frequency of migraine headaches.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P.067 Pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"M. Khalili, A. Liaghatdar, F. Mahdian, T. Levit, S. Moradi, E. Hedayati, K. Torabiardakani, F. Ahmadi, S. Khademioore, A. Sofi-Mahmudi, T. Atkin-Jones, V. Patil, F. Mirzayeh Fashami, S. Mehmandoost, S Sharma, M. Fereshtehnejad, J. Busse, B. Sadeghirad\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the comparative effectiveness of available pharmacological prophylaxis for migraines. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 2023 for trials that: (1) enrolled adults diagnosed with chronic migraine, and (2) randomized them to any prophylactic medication vs. another medication or placebo. We performed a random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis for patient-important outcomes. Results: We included 193 randomized trials. Compared to placebo, CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mean difference [MD] -1.7, 95%CI: -1.1 to -2.2), injection of botulinum toxin (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.7 to -2.9), calcium channel blockers (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.5 to -3.0), beta-blockers (MD -1.4, 95%CI: -0.2 to -2.6), and anticonvulsants (MD -1.1, 95%CI: -0.4 to -1.8) were among the most effective treatments in reducing average number of headache days per months. Anticonvulsants (Risk Ratio [RR] 2.3, 95%CI: 1.8 to 3.0), calcium channel blockers (RR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.1), and tricyclic antidepressants (RR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8) showed the highest risk of discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CGRP inhibitors, botulinum toxin, and beta-blockers may provide the greatest benefit, and tolerability, for reducing the frequency of migraine headaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们对随机对照试验进行了网络荟萃分析,以评估现有偏头痛药物预防疗法的比较效果。方法我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane CENTRAL(截至 2023 年 10 月)中符合以下条件的试验:(1)招募了被诊断为慢性偏头痛的成年人,(2)将他们随机分配到任何预防性药物与另一种药物或安慰剂中。我们对患者重要结果进行了随机效应频数网络荟萃分析。分析结果我们纳入了 193 项随机试验。与安慰剂相比,CGRP单克隆抗体(平均差[MD]-1.7,95%CI:-1.1至-2.2)、注射肉毒杆菌毒素(MD-1.8,95%CI:-0.7至-2.9)、钙通道阻滞剂(MD-1.8,95%CI:-0.5至-3.0)、β-受体阻滞剂(MD-1.4,95%CI:-0.2至-2.6)和抗惊厥药(MD-1.1,95%CI:-0.4至-1.8)是减少每月平均头痛天数的最有效治疗方法。抗惊厥药(风险比 [RR] 2.3,95%CI:1.8 至 3.0)、钙通道阻滞剂(RR 1.8,95%CI:1.1 至 3.1)和三环类抗抑郁药(RR 2.3,95%CI:1.3 至 3.8)因不良反应而停药的风险最高。结论我们的研究结果表明,CGRP抑制剂、肉毒杆菌毒素和β-受体阻滞剂可为降低偏头痛频率提供最大的益处和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
P.067 Pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the comparative effectiveness of available pharmacological prophylaxis for migraines. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 2023 for trials that: (1) enrolled adults diagnosed with chronic migraine, and (2) randomized them to any prophylactic medication vs. another medication or placebo. We performed a random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis for patient-important outcomes. Results: We included 193 randomized trials. Compared to placebo, CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mean difference [MD] -1.7, 95%CI: -1.1 to -2.2), injection of botulinum toxin (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.7 to -2.9), calcium channel blockers (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.5 to -3.0), beta-blockers (MD -1.4, 95%CI: -0.2 to -2.6), and anticonvulsants (MD -1.1, 95%CI: -0.4 to -1.8) were among the most effective treatments in reducing average number of headache days per months. Anticonvulsants (Risk Ratio [RR] 2.3, 95%CI: 1.8 to 3.0), calcium channel blockers (RR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.1), and tricyclic antidepressants (RR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8) showed the highest risk of discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CGRP inhibitors, botulinum toxin, and beta-blockers may provide the greatest benefit, and tolerability, for reducing the frequency of migraine headaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信