用 BNT162b2 和 Gam-COVID-Vac 免疫 SARS-CoV-2 后的效果以及医护人员的中和抗体滴度

M. Emin, D. Cibrev, Coskun Kerala, D. Petrovska-Cvetkovska, Valdrina Ajeti, H. Ampova, I. Kostovska, K. Tosheska-Trajkovska
{"title":"用 BNT162b2 和 Gam-COVID-Vac 免疫 SARS-CoV-2 后的效果以及医护人员的中和抗体滴度","authors":"M. Emin, D. Cibrev, Coskun Kerala, D. Petrovska-Cvetkovska, Valdrina Ajeti, H. Ampova, I. Kostovska, K. Tosheska-Trajkovska","doi":"10.1515/tjb-2023-0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of the vaccines (Tozinameran and Sputnik V), administered on a convenience sample of healthcare workers, and also to describe the relationship between the levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and the type of vaccine used, as well as their association with incident cases during follow-up.\n \n \n \n The study included 262 participants, who underwent vaccination during the period from September 2021 until August 2022. For determining the levels of NAbs we used the CLIA based method, and all the samples were processed with the SNIBE Maglumi 800 analyzer. The patients were observed for one year for occurrence of incident infection.\n \n \n \n The participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 positivity showed substantially higher titer of NAbs (8.86 vs. 0.94, p<0.001). The participants in the Gam-COVID-Vac group had median levels of NAbs of 1.57 (IQR 0.42–5.73), while they in the Tozinameran group showed substantially higher levels of 2.37 (IQR 0.9–6.27). The incident cases after immunization had substantially lower median values of NAbs when compared to the rest (0.48 vs. 3.97, p<0.001), and the interval between the second dose and the serological measurements were similar.\n \n \n \n The current study showed that the tested vaccines demonstrated vaccine effectiveness of over 50 % during the first year after the vaccination in a sample of health care workers. Although health care workers remain separate population group, when compared to the rest, the results could be extrapolated to populations with similar age and immune experience.\n","PeriodicalId":23344,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","volume":"64 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness after immunization with BNT162b2 and Gam-COVID-Vac for SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibody titers in health care workers\",\"authors\":\"M. Emin, D. Cibrev, Coskun Kerala, D. Petrovska-Cvetkovska, Valdrina Ajeti, H. Ampova, I. Kostovska, K. Tosheska-Trajkovska\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tjb-2023-0213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of the vaccines (Tozinameran and Sputnik V), administered on a convenience sample of healthcare workers, and also to describe the relationship between the levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and the type of vaccine used, as well as their association with incident cases during follow-up.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study included 262 participants, who underwent vaccination during the period from September 2021 until August 2022. For determining the levels of NAbs we used the CLIA based method, and all the samples were processed with the SNIBE Maglumi 800 analyzer. The patients were observed for one year for occurrence of incident infection.\\n \\n \\n \\n The participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 positivity showed substantially higher titer of NAbs (8.86 vs. 0.94, p<0.001). The participants in the Gam-COVID-Vac group had median levels of NAbs of 1.57 (IQR 0.42–5.73), while they in the Tozinameran group showed substantially higher levels of 2.37 (IQR 0.9–6.27). The incident cases after immunization had substantially lower median values of NAbs when compared to the rest (0.48 vs. 3.97, p<0.001), and the interval between the second dose and the serological measurements were similar.\\n \\n \\n \\n The current study showed that the tested vaccines demonstrated vaccine effectiveness of over 50 % during the first year after the vaccination in a sample of health care workers. Although health care workers remain separate population group, when compared to the rest, the results could be extrapolated to populations with similar age and immune experience.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":23344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"64 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2023-0213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2023-0213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述在方便抽样的医疗工作者中接种的疫苗(Tozinameran 和 Sputnik V)的有效性,同时描述中和抗体(NAbs)水平与所用疫苗类型之间的关系,以及它们与随访期间发生的病例之间的关联。 这项研究包括 262 名参与者,他们在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月期间接种了疫苗。我们采用基于 CLIA 的方法来确定 NAbs 的水平,所有样本均使用 SNIBE Maglumi 800 分析仪进行处理。我们对患者进行了为期一年的观察,以确定是否发生感染。 曾出现过 SARS-CoV-2 阳性的参与者的 NAbs 滴度要高得多(8.86 对 0.94,P<0.001)。Gam-COVID-Vac 组参与者的 NAbs 中位数为 1.57(IQR 0.42-5.73),而 Tozinameran 组参与者的 NAbs 中位数则高达 2.37(IQR 0.9-6.27)。免疫接种后的病例与其他病例相比,NAbs 的中位值要低得多(0.48 vs. 3.97,p<0.001),而且第二次接种与血清学测量之间的间隔时间相似。 目前的研究表明,在医护人员样本中,测试的疫苗在接种后第一年的疫苗有效性超过 50%。尽管医护人员仍然是一个独立的人群,但与其他人群相比,研究结果可以推广到具有相似年龄和免疫经验的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness after immunization with BNT162b2 and Gam-COVID-Vac for SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibody titers in health care workers
The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of the vaccines (Tozinameran and Sputnik V), administered on a convenience sample of healthcare workers, and also to describe the relationship between the levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and the type of vaccine used, as well as their association with incident cases during follow-up. The study included 262 participants, who underwent vaccination during the period from September 2021 until August 2022. For determining the levels of NAbs we used the CLIA based method, and all the samples were processed with the SNIBE Maglumi 800 analyzer. The patients were observed for one year for occurrence of incident infection. The participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 positivity showed substantially higher titer of NAbs (8.86 vs. 0.94, p<0.001). The participants in the Gam-COVID-Vac group had median levels of NAbs of 1.57 (IQR 0.42–5.73), while they in the Tozinameran group showed substantially higher levels of 2.37 (IQR 0.9–6.27). The incident cases after immunization had substantially lower median values of NAbs when compared to the rest (0.48 vs. 3.97, p<0.001), and the interval between the second dose and the serological measurements were similar. The current study showed that the tested vaccines demonstrated vaccine effectiveness of over 50 % during the first year after the vaccination in a sample of health care workers. Although health care workers remain separate population group, when compared to the rest, the results could be extrapolated to populations with similar age and immune experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信