{"title":"P.149 萨斯喀彻温省脊柱路径分类与腰骶部融合术后疗效和提高质量调整生命年有关","authors":"B. Ridha, E. Liu, A. Persad, DR Fourney","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability and decreased quality of life. The Saskatchewan Spine Pathway classification (SSPc) is a method for triaging patients who are candidates for surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent lumbosacral instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal pathology from Jan 1, 2012, to Sept 20, 2018, by a single surgeon at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by SSPc into 4 groups based on pain pattern. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Outcomes were compared between cohorts both for absolute values and achieving MCID. Results: 169 consecutive patients were included in our study. After stratifying by SSPc grouping, there were 61 SSPc I patients, 45 SSPc III patients, and 63 SSPc IV patients. Patients in all groups had clinical improvement following surgery. Patients classified as SSPc III had superior outcomes in ODI, EQ-5D and EQ-VAS, and were more likely to achieve the MCID for ED-5D. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SSPc grouping is an independent predictor of final VAS back, ODI, EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS as well as achieving the MCID for EQ-5D. Conclusions: The SSPc classification is associated with outcomes following lumbosacral fusion. In particular, patients with SSPc pattern 3 had better outcomes and improved QALY.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"74 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P.149 Saskatchewan spine pathway classification is associated with post-operative outcome and improved quality-adjusted life years following lumbosacral fusion\",\"authors\":\"B. Ridha, E. Liu, A. Persad, DR Fourney\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability and decreased quality of life. The Saskatchewan Spine Pathway classification (SSPc) is a method for triaging patients who are candidates for surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent lumbosacral instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal pathology from Jan 1, 2012, to Sept 20, 2018, by a single surgeon at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by SSPc into 4 groups based on pain pattern. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Outcomes were compared between cohorts both for absolute values and achieving MCID. Results: 169 consecutive patients were included in our study. After stratifying by SSPc grouping, there were 61 SSPc I patients, 45 SSPc III patients, and 63 SSPc IV patients. Patients in all groups had clinical improvement following surgery. Patients classified as SSPc III had superior outcomes in ODI, EQ-5D and EQ-VAS, and were more likely to achieve the MCID for ED-5D. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SSPc grouping is an independent predictor of final VAS back, ODI, EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS as well as achieving the MCID for EQ-5D. Conclusions: The SSPc classification is associated with outcomes following lumbosacral fusion. In particular, patients with SSPc pattern 3 had better outcomes and improved QALY.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"volume\":\"74 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
P.149 Saskatchewan spine pathway classification is associated with post-operative outcome and improved quality-adjusted life years following lumbosacral fusion
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability and decreased quality of life. The Saskatchewan Spine Pathway classification (SSPc) is a method for triaging patients who are candidates for surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent lumbosacral instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal pathology from Jan 1, 2012, to Sept 20, 2018, by a single surgeon at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by SSPc into 4 groups based on pain pattern. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Outcomes were compared between cohorts both for absolute values and achieving MCID. Results: 169 consecutive patients were included in our study. After stratifying by SSPc grouping, there were 61 SSPc I patients, 45 SSPc III patients, and 63 SSPc IV patients. Patients in all groups had clinical improvement following surgery. Patients classified as SSPc III had superior outcomes in ODI, EQ-5D and EQ-VAS, and were more likely to achieve the MCID for ED-5D. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SSPc grouping is an independent predictor of final VAS back, ODI, EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS as well as achieving the MCID for EQ-5D. Conclusions: The SSPc classification is associated with outcomes following lumbosacral fusion. In particular, patients with SSPc pattern 3 had better outcomes and improved QALY.