在剖宫产脊髓麻醉中添加鞘内咪达唑仑作为辅助药物的产妇和新生儿结局:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析

T. Hung, Y. Huang, Y. Lin
{"title":"在剖宫产脊髓麻醉中添加鞘内咪达唑仑作为辅助药物的产妇和新生儿结局:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"T. Hung, Y. Huang, Y. Lin","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0001016120.15111.ba","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110786 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110786.)\n In 2015, global cesarean deliveries (CD) reached 29.7 million. While evidence indicates comparable outcomes between general and regional anesthesia, the latter is preferred for elective CD due to benefits like reduced fetal exposure to anesthetics. Intrathecal bupivacaine is effective but can cause adverse effects like hypotension. Low-dose bupivacaine minimizes risks but may require additional analgesics, potentially leading to general anesthesia. Various adjuvants, such as opioids and alpha-2-agonists, enhance spinal anesthesia quality, each with unique effects. Intrathecal midazolam, studied since the 1980s, has shown promise in reducing nausea and vomiting. However, its safety for neonates and effectiveness in cesarean delivery remained uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to fill this gap by comprehensively assessing the efficacy and safety of adding intrathecal midazolam to spinal anesthesia for CD in healthy pregnant patients, considering maternal and neonatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19432,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","volume":"7 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes With the Addition of Intrathecal Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"T. Hung, Y. Huang, Y. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aoa.0001016120.15111.ba\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110786 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110786.)\\n In 2015, global cesarean deliveries (CD) reached 29.7 million. While evidence indicates comparable outcomes between general and regional anesthesia, the latter is preferred for elective CD due to benefits like reduced fetal exposure to anesthetics. Intrathecal bupivacaine is effective but can cause adverse effects like hypotension. Low-dose bupivacaine minimizes risks but may require additional analgesics, potentially leading to general anesthesia. Various adjuvants, such as opioids and alpha-2-agonists, enhance spinal anesthesia quality, each with unique effects. Intrathecal midazolam, studied since the 1980s, has shown promise in reducing nausea and vomiting. However, its safety for neonates and effectiveness in cesarean delivery remained uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to fill this gap by comprehensively assessing the efficacy and safety of adding intrathecal midazolam to spinal anesthesia for CD in healthy pregnant patients, considering maternal and neonatal outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"volume\":\"7 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001016120.15111.ba\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001016120.15111.ba","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110786 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110786.)2015年,全球剖宫产(CD)达到2970万例。虽然有证据表明全身麻醉和区域麻醉的效果相当,但由于可减少胎儿对麻醉药的暴露等优点,选择性剖宫产首选后者。鞘内注射布比卡因效果显著,但可能导致低血压等不良反应。低剂量布比卡因可将风险降至最低,但可能需要额外的镇痛剂,从而可能导致全身麻醉。阿片类药物和α-2-激动剂等各种辅助药物可提高脊髓麻醉的质量,但每种药物都有其独特的效果。自 20 世纪 80 年代开始研究的鞘内咪达唑仑有望减少恶心和呕吐。然而,它对新生儿的安全性和剖宫产的有效性仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在填补这一空白,全面评估在健康孕妇的脊髓麻醉中加入鞘内咪达唑仑进行剖宫产的有效性和安全性,同时考虑到孕产妇和新生儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes With the Addition of Intrathecal Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
(J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110786 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110786.) In 2015, global cesarean deliveries (CD) reached 29.7 million. While evidence indicates comparable outcomes between general and regional anesthesia, the latter is preferred for elective CD due to benefits like reduced fetal exposure to anesthetics. Intrathecal bupivacaine is effective but can cause adverse effects like hypotension. Low-dose bupivacaine minimizes risks but may require additional analgesics, potentially leading to general anesthesia. Various adjuvants, such as opioids and alpha-2-agonists, enhance spinal anesthesia quality, each with unique effects. Intrathecal midazolam, studied since the 1980s, has shown promise in reducing nausea and vomiting. However, its safety for neonates and effectiveness in cesarean delivery remained uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to fill this gap by comprehensively assessing the efficacy and safety of adding intrathecal midazolam to spinal anesthesia for CD in healthy pregnant patients, considering maternal and neonatal outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信