C. Argoff, SP Herzog, RM Smith, S. Soni-Brahmbhatt, SF Awad, D. Asher, F. Khan, JK Bougie, J. Miron
{"title":"P.004 对于曾接受过皮下预防性偏头痛治疗的慢性偏头痛患者,静脉注射eptinezumab的实际效果","authors":"C. Argoff, SP Herzog, RM Smith, S. Soni-Brahmbhatt, SF Awad, D. Asher, F. Khan, JK Bougie, J. Miron","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Since 2018, several CGRP-targeted therapies have entered the migraine market, including eptinezumab. Minimal evidence exists evaluating the real-world effectiveness of switching from a subcutaneous to an intravenous anti-CGRP mAb. Methods: An observational, multi-site (n=4), US-based study, REVIEW evaluated real-world experiences of patients with chronic migraine (CM) treated with eptinezumab using a chart review, patient survey, and physician interviews. Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of CM who had completed ≥2 consecutive eptinezumab infusion cycles were eligible. Results: Enrolled patients were primarily female (83%, 78/94), had a mean age of 49 years and a mean migraine diagnosis duration of 15.4 years. All patients (94/94) self-reported prior preventive therapy with 89% (84/94) reporting prior subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAb use (i.e., fremanezumab, galcanezumab, or erenumab). Regardless of prior exposure to a CGRP ligand or receptor blocker, the number of “good” days/month more than doubled following eptinezumab. Patients experienced a similar mean change in the number of “good” days/month regardless of the number and type of previous subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAb used. Conclusions: This real-world, patient survey showed that patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs had high overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of eptinezumab treatment regardless of the number and type of previous therapies used.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"3 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P.004 Real-world effectiveness of intravenous eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine and previous subcutaneous preventive migraine treatment\",\"authors\":\"C. Argoff, SP Herzog, RM Smith, S. Soni-Brahmbhatt, SF Awad, D. Asher, F. Khan, JK Bougie, J. Miron\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Since 2018, several CGRP-targeted therapies have entered the migraine market, including eptinezumab. Minimal evidence exists evaluating the real-world effectiveness of switching from a subcutaneous to an intravenous anti-CGRP mAb. Methods: An observational, multi-site (n=4), US-based study, REVIEW evaluated real-world experiences of patients with chronic migraine (CM) treated with eptinezumab using a chart review, patient survey, and physician interviews. Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of CM who had completed ≥2 consecutive eptinezumab infusion cycles were eligible. Results: Enrolled patients were primarily female (83%, 78/94), had a mean age of 49 years and a mean migraine diagnosis duration of 15.4 years. All patients (94/94) self-reported prior preventive therapy with 89% (84/94) reporting prior subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAb use (i.e., fremanezumab, galcanezumab, or erenumab). Regardless of prior exposure to a CGRP ligand or receptor blocker, the number of “good” days/month more than doubled following eptinezumab. Patients experienced a similar mean change in the number of “good” days/month regardless of the number and type of previous subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAb used. Conclusions: This real-world, patient survey showed that patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs had high overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of eptinezumab treatment regardless of the number and type of previous therapies used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"volume\":\"3 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:自2018年以来,包括eptinezumab在内的几种CGRP靶向疗法已进入偏头痛市场。评估从皮下注射转为静脉注射抗 CGRP mAb 实际效果的证据极少。研究方法REVIEW是一项基于美国的多站点(n=4)观察性研究,通过病历回顾、患者调查和医生访谈,评估了接受eptinezumab治疗的慢性偏头痛(CM)患者的实际体验。研究对象为确诊为慢性偏头痛且已完成≥2个连续eptinezumab输注周期的成人(≥18岁)。研究结果入组患者主要为女性(83%,78/94),平均年龄为49岁,平均偏头痛诊断持续时间为15.4年。所有患者(94/94)均自述曾接受过预防性治疗,其中89%(84/94)的患者自述曾使用过皮下抗CGRP mAb(即fremanezumab、galcanezumab或erenumab)。无论患者之前是否使用过 CGRP 配体或受体阻断剂,使用埃妥珠单抗后,每月 "好 "天数增加了一倍多。无论之前使用的皮下抗 CGRP mAb 的数量和类型如何,患者每月 "好 "天数的平均变化相似。结论这项真实世界的患者调查显示,无论以前使用过多少种皮下注射抗CGRP mAb,以前使用过皮下注射抗CGRP mAb的患者对eptinezumab治疗效果的总体满意度都很高。
P.004 Real-world effectiveness of intravenous eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine and previous subcutaneous preventive migraine treatment
Background: Since 2018, several CGRP-targeted therapies have entered the migraine market, including eptinezumab. Minimal evidence exists evaluating the real-world effectiveness of switching from a subcutaneous to an intravenous anti-CGRP mAb. Methods: An observational, multi-site (n=4), US-based study, REVIEW evaluated real-world experiences of patients with chronic migraine (CM) treated with eptinezumab using a chart review, patient survey, and physician interviews. Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of CM who had completed ≥2 consecutive eptinezumab infusion cycles were eligible. Results: Enrolled patients were primarily female (83%, 78/94), had a mean age of 49 years and a mean migraine diagnosis duration of 15.4 years. All patients (94/94) self-reported prior preventive therapy with 89% (84/94) reporting prior subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAb use (i.e., fremanezumab, galcanezumab, or erenumab). Regardless of prior exposure to a CGRP ligand or receptor blocker, the number of “good” days/month more than doubled following eptinezumab. Patients experienced a similar mean change in the number of “good” days/month regardless of the number and type of previous subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAb used. Conclusions: This real-world, patient survey showed that patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs had high overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of eptinezumab treatment regardless of the number and type of previous therapies used.