采用距离比较法的增强型微分进化-Rao 优化及其在桁架结构优化尺寸中的应用

IF 3.1 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Hoang-Anh Pham , Tien-Chuong Vu
{"title":"采用距离比较法的增强型微分进化-Rao 优化及其在桁架结构优化尺寸中的应用","authors":"Hoang-Anh Pham ,&nbsp;Tien-Chuong Vu","doi":"10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A new decision-making approach based on distance measures is established in this study to effectively reduce unnecessary structural analyses in performing truss optimization by metaheuristic algorithms. This approach termed distance comparison (DiC) judges a new design candidate as worth evaluating by using its distance from the best solution. The new candidate solution will be omitted without evaluating it if it is not closer to the best solution than the one being compared. The DiC method is integrated with a novel hybrid metaheuristic based on differential evolution (DE) and the Rao algorithm. In the proposed hybrid strategy, a modified Rao algorithm and an enhanced DE are applied adaptively based on the population diversity to utilize the advantage of each one for a specific stage of the optimization process. Six truss sizing examples with continuous variables, including the 10-bar and 200-bar planar trusses and the 25-bar, 72-bar, 120-bar, and 942-bar spatial trusses, are examined to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Numerical results demonstrate that DiC significantly reduces the number of structural analyses. Moreover, the performance of the proposed hybrid metaheuristic algorithm conducted on the examples is better than that of some state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced differential evolution-Rao optimization with distance comparison method and its application in optimal sizing of truss structures\",\"authors\":\"Hoang-Anh Pham ,&nbsp;Tien-Chuong Vu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A new decision-making approach based on distance measures is established in this study to effectively reduce unnecessary structural analyses in performing truss optimization by metaheuristic algorithms. This approach termed distance comparison (DiC) judges a new design candidate as worth evaluating by using its distance from the best solution. The new candidate solution will be omitted without evaluating it if it is not closer to the best solution than the one being compared. The DiC method is integrated with a novel hybrid metaheuristic based on differential evolution (DE) and the Rao algorithm. In the proposed hybrid strategy, a modified Rao algorithm and an enhanced DE are applied adaptively based on the population diversity to utilize the advantage of each one for a specific stage of the optimization process. Six truss sizing examples with continuous variables, including the 10-bar and 200-bar planar trusses and the 25-bar, 72-bar, 120-bar, and 942-bar spatial trusses, are examined to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Numerical results demonstrate that DiC significantly reduces the number of structural analyses. Moreover, the performance of the proposed hybrid metaheuristic algorithm conducted on the examples is better than that of some state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computational Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324001200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324001200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究建立了一种基于距离度量的新决策方法,以有效减少元启发式算法在进行桁架优化时不必要的结构分析。这种方法被称为距离比较法(DiC),它通过一个新的候选设计方案与最佳方案的距离来判断该方案是否值得评估。如果新的候选方案与最佳方案之间的距离小于被比较方案,则该方案将被忽略而不予评估。DiC 方法与基于微分进化(DE)和 Rao 算法的新型混合元启发式相结合。在所提出的混合策略中,改进的 Rao 算法和增强的 DE 算法根据种群多样性自适应地应用,在优化过程的特定阶段利用每种算法的优势。研究了六个连续变量的桁架尺寸实例,包括 10 杆和 200 杆平面桁架以及 25 杆、72 杆、120 杆和 942 杆空间桁架,以评估所提方法的有效性。数值结果表明,DiC 大大减少了结构分析的次数。此外,所提出的混合元启发式算法在实例中的表现优于一些最先进的元启发式算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced differential evolution-Rao optimization with distance comparison method and its application in optimal sizing of truss structures

A new decision-making approach based on distance measures is established in this study to effectively reduce unnecessary structural analyses in performing truss optimization by metaheuristic algorithms. This approach termed distance comparison (DiC) judges a new design candidate as worth evaluating by using its distance from the best solution. The new candidate solution will be omitted without evaluating it if it is not closer to the best solution than the one being compared. The DiC method is integrated with a novel hybrid metaheuristic based on differential evolution (DE) and the Rao algorithm. In the proposed hybrid strategy, a modified Rao algorithm and an enhanced DE are applied adaptively based on the population diversity to utilize the advantage of each one for a specific stage of the optimization process. Six truss sizing examples with continuous variables, including the 10-bar and 200-bar planar trusses and the 25-bar, 72-bar, 120-bar, and 942-bar spatial trusses, are examined to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Numerical results demonstrate that DiC significantly reduces the number of structural analyses. Moreover, the performance of the proposed hybrid metaheuristic algorithm conducted on the examples is better than that of some state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Science
Journal of Computational Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
227
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Computational Science is a rapidly growing multi- and interdisciplinary field that uses advanced computing and data analysis to understand and solve complex problems. It has reached a level of predictive capability that now firmly complements the traditional pillars of experimentation and theory. The recent advances in experimental techniques such as detectors, on-line sensor networks and high-resolution imaging techniques, have opened up new windows into physical and biological processes at many levels of detail. The resulting data explosion allows for detailed data driven modeling and simulation. This new discipline in science combines computational thinking, modern computational methods, devices and collateral technologies to address problems far beyond the scope of traditional numerical methods. Computational science typically unifies three distinct elements: • Modeling, Algorithms and Simulations (e.g. numerical and non-numerical, discrete and continuous); • Software developed to solve science (e.g., biological, physical, and social), engineering, medicine, and humanities problems; • Computer and information science that develops and optimizes the advanced system hardware, software, networking, and data management components (e.g. problem solving environments).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信