焦躁不安的动作和早期运动能力在预测脊髓脊膜膨出症婴儿的活动能力结果中的作用

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fabiana Utsch , Liliane Baía Silva , Antônio Lopes da Cunha Júnior , Elaine Pessoa Alves , Cinthia Ramos Diniz Silva , Daniele Moreira Ferreira Vilaça , Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes
{"title":"焦躁不安的动作和早期运动能力在预测脊髓脊膜膨出症婴儿的活动能力结果中的作用","authors":"Fabiana Utsch ,&nbsp;Liliane Baía Silva ,&nbsp;Antônio Lopes da Cunha Júnior ,&nbsp;Elaine Pessoa Alves ,&nbsp;Cinthia Ramos Diniz Silva ,&nbsp;Daniele Moreira Ferreira Vilaça ,&nbsp;Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe fidgety movements and co-occurring movements and postures in infants with myelomeningocele (MMC) and their association with mobility at preschool ages.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort with early assessment via general movement assessment, followed by mobility assessment between 36 and 70 months of age.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve infants were included; 12 of 12 had fidgety movements in the upper limbs, with seven exhibiting them also in the hips and three in both the hips and ankles. The presence of fidgety movements in the lower limbs, kicking, a non-flat posture, a non-monotonous movement character, and a non-absent age-adequate movement repertoire were independently associated with mobility using the Hoffer modified classification and functional mobility scale (FMS) at 5 and 50 m. An optimality score was calculated based on leg movements and postures, ranging from 0 to 10 points. Infants who scored at least 4 points achieved household ambulation and FMS (5 m) of at least level 4. Community ambulation and an FMS (50 m) of level 5 were achieved with a score of at least 7.5.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Assessing fidgety movements with other leg movements and postures in infants with MMC provided relevant information that could potentially predict mobility at preschool age and thus could be used for early intervention planning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50481,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of fidgety movements and early motor repertoire in predicting mobility outcomes in infants with myelomeningocele\",\"authors\":\"Fabiana Utsch ,&nbsp;Liliane Baía Silva ,&nbsp;Antônio Lopes da Cunha Júnior ,&nbsp;Elaine Pessoa Alves ,&nbsp;Cinthia Ramos Diniz Silva ,&nbsp;Daniele Moreira Ferreira Vilaça ,&nbsp;Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe fidgety movements and co-occurring movements and postures in infants with myelomeningocele (MMC) and their association with mobility at preschool ages.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort with early assessment via general movement assessment, followed by mobility assessment between 36 and 70 months of age.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve infants were included; 12 of 12 had fidgety movements in the upper limbs, with seven exhibiting them also in the hips and three in both the hips and ankles. The presence of fidgety movements in the lower limbs, kicking, a non-flat posture, a non-monotonous movement character, and a non-absent age-adequate movement repertoire were independently associated with mobility using the Hoffer modified classification and functional mobility scale (FMS) at 5 and 50 m. An optimality score was calculated based on leg movements and postures, ranging from 0 to 10 points. Infants who scored at least 4 points achieved household ambulation and FMS (5 m) of at least level 4. Community ambulation and an FMS (50 m) of level 5 were achieved with a score of at least 7.5.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Assessing fidgety movements with other leg movements and postures in infants with MMC provided relevant information that could potentially predict mobility at preschool age and thus could be used for early intervention planning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824000643\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824000643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 采用回顾性队列,通过一般运动评估进行早期评估,然后在36至70个月大时进行活动能力评估。结果 12名婴儿中有12名上肢有烦躁动作,7名臀部也有烦躁动作,3名臀部和脚踝都有烦躁动作。根据霍弗(Hoffer)修订的分类和功能活动度量表(FMS),下肢出现烦躁不安动作、踢腿、姿势不平整、动作不单调以及不存在与年龄相符的动作剧目与5米和50米处的活动能力有独立关联。得分至少达到4分的婴儿可在家中行走,FMS(5米)至少达到4级。结论对患有多发性骨髓瘤的婴儿的烦躁动作及其他腿部动作和姿势进行评估可提供相关信息,这些信息有可能预测婴儿学龄前的活动能力,因此可用于早期干预计划的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of fidgety movements and early motor repertoire in predicting mobility outcomes in infants with myelomeningocele

Objective

To describe fidgety movements and co-occurring movements and postures in infants with myelomeningocele (MMC) and their association with mobility at preschool ages.

Methods

A retrospective cohort with early assessment via general movement assessment, followed by mobility assessment between 36 and 70 months of age.

Results

Twelve infants were included; 12 of 12 had fidgety movements in the upper limbs, with seven exhibiting them also in the hips and three in both the hips and ankles. The presence of fidgety movements in the lower limbs, kicking, a non-flat posture, a non-monotonous movement character, and a non-absent age-adequate movement repertoire were independently associated with mobility using the Hoffer modified classification and functional mobility scale (FMS) at 5 and 50 m. An optimality score was calculated based on leg movements and postures, ranging from 0 to 10 points. Infants who scored at least 4 points achieved household ambulation and FMS (5 m) of at least level 4. Community ambulation and an FMS (50 m) of level 5 were achieved with a score of at least 7.5.

Conclusions

Assessing fidgety movements with other leg movements and postures in infants with MMC provided relevant information that could potentially predict mobility at preschool age and thus could be used for early intervention planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Paediatric Neurology is the Official Journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, successor to the long-established European Federation of Child Neurology Societies. Under the guidance of a prestigious International editorial board, this multi-disciplinary journal publishes exciting clinical and experimental research in this rapidly expanding field. High quality papers written by leading experts encompass all the major diseases including epilepsy, movement disorders, neuromuscular disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and intellectual disability. Other exciting highlights include articles on brain imaging and neonatal neurology, and the publication of regularly updated tables relating to the main groups of disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信