未能达到护理标准的胸腰椎手术创新技术:最新进展回顾。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00898-9
Prerana Katiyar, Matan Malka, Justin L Reyes, Joseph M Lombardi, Lawrence G Lenke, Zeeshan M Sardar
{"title":"未能达到护理标准的胸腰椎手术创新技术:最新进展回顾。","authors":"Prerana Katiyar, Matan Malka, Justin L Reyes, Joseph M Lombardi, Lawrence G Lenke, Zeeshan M Sardar","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00898-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate previously popular technologies in the field of spine surgery, and to better understand their advantages and limitations to the current standards of care. Spine surgery is an ever-evolving field that serves to resolve various spinal pathologies in patients of all ages. While there are established treatments for various conditions, such as lumbar spinal stenosis, idiopathic scoliosis, and degenerative lumbar disease, there is always further research and development in these areas to produce innovative technologies that can lead to better outcomes. As this process progresses, we must remind ourselves of previously tried and tested inventions and their outcomes that have fallen short of becoming a standard to ensure we are able to learn lessons from the past.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough literature review was conducted with the aim of compiling literature of previously utilized technologies in spine surgery. Biomedical databases were utilized to gather relevant articles including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Emphasis was placed on gathering articles with technologies or therapeutics aimed at treating common spinal pathologies including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and other degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The keywords used were: \"failed technologies\", \"historical technologies\", \"spine surgery\", \"spinal stenosis\", \"adolescent idiopathic scoliosis\", and \"degenerative lumbar spine disease\". A total of 47 articles were gathered after initial review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different technologies pertaining to spine surgery were identified and critically evaluated. Some of these technologies included X-STOP, Vertiflex, Vertebral Body Stapling, and Dynesys. These technologies were evaluated for their strengths and limitations across their spinal pathology applications. While each type of technology had their benefits, the data tended to be mixed with various limitations across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These technologies have been trialed in the field of spine surgery across various spinal pathologies, but still prove of limited efficacy and shortcomings to the current standards of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative technologies in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine surgery failing to reach standard of care: state-of-art review.\",\"authors\":\"Prerana Katiyar, Matan Malka, Justin L Reyes, Joseph M Lombardi, Lawrence G Lenke, Zeeshan M Sardar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-024-00898-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate previously popular technologies in the field of spine surgery, and to better understand their advantages and limitations to the current standards of care. Spine surgery is an ever-evolving field that serves to resolve various spinal pathologies in patients of all ages. While there are established treatments for various conditions, such as lumbar spinal stenosis, idiopathic scoliosis, and degenerative lumbar disease, there is always further research and development in these areas to produce innovative technologies that can lead to better outcomes. As this process progresses, we must remind ourselves of previously tried and tested inventions and their outcomes that have fallen short of becoming a standard to ensure we are able to learn lessons from the past.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough literature review was conducted with the aim of compiling literature of previously utilized technologies in spine surgery. Biomedical databases were utilized to gather relevant articles including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Emphasis was placed on gathering articles with technologies or therapeutics aimed at treating common spinal pathologies including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and other degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The keywords used were: \\\"failed technologies\\\", \\\"historical technologies\\\", \\\"spine surgery\\\", \\\"spinal stenosis\\\", \\\"adolescent idiopathic scoliosis\\\", and \\\"degenerative lumbar spine disease\\\". A total of 47 articles were gathered after initial review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different technologies pertaining to spine surgery were identified and critically evaluated. Some of these technologies included X-STOP, Vertiflex, Vertebral Body Stapling, and Dynesys. These technologies were evaluated for their strengths and limitations across their spinal pathology applications. While each type of technology had their benefits, the data tended to be mixed with various limitations across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These technologies have been trialed in the field of spine surgery across various spinal pathologies, but still prove of limited efficacy and shortcomings to the current standards of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00898-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00898-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估脊柱外科领域以前流行的技术,更好地了解这些技术的优势和对现行医疗标准的限制。脊柱手术是一个不断发展的领域,可解决各年龄段患者的各种脊柱病症。虽然对腰椎管狭窄症、特发性脊柱侧弯症和退行性腰椎病等各种病症都有成熟的治疗方法,但这些领域始终在进行进一步的研究和开发,以产生能带来更好疗效的创新技术。在这一过程中,我们必须提醒自己以前尝试和测试过的发明及其结果,这些发明未能成为标准,以确保我们能够从过去的经验中吸取教训:方法:我们进行了全面的文献综述,目的是汇编脊柱手术中以前使用过的技术文献。我们利用生物医学数据库收集相关文章,包括 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE。重点收集了旨在治疗常见脊柱病症(包括腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)、青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)和其他退行性腰椎疾病)的技术或疗法的文章。使用的关键词是"失败技术"、"历史技术"、"脊柱手术"、"椎管狭窄"、"青少年特发性脊柱侧凸 "和 "退行性腰椎疾病"。经过初步审查,共收集到 47 篇文章:结果:确定并严格评估了与脊柱手术有关的各种技术。其中一些技术包括 X-STOP、Vertiflex、椎体缝合和 Dynesys。对这些技术在脊柱病理学应用方面的优势和局限性进行了评估。虽然每种技术都有其优点,但各项研究的数据往往参差不齐,存在各种局限性:结论:这些技术已在脊柱外科领域的各种脊柱病理中试用,但仍被证明疗效有限,与当前的护理标准相比存在不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative technologies in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine surgery failing to reach standard of care: state-of-art review.

Purpose: To evaluate previously popular technologies in the field of spine surgery, and to better understand their advantages and limitations to the current standards of care. Spine surgery is an ever-evolving field that serves to resolve various spinal pathologies in patients of all ages. While there are established treatments for various conditions, such as lumbar spinal stenosis, idiopathic scoliosis, and degenerative lumbar disease, there is always further research and development in these areas to produce innovative technologies that can lead to better outcomes. As this process progresses, we must remind ourselves of previously tried and tested inventions and their outcomes that have fallen short of becoming a standard to ensure we are able to learn lessons from the past.

Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted with the aim of compiling literature of previously utilized technologies in spine surgery. Biomedical databases were utilized to gather relevant articles including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Emphasis was placed on gathering articles with technologies or therapeutics aimed at treating common spinal pathologies including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and other degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The keywords used were: "failed technologies", "historical technologies", "spine surgery", "spinal stenosis", "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis", and "degenerative lumbar spine disease". A total of 47 articles were gathered after initial review.

Results: Different technologies pertaining to spine surgery were identified and critically evaluated. Some of these technologies included X-STOP, Vertiflex, Vertebral Body Stapling, and Dynesys. These technologies were evaluated for their strengths and limitations across their spinal pathology applications. While each type of technology had their benefits, the data tended to be mixed with various limitations across studies.

Conclusion: These technologies have been trialed in the field of spine surgery across various spinal pathologies, but still prove of limited efficacy and shortcomings to the current standards of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信