S. Goya-Lirio , M. Hernando-Llorens , S. García de Garayo-Díaz , J. Regalado-de Los Cobos
{"title":"对西班牙阿拉巴地区急性心力衰竭住院患者的 EFFECT 死亡率预测量表进行外部验证。","authors":"S. Goya-Lirio , M. Hernando-Llorens , S. García de Garayo-Díaz , J. Regalado-de Los Cobos","doi":"10.1016/j.rceng.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To validate the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment) scales, which predict mortality at 1 month and 1 year after admission, in a defined cohort of patients admitted to the Araba University Hospital (HUA) with a diagnosis of acutely decompensated heart failure.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>External validation study of a predictive model, in a retrospective cohort of patients admitted between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 550 patients were included. The two scales demonstrated good overall discriminatory ability in our series, with an area under ROC (0.755 y 0.756) and values in Brier score (0.094 y 0.194) similar to the original series. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots and was also adequate. All this despite the fact that significant differences were observed in many clinical characteristics between our series and the original one.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The EFFECT scales showed good predictive ability and transportability. The one-month prediction scale was also useful for predicting mortality at one year. For both time periods, mortality was similar in the groups established in the original as low and very low risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94354,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"224 6","pages":"Pages 379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of the EFFECT mortality prediction scale in patients admitted for acute heart failure in Araba, Spain\",\"authors\":\"S. Goya-Lirio , M. Hernando-Llorens , S. García de Garayo-Díaz , J. Regalado-de Los Cobos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rceng.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To validate the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment) scales, which predict mortality at 1 month and 1 year after admission, in a defined cohort of patients admitted to the Araba University Hospital (HUA) with a diagnosis of acutely decompensated heart failure.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>External validation study of a predictive model, in a retrospective cohort of patients admitted between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 550 patients were included. The two scales demonstrated good overall discriminatory ability in our series, with an area under ROC (0.755 y 0.756) and values in Brier score (0.094 y 0.194) similar to the original series. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots and was also adequate. All this despite the fact that significant differences were observed in many clinical characteristics between our series and the original one.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The EFFECT scales showed good predictive ability and transportability. The one-month prediction scale was also useful for predicting mortality at one year. For both time periods, mortality was similar in the groups established in the original as low and very low risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"volume\":\"224 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 379-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2254887424000766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2254887424000766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在阿拉巴大学医院(HUA)确诊为急性失代偿性心力衰竭的住院患者群体中验证EFFECT(有效心脏治疗强化反馈)量表,该量表可预测入院后1个月和1年的死亡率:方法:对2020年10月1日至2021年9月30日期间入院的患者进行回顾性队列研究,对预测模型进行外部验证:结果:共纳入 550 名患者。在我们的系列研究中,这两个量表表现出良好的整体判别能力,ROC下面积(0.755 y 0.756)和Brier评分值(0.094 y 0.194)与原始系列相似。使用 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和校准图对校准进行了评估,结果也是适当的。尽管在许多临床特征方面,我们的系列研究与原始系列研究之间存在着显著差异,但我们还是取得了上述成果:结论:EFFECT量表具有良好的预测能力和可移植性。结论:EFFECT量表显示出良好的预测能力和可移植性,一个月的预测量表对预测一年的死亡率也很有用。在这两个时间段内,在最初确定的低风险组和极低风险组中,死亡率相似。
External validation of the EFFECT mortality prediction scale in patients admitted for acute heart failure in Araba, Spain
Aim
To validate the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment) scales, which predict mortality at 1 month and 1 year after admission, in a defined cohort of patients admitted to the Araba University Hospital (HUA) with a diagnosis of acutely decompensated heart failure.
Method
External validation study of a predictive model, in a retrospective cohort of patients admitted between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021.
Results
A total of 550 patients were included. The two scales demonstrated good overall discriminatory ability in our series, with an area under ROC (0.755 y 0.756) and values in Brier score (0.094 y 0.194) similar to the original series. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots and was also adequate. All this despite the fact that significant differences were observed in many clinical characteristics between our series and the original one.
Conclusions
The EFFECT scales showed good predictive ability and transportability. The one-month prediction scale was also useful for predicting mortality at one year. For both time periods, mortality was similar in the groups established in the original as low and very low risk.