治疗 Legg-Calvé-Perthes 病的股骨近端外翻截骨术:年龄和侧柱分类对中短期临床和放射学结果有影响吗?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nima Hoseini-Zare, Peyman Mirghaderi, Brice Ilharreborde, Kiarash Roustai-Geraylow, Alireza Moharrami, Taghi Baghdadi, Seyed Hadi Kalantar, Mohammad Hossein Nabian
{"title":"治疗 Legg-Calvé-Perthes 病的股骨近端外翻截骨术:年龄和侧柱分类对中短期临床和放射学结果有影响吗?","authors":"Nima Hoseini-Zare, Peyman Mirghaderi, Brice Ilharreborde, Kiarash Roustai-Geraylow, Alireza Moharrami, Taghi Baghdadi, Seyed Hadi Kalantar, Mohammad Hossein Nabian","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) is one of the most used treatment methods with acceptable outcomes for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). We aimed to investigate the influence of age at disease onset and the Lateral Pillar classification on clinical and radiological outcomes of FVO surgery LCPD patients between 6-12years of age.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up, regardless of preoperative age and Herring type.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty patients with LCPD (Herring groups B, B/C, and C) who underwent FVO were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated radiological [center-edge angle, extrusion index, epiphyseal index, acetabular index, articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD)] and clinical [hip abduction range of motion (ROM), Trendelenburg sign, pain, and Harris hip score (HHS)] outcomes with a follow-up of 37.3±10.5months (range: 24-180months). Finally, the overall treatment outcome was assessed using the Stulberg classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROC curve analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between age and clinical or radiological outcomes, and there was no predictable age cut-off for surgical outcomes (p=0.13). No significant difference was found in Stulberg classification at the follow-up between patients with type B, B/C, and C of the lateral pillar (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that open-wedge proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up. Each sample of our study was very small and a lot of variables were measured, making this result not adequately strong enough to draw a robust conclusion. However, FVO surgery remains a possible suggestion for patients in the early fragmentation phase, and age and lateral pillar type may not be limiting factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; therapeutic retrospective cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximal femoral varus osteotomy for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: Do age and lateral pillar classifications influence short-to-mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Nima Hoseini-Zare, Peyman Mirghaderi, Brice Ilharreborde, Kiarash Roustai-Geraylow, Alireza Moharrami, Taghi Baghdadi, Seyed Hadi Kalantar, Mohammad Hossein Nabian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) is one of the most used treatment methods with acceptable outcomes for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). We aimed to investigate the influence of age at disease onset and the Lateral Pillar classification on clinical and radiological outcomes of FVO surgery LCPD patients between 6-12years of age.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up, regardless of preoperative age and Herring type.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty patients with LCPD (Herring groups B, B/C, and C) who underwent FVO were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated radiological [center-edge angle, extrusion index, epiphyseal index, acetabular index, articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD)] and clinical [hip abduction range of motion (ROM), Trendelenburg sign, pain, and Harris hip score (HHS)] outcomes with a follow-up of 37.3±10.5months (range: 24-180months). Finally, the overall treatment outcome was assessed using the Stulberg classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROC curve analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between age and clinical or radiological outcomes, and there was no predictable age cut-off for surgical outcomes (p=0.13). No significant difference was found in Stulberg classification at the follow-up between patients with type B, B/C, and C of the lateral pillar (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that open-wedge proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up. Each sample of our study was very small and a lot of variables were measured, making this result not adequately strong enough to draw a robust conclusion. However, FVO surgery remains a possible suggestion for patients in the early fragmentation phase, and age and lateral pillar type may not be limiting factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; therapeutic retrospective cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103909\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:股骨近端外翻截骨术(FVO)是治疗Legg-Calvé-Perthes病(LCPD)最常用的方法之一,疗效可接受。我们旨在研究发病年龄和侧柱分类对6-12岁LCPD患者股骨近端外翻截骨手术的临床和放射学疗效的影响:材料与方法:回顾性研究了50例接受FVO手术的LCPD患者(Herring B、B/C和C组)。我们评估了随访 37.3 ± 10.5 个月(范围:24 - 180 个月)的放射学(中心边缘角、挤压指数、骺指数、髋臼指数、关节-转子间距 (ATD))和临床(髋关节外展活动范围 (ROM)、Trendelenburg 征、疼痛和 Harris 髋关节评分 (HHS))结果。最后,采用Stulberg分类法评估了总体治疗效果:ROC曲线分析显示,年龄与临床或放射学结果之间没有明显关系,手术结果也没有可预测的年龄分界线(P=0.13)。外侧支柱B型、B/C型和C型患者随访时的Stulberg分级无明显差异(P>0.05):讨论:我们的研究结果表明,在LCPD患者的早期破碎期进行开刃近端FVO手术,可在3年随访中获得可接受的临床和影像学结果。我们研究的每个样本都非常小,测量的变量也很多,因此这一结果不足以得出有力的结论。不过,对于处于早期破碎期的患者,FVO手术仍是一个可行的建议,年龄和侧柱类型可能不是限制因素:IV级;治疗性回顾性队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proximal femoral varus osteotomy for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: Do age and lateral pillar classifications influence short-to-mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes?

Introduction: Proximal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) is one of the most used treatment methods with acceptable outcomes for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). We aimed to investigate the influence of age at disease onset and the Lateral Pillar classification on clinical and radiological outcomes of FVO surgery LCPD patients between 6-12years of age.

Hypothesis: Proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up, regardless of preoperative age and Herring type.

Material and methods: Fifty patients with LCPD (Herring groups B, B/C, and C) who underwent FVO were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated radiological [center-edge angle, extrusion index, epiphyseal index, acetabular index, articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD)] and clinical [hip abduction range of motion (ROM), Trendelenburg sign, pain, and Harris hip score (HHS)] outcomes with a follow-up of 37.3±10.5months (range: 24-180months). Finally, the overall treatment outcome was assessed using the Stulberg classification.

Results: The ROC curve analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between age and clinical or radiological outcomes, and there was no predictable age cut-off for surgical outcomes (p=0.13). No significant difference was found in Stulberg classification at the follow-up between patients with type B, B/C, and C of the lateral pillar (p>0.05).

Discussion: Our results demonstrated that open-wedge proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up. Each sample of our study was very small and a lot of variables were measured, making this result not adequately strong enough to draw a robust conclusion. However, FVO surgery remains a possible suggestion for patients in the early fragmentation phase, and age and lateral pillar type may not be limiting factors.

Level of evidence: IV; therapeutic retrospective cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信