对增加心理健康护理机会的 FLOW 计划实施情况的评估。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Natalie E Hundt, Maribel Plasencia, Amber B Amspoker, Zenab Yusuf, Annette Walder, Herbert Nagamoto, Bo Kim, Christie Ga-Jing Tsao, Tracey L Smith
{"title":"对增加心理健康护理机会的 FLOW 计划实施情况的评估。","authors":"Natalie E Hundt, Maribel Plasencia, Amber B Amspoker, Zenab Yusuf, Annette Walder, Herbert Nagamoto, Bo Kim, Christie Ga-Jing Tsao, Tracey L Smith","doi":"10.1007/s11414-024-09886-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The FLOW program was designed to facilitate appropriate and safe transitions of patients from specialty mental health (SMH) to primary care (PC) as a method of improving access and reducing appointment burden on veterans who have improved or remitted. In this study, the team evaluated the implementation of FLOW across nine Veterans Affairs (VA) sites using a mixed-methods evaluation in a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial design. Outcome assessments used data from VA databases, dashboards, and semi-structured interviews and were guided by the Reach, Adoption, Effectiveness, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Across the sites, mean level reach was 1.36% of all specialty mental health patients transitioned to primary care (standard deviation [SD] = 1.05). Mean provider adoption was 10.2% (SD = 8.3%). Approximately 75% of veterans were fully satisfied with their transition and reported shared decision-making in the decision to transition. Rates of transitions did not decrease over the 6-month maintenance period following implementation. These data suggest that FLOW can be successfully implemented and maintained, although there was wide variation in implementation across sites. Future research should examine how to support sites that struggle with implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Implementation of the FLOW Program for Increasing Access to Mental Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie E Hundt, Maribel Plasencia, Amber B Amspoker, Zenab Yusuf, Annette Walder, Herbert Nagamoto, Bo Kim, Christie Ga-Jing Tsao, Tracey L Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-024-09886-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The FLOW program was designed to facilitate appropriate and safe transitions of patients from specialty mental health (SMH) to primary care (PC) as a method of improving access and reducing appointment burden on veterans who have improved or remitted. In this study, the team evaluated the implementation of FLOW across nine Veterans Affairs (VA) sites using a mixed-methods evaluation in a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial design. Outcome assessments used data from VA databases, dashboards, and semi-structured interviews and were guided by the Reach, Adoption, Effectiveness, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Across the sites, mean level reach was 1.36% of all specialty mental health patients transitioned to primary care (standard deviation [SD] = 1.05). Mean provider adoption was 10.2% (SD = 8.3%). Approximately 75% of veterans were fully satisfied with their transition and reported shared decision-making in the decision to transition. Rates of transitions did not decrease over the 6-month maintenance period following implementation. These data suggest that FLOW can be successfully implemented and maintained, although there was wide variation in implementation across sites. Future research should examine how to support sites that struggle with implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09886-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09886-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FLOW 计划旨在促进患者从精神健康专科(SMH)向初级保健(PC)的适当而安全的过渡,以此来改善就医途径并减轻病情好转或缓解的退伍军人的预约负担。在这项研究中,研究小组采用群组随机阶梯式楔形试验设计中的混合方法评估了 FLOW 在九个退伍军人事务(VA)机构中的实施情况。成果评估使用了退伍军人事务部数据库、仪表板和半结构化访谈中的数据,并以 "覆盖、采用、效果、实施和维护"(RE-AIM)框架为指导。在所有研究机构中,平均到达率为 1.36%(标准差 [SD] = 1.05)。医疗服务提供者的平均采用率为 10.2%(标准差 = 8.3%)。约 75% 的退伍军人对他们的转院完全满意,并表示在决定转院时是共同决策的。在实施后的 6 个月维持期内,过渡率没有下降。这些数据表明,FLOW 可以成功实施和维持,尽管在不同的实施地点存在很大差异。未来的研究应探讨如何为那些在实施过程中遇到困难的机构提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the Implementation of the FLOW Program for Increasing Access to Mental Health Care.

Evaluation of the Implementation of the FLOW Program for Increasing Access to Mental Health Care.

The FLOW program was designed to facilitate appropriate and safe transitions of patients from specialty mental health (SMH) to primary care (PC) as a method of improving access and reducing appointment burden on veterans who have improved or remitted. In this study, the team evaluated the implementation of FLOW across nine Veterans Affairs (VA) sites using a mixed-methods evaluation in a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial design. Outcome assessments used data from VA databases, dashboards, and semi-structured interviews and were guided by the Reach, Adoption, Effectiveness, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Across the sites, mean level reach was 1.36% of all specialty mental health patients transitioned to primary care (standard deviation [SD] = 1.05). Mean provider adoption was 10.2% (SD = 8.3%). Approximately 75% of veterans were fully satisfied with their transition and reported shared decision-making in the decision to transition. Rates of transitions did not decrease over the 6-month maintenance period following implementation. These data suggest that FLOW can be successfully implemented and maintained, although there was wide variation in implementation across sites. Future research should examine how to support sites that struggle with implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信