评估英格兰家庭护士伙伴关系在现实世界中的实施情况:数据链接研究。

Francesca Cavallaro, Amanda Clery, Ruth Gilbert, Jan van der Meulen, Sally Kendall, Eilis Kennedy, Catherine Phillips, Katie Harron
{"title":"评估英格兰家庭护士伙伴关系在现实世界中的实施情况:数据链接研究。","authors":"Francesca Cavallaro, Amanda Clery, Ruth Gilbert, Jan van der Meulen, Sally Kendall, Eilis Kennedy, Catherine Phillips, Katie Harron","doi":"10.3310/BVDW6447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Family Nurse Partnership is an intensive home visiting programme for adolescent mothers. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership on outcomes up to age 7 using national administrative data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We created a linked cohort of all mothers aged 13-19 using data from health, educational and children's social care and defined mothers enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership or not using Family Nurse Partnership system data. Propensity scores were used to create matched groups for analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One hundred and thirty-six local authorities in England with active Family Nurse Partnership sites between 2010 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Mothers aged 13-19 at last menstrual period with live births between April 2010 and March 2019, living in a Family Nurse Partnership catchment area and their firstborn child(ren).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The Family Nurse Partnership includes up to 64 home visits by a family nurse from early pregnancy until the child's second birthday and is combined with usual health and social care. Controls received usual health and social care.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Indicators of child maltreatment (hospital admissions for injury/maltreatment, referral to social care services); child health and development (hospital utilisation and education) outcomes and maternal hospital utilisation and educational outcomes up to 7 years following birth.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Family Nurse Partnership Information System, Hospital Episode Statistics, National Pupil Database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 110,520 eligible mothers, 25,680 (23.2%) were enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership. Enrolment rates varied across 122 sites (range: 11-68%). Areas with more eligible mothers had lower enrolment rates. Enrolment was higher among mothers aged 13-15 (52%), than 18-19 year-olds (21%). Indicators of child maltreatment: we found no evidence of an association between the Family Nurse Partnership and indicators of child maltreatment, except for an increased rate of unplanned admissions for maltreatment/injury-related diagnoses up to age 2 for children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers (6.6% vs. 5.7%, relative risk 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.24). Child health and developmental outcomes: there was weak evidence that children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers were more likely to achieve a Good Level of Development at age 5 (57.5% vs. 55.4%, relative risk 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.09). Maternal outcomes: There was some evidence that Family Nurse Partnership mothers were less likely to have a subsequent delivery within 18 months of the index birth (8.4% vs. 9.3%, relative risk 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.97). Younger and more vulnerable mothers received higher numbers of visits and were more likely to achieve fidelity targets. Meeting the fidelity targets was associated with some outcomes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Bias by indication and variation in the intervention and usual care over time and between areas may have limited our ability to detect effects. Multiple testing may have led to spurious, significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports findings from evaluations of the Family Nurse Partnership showing no evidence of benefit for maltreatment outcomes measured in administrative data. Amongst all the outcomes measured, we found weak evidence that the Family Nurse Partnership was associated with improvements in child development at school entry, a reduction in rapid repeat pregnancies and evidence of increased healthcare-seeking in the mother and child.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Future evaluations should capture better measures of Family Nurse Partnership interventions and usual care, more information on maternal risk factors and additional outcomes relating to maternal well-being.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The study is registered as NIHR CRN Portfolio (42900).</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/99/19) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 11. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"12 11","pages":"1-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the real-world implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership in England: a data linkage study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Cavallaro, Amanda Clery, Ruth Gilbert, Jan van der Meulen, Sally Kendall, Eilis Kennedy, Catherine Phillips, Katie Harron\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/BVDW6447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Family Nurse Partnership is an intensive home visiting programme for adolescent mothers. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership on outcomes up to age 7 using national administrative data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We created a linked cohort of all mothers aged 13-19 using data from health, educational and children's social care and defined mothers enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership or not using Family Nurse Partnership system data. Propensity scores were used to create matched groups for analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One hundred and thirty-six local authorities in England with active Family Nurse Partnership sites between 2010 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Mothers aged 13-19 at last menstrual period with live births between April 2010 and March 2019, living in a Family Nurse Partnership catchment area and their firstborn child(ren).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The Family Nurse Partnership includes up to 64 home visits by a family nurse from early pregnancy until the child's second birthday and is combined with usual health and social care. Controls received usual health and social care.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Indicators of child maltreatment (hospital admissions for injury/maltreatment, referral to social care services); child health and development (hospital utilisation and education) outcomes and maternal hospital utilisation and educational outcomes up to 7 years following birth.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Family Nurse Partnership Information System, Hospital Episode Statistics, National Pupil Database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 110,520 eligible mothers, 25,680 (23.2%) were enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership. Enrolment rates varied across 122 sites (range: 11-68%). Areas with more eligible mothers had lower enrolment rates. Enrolment was higher among mothers aged 13-15 (52%), than 18-19 year-olds (21%). Indicators of child maltreatment: we found no evidence of an association between the Family Nurse Partnership and indicators of child maltreatment, except for an increased rate of unplanned admissions for maltreatment/injury-related diagnoses up to age 2 for children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers (6.6% vs. 5.7%, relative risk 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.24). Child health and developmental outcomes: there was weak evidence that children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers were more likely to achieve a Good Level of Development at age 5 (57.5% vs. 55.4%, relative risk 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.09). Maternal outcomes: There was some evidence that Family Nurse Partnership mothers were less likely to have a subsequent delivery within 18 months of the index birth (8.4% vs. 9.3%, relative risk 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.97). Younger and more vulnerable mothers received higher numbers of visits and were more likely to achieve fidelity targets. Meeting the fidelity targets was associated with some outcomes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Bias by indication and variation in the intervention and usual care over time and between areas may have limited our ability to detect effects. Multiple testing may have led to spurious, significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports findings from evaluations of the Family Nurse Partnership showing no evidence of benefit for maltreatment outcomes measured in administrative data. Amongst all the outcomes measured, we found weak evidence that the Family Nurse Partnership was associated with improvements in child development at school entry, a reduction in rapid repeat pregnancies and evidence of increased healthcare-seeking in the mother and child.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Future evaluations should capture better measures of Family Nurse Partnership interventions and usual care, more information on maternal risk factors and additional outcomes relating to maternal well-being.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The study is registered as NIHR CRN Portfolio (42900).</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/99/19) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 11. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"1-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/BVDW6447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/BVDW6447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:家庭护士合作计划是一项针对青少年母亲的强化家访计划。我们的目的是利用全国性的行政数据,评估 "家庭护士伙伴关系 "对 7 岁以下儿童的效果:设计:我们利用卫生、教育和儿童社会关怀方面的数据创建了一个包含所有 13-19 岁母亲的关联队列,并利用家庭护士合作计划系统数据定义了是否加入家庭护士合作计划的母亲。使用倾向分数创建匹配组进行分析:2010年至2017年期间,英格兰有136个地方当局设有活跃的家庭护士伙伴关系站点:干预措施:家庭护士合作计划包括家庭护士从怀孕初期到孩子两岁生日期间进行的多达 64 次家访,并与常规医疗和社会护理相结合。对照组接受常规医疗和社会护理:主要结果测量指标:儿童虐待指标(因受伤/虐待入院、转诊至社会医疗服务机构);儿童健康和发展(医院使用率和教育)结果以及产妇住院使用率和教育结果(直至出生后 7 年):数据来源:家庭护士伙伴关系信息系统、医院事件统计、全国学生数据库:在 110 520 名符合条件的母亲中,有 25 680 名(23.2%)参加了家庭护士合作计划。122 个地点的登记率各不相同(范围:11%-68%)。符合条件的母亲越多的地区,注册率越低。13-15 岁母亲的注册率(52%)高于 18-19 岁母亲的注册率(21%)。儿童虐待指标:我们没有发现家庭护士合作计划与儿童虐待指标之间存在关联的证据,但家庭护士合作计划母亲所生儿童 2 岁以下因虐待/伤害相关诊断而计划外入院的比率有所增加(6.6% 对 5.7%,相对风险 1.15;95% 置信区间 1.07 至 1.24)。儿童健康和发育结果:有微弱证据表明,"家庭护士合作计划 "母亲所生子女更有可能在 5 岁时达到良好发育水平(57.5% 对 55.4%,相对风险 1.05;95% 置信区间 1.00 至 1.09)。孕产妇结果:有证据表明,"家庭护士合作计划 "的母亲在分娩后 18 个月内再次分娩的可能性较低(8.4% 对 9.3%,相对风险为 0.92;95% 置信区间为 0.88 至 0.97)。更年轻、更脆弱的母亲接受的访视次数更多,也更有可能达到忠诚度目标。达到忠诚度目标与某些结果有关:局限性:指标的偏差以及干预和常规护理在不同时期和不同地区的差异可能限制了我们检测效果的能力。多重测试可能会导致虚假的显著结果:本研究支持家庭护士合作计划的评估结果,即没有证据表明行政数据中测量的虐待结果是有益的。在所有测量的结果中,我们发现有微弱的证据表明,家庭护士合作计划与儿童入学时的发育改善、快速重复怀孕的减少以及母亲和儿童寻求医疗保健的增加有关:未来的工作:未来的评估应更好地衡量家庭护士合作计划的干预措施和常规护理,提供更多有关孕产妇风险因素的信息以及与孕产妇福祉相关的其他结果:研究注册:该研究注册为 NIHR CRN Portfolio (42900):该奖项由国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康与社会护理服务研究计划(NIHR奖项编号:17/99/19)资助,全文发表于《健康与社会护理服务研究》第12卷第11期。更多奖项信息,请参阅 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the real-world implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership in England: a data linkage study.

Background/objectives: The Family Nurse Partnership is an intensive home visiting programme for adolescent mothers. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership on outcomes up to age 7 using national administrative data.

Design: We created a linked cohort of all mothers aged 13-19 using data from health, educational and children's social care and defined mothers enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership or not using Family Nurse Partnership system data. Propensity scores were used to create matched groups for analysis.

Setting: One hundred and thirty-six local authorities in England with active Family Nurse Partnership sites between 2010 and 2017.

Participants: Mothers aged 13-19 at last menstrual period with live births between April 2010 and March 2019, living in a Family Nurse Partnership catchment area and their firstborn child(ren).

Interventions: The Family Nurse Partnership includes up to 64 home visits by a family nurse from early pregnancy until the child's second birthday and is combined with usual health and social care. Controls received usual health and social care.

Main outcome measures: Indicators of child maltreatment (hospital admissions for injury/maltreatment, referral to social care services); child health and development (hospital utilisation and education) outcomes and maternal hospital utilisation and educational outcomes up to 7 years following birth.

Data sources: Family Nurse Partnership Information System, Hospital Episode Statistics, National Pupil Database.

Results: Of 110,520 eligible mothers, 25,680 (23.2%) were enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership. Enrolment rates varied across 122 sites (range: 11-68%). Areas with more eligible mothers had lower enrolment rates. Enrolment was higher among mothers aged 13-15 (52%), than 18-19 year-olds (21%). Indicators of child maltreatment: we found no evidence of an association between the Family Nurse Partnership and indicators of child maltreatment, except for an increased rate of unplanned admissions for maltreatment/injury-related diagnoses up to age 2 for children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers (6.6% vs. 5.7%, relative risk 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.24). Child health and developmental outcomes: there was weak evidence that children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers were more likely to achieve a Good Level of Development at age 5 (57.5% vs. 55.4%, relative risk 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.09). Maternal outcomes: There was some evidence that Family Nurse Partnership mothers were less likely to have a subsequent delivery within 18 months of the index birth (8.4% vs. 9.3%, relative risk 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.97). Younger and more vulnerable mothers received higher numbers of visits and were more likely to achieve fidelity targets. Meeting the fidelity targets was associated with some outcomes.

Limitations: Bias by indication and variation in the intervention and usual care over time and between areas may have limited our ability to detect effects. Multiple testing may have led to spurious, significant results.

Conclusions: This study supports findings from evaluations of the Family Nurse Partnership showing no evidence of benefit for maltreatment outcomes measured in administrative data. Amongst all the outcomes measured, we found weak evidence that the Family Nurse Partnership was associated with improvements in child development at school entry, a reduction in rapid repeat pregnancies and evidence of increased healthcare-seeking in the mother and child.

Future work: Future evaluations should capture better measures of Family Nurse Partnership interventions and usual care, more information on maternal risk factors and additional outcomes relating to maternal well-being.

Study registration: The study is registered as NIHR CRN Portfolio (42900).

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/99/19) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 11. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信